Offering constructive criticism to the social cripples in our midst since early 2005.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You think we'll get that clean a split? I'm inclined to get on the federalist bandwagon, but I have this sneaking suspicion that the evangelical trash has a broader agenda.

Shit, I'm not going to have a choice. Federalism it is.

What is it that you think Ted Olsen et al talk about at Fed Soc functions?

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
And too involved in digging dirt on Clinton. Total slimeball.

I hate to say it, but I don't think Alberto Gonzales is as bad as a lot of my liberal brethren seem to.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Matthew 19:16-21.

The way I read that is Jesus is saying be charitable, which I am. What I am saying is let me choose my charity. Not inconsistent.

For the current debate I think the "thou shall not kill" is the more important directive.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
What is it that you think Ted Olsen et al talk about at Fed Soc functions?

Evangelical shit.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I hate to say it, but I don't think Alberto Gonzales is as bad as a lot of my liberal brethren seem to.

Don't forget, as the liberal saber rattling commences, who the ultimate safe fall back pick is.


O.r.r.i.n.H.a.t.c.h.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

We can't lose.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
What is it that you think Ted Olsen et al talk about at Fed Soc functions?

You're confusing me with my assumptions regarding what the general public would think about Olsen. I ain't scared of no federalism. But to a lot of people, its a dirty word.

But as you said, to most people, it may as well be a brand of cheese, so its really a non-issue.

OK, elect Olsen. Do it fast and lets move on...

ETA: First douche to say "judges aren't elected" gets slapped.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Why not go with a moderate pick that is acceptable to everyone?

I think its time to get a specialist on board. Was it Jimmy Lee Swaggert or Oral Roberts who actullay spoke with God?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You're confusing me with my assumptions regarding what the general public would think about Olsen. I ain't scared of no federalism. But to a lot of people, its a dirty word.

But as you said, to most people, it may as well be a brand of cheese, so its really a non-issue.

OK, elect Olsen. Do it fast and lets move on...

Justices aren't elected.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If Kennedy is so worried about stopping anyone "who would roll back individual rights" why is he and his socialist pals have no respect for or concern for rolling my right to retain my hard earned property (i.e. income and assets)?

I would think after Chappaquidick Kennedy would avoid the word roll entirely, but I'm no shrink.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I think its time to get a specialist on board. Was it Jimmy Lee Swaggert or Oral Roberts who actullay spoke with God?

I think they both spoke with God, but in Oral's case, God spoke back. Problem is, She doesn't speak English he got the message kinda fucked up.

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I think its time to get a specialist on board. Was it Jimmy Lee Swaggert or Oral Roberts who actullay spoke with God?

Must have been Roberts. Swaggert, the more humble of the two, actually emulated Jesus and hung out with prostitutes, although unlike Jesus, his conversations with them included begging for golden showers and the like.

Federal court system justices aren't elected, by the way.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Must have been Roberts. Swaggert, the more humble of the two, actually emulated Jesus and hung out with prostitutes, although unlike Jesus, his conversations with them included begging for golden showers and the like.

Federal court system justices aren't elected, by the way.

The best trial guy i've known had this theory- when a judge dies/retires lock the courthouse doors. get a list of everyone in the court at the time. the president can then pick from that as his shortlist. This way you'd get someone who at least has some knowledge of the trial function. Of course it doesn't work well at the appealette level.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The best trial guy i've known had this theory- when a judge dies/retires lock the courthouse doors. get a list of everyone in the court at the time. the president can then pick from that as his shortlist. This way you'd get someone who at least has some knowledge of the trial function. Of course it doesn't work well at the appealette level.

Why not?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Why not?

Usually closed. At least at the Supreme court level, plus too many poseurs just there to say they've been there.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I hate to say it, but I don't think Alberto Gonzales is as bad as a lot of my liberal brethren seem to.

Novak doesn't want Gonzales. Maybe that is a good thing:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20050627.shtml