» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 775 |
0 members and 775 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
04-11-2003, 12:16 AM
|
#1981
|
I didn't do it.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
|
Blocked (cross-posted to get a broader perspective)
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
Looks like IT has blocked this board's IP, and I can't get to it from work. Fuck. Any ideas?
I can get on fine from home, using the same PC. Looks like it's definitely an IT at work issue...
|
If they have blocked the name but not the ip numbers you can connect using those. Try lawtalkers.net that connects through the numbers.
Also try http://www.anonymizer.com/ if you have a popup blocker on make sure it doesn't interfere.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:19 AM
|
#1982
|
I didn't do it.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
|
Am I compliant?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Leagl, you and MR have been doing a marvelous job and all, and I'm just hoping that the board is 2K compliant. I guess we'll see in a moment . . . .
|
Nicely done.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:31 AM
|
#1983
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
|
Vanity Plate in my garage
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Texas must not be tough on vanity plates. One of my friends used to have (a long time ago) vanity plates that read "X QUEEN". She was not a pagent girl... She has owned a camaro before though.
n(hates vanity plates)cs
|
On the other end of the spectrum, I've seen a plate that reads "Redeemd."
I think that's a bit presumptuous.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:36 AM
|
#1984
|
Guest
|
Just screw IT
Try going through an anonimizer, e.g., http://www.anonymizer.com
The left side of the screen at that site allows you to plug in the URL and allows you to surf snoop-free (and, possibly allow you to get around you IT nazis).
We discussed this site a few years ago in the context of trying to hide the gifs/jpgs from your cache, and I explained then that the anonymizer likely would not work as that poster needed it, as everything ultimately is captured both at your computer and at your firm's server.
As an aside, if you are using the same computer (laptop) at home and at work, some systems (like the newer Novell) will image/synch your laptop to the firm's system and, therefore, you run the risk of having all your internet files copied onto the system for later persecution by the firm (Jesus, I'm starting to sound like Laird Bell. . .)
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:48 AM
|
#1985
|
Retired
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,193
|
Just screw IT
Quote:
Originally posted by kafka_esquire
Try going through an anonimizer, e.g., http://www.anonymizer.com
The left side of the screen at that site allows you to plug in the URL and allows you to surf snoop-free (and, possibly allow you to get around you IT nazis).
We discussed this site a few years ago in the context of trying to hide the gifs/jpgs from your cache, and I explained then that the anonymizer likely would not work as that poster needed it, as everything ultimately is captured both at your computer and at your firm's server.
As an aside, if you are using the same computer (laptop) at home and at work, some systems (like the newer Novell) will image/synch your laptop to the firm's system and, therefore, you run the risk of having all your internet files copied onto the system for later persecution by the firm (Jesus, I'm starting to sound like Laird Bell. . .)
|
If you use anonymizer you won't be able to log in to the site. Not a big issue, unless you want to post.
You can try doing a search for "public proxies" on the internet, and then set your browser up to use one of the working proxies. it will filter all traffic and your IT people probably wont be able to block sites that way. Just depends on how crafty your IT peeps are. They may not even let you access IE's proxy settings.
The other thing is, of course, to access the site with the IP address. Here it is: http://205.214.94.186
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:58 AM
|
#1986
|
Guest
|
Just screw IT
Quote:
Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
The other thing is, of course, to access the site with the IP address. Here it is: http://205.214.94.186
|
That might not work. I enter www.lawtalkers.net (without the penis gavel) and the URL automatically shows the numerical IP address.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 01:06 AM
|
#1987
|
Underpants Gnomes!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 302
|
Blocked (cross-posted to get a broader perspective)
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
Looks like IT has blocked this board's IP, and I can't get to it from work. Fuck. Any ideas?
I can get on fine from home, using the same PC. Looks like it's definitely an IT at work issue...
|
Alternatively, if your firm blocks third-party proxies and "anonymizing sites" (which it should do if it is serious about making sure that its censorware is not circumvented), or if these proxy sites don't properly handle cookies, you might also consider bypassing the firm's network altogether by bringing in your own laptop and either (1) logging onto your current ISP through your cellphone (assuming that you have a dialup account and your cellphone plan has a sufficient amount of extra minutes for you to use it for daytime surfing)*, or (2) subscribing to your wireless provider's data network.
*This is not idle theorizing as I have applied option (1) in order to surf the web while on a picnic in Central Park.
Last edited by pretermitted_child; 04-11-2003 at 01:12 AM..
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 01:23 AM
|
#1988
|
I didn't do it.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
|
Just screw IT
Quote:
Originally posted by kafka_esquire
That might not work. I enter www.lawtalkers.net (without the penis gavel) and the URL automatically shows the numerical IP address.
|
It's a redirect. So you actually go to lawtalkers.net which in turns sends you to the numerical address.
It might not work anyway, if they were clever enough to block the IP address instead of just the name.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 01:45 AM
|
#1989
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Am I compliant?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Leagl, you and MR have been doing a marvelous job and all, and I'm just hoping that the board is 2K compliant. I guess we'll see in a moment . . . .
|
DON'T
SAY
COMPLIANT.
f(fucking sadists)b
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 02:36 AM
|
#1990
|
Guest
|
Compliance
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 10:17 AM
|
#1991
|
Apathy rocks!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: under a rock
Posts: 2,711
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
My sister went to the University of Vermont and she described the kids who "acted" homeless by bumming around on Church Street with mongrel dogs on rope leashes and then went home that night in their 4Runners. Telegraph Avenue in Berkeley seems to have the same sort of kids.
|
Telluride, Colorado was full of "Trust=afarians" back in the early '90s.
__________________
All our final decisions are made in a state of mind that not going to last. - Proust
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 11:16 AM
|
#1992
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,278
|
Am I compliant?
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
DON'T
SAY
COMPLIANT.
f(fucking sadists)b
|
I'm about to have a breakdown due to that word.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 11:33 AM
|
#1993
|
She Said, Let's Go!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hollerin' for Heras
Posts: 1,781
|
A Really Gross Etiquette Issue (welcome back DS!)
From "Dear Prudence" column:
Prudie,
Recently, my mother passed away. I live more than 1,000 miles away and couldn't make it home for the funeral. The problem is that when I went online to read the obituary, it said that my mom had five daughters, not four. What happened was that the woman taking care of her as she got sicker was having an affair with my dad, and she was called a "daughter" in the obituary. My mother expressed to me many times that she didn't like this woman, but my dad wanted to keep her, for obvious reasons. Well, I called my dad and told him that I thought it was cheap and that he was a pig for doing such a thing with the obituary. He told me all my brothers and sisters, and even my mom's family, thought it was a good idea. My brothers and sisters knew he was having an affair with her, and now they think it is OK to write that this girl was a sibling? My brothers and sisters think that I was wrong and I shouldn't have said anything to our father. I don't think I am wrong in the least bit, and if he asks for an apology, I won't give it to him. He is almost twice her age.
—Burned Up
Dear Burn,
If you know for a fact that your sibs OK'd this nonsense, then they AND your dad are all whack jobs. You're either a child or you're not, and the caregiver/girlfriend certainly is not. The age difference, of course, is charming. And boy, it's really true: There's no fool like an old fool. Prepare yourself, dear, for the possibility that this woman will wind up in the paper again—on the wedding page.
—Prudie, empathetically
Aside from the sheer squickiness of calling one's mistress one's daughter, I am now looking forward to a proud new era of obits such as "Mrs. Jones is survived by her husband, Robert, and her younger, hotter side action, Bill." That's the kind of thing that will really comfort the cuckolded spouse and who-the-hell-wants-to-know-about-your-parents'-sex-lives kids in their time of grief.
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:22 PM
|
#1994
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
A Really Gross Etiquette Issue (welcome back DS!)
Quote:
Originally posted by purse junkie
Aside from the sheer squickiness of calling one's mistress one's daughter, I am now looking forward to a proud new era of obits such as "Mrs. Jones is survived by her husband, Robert, and her younger, hotter side action, Bill." That's the kind of thing that will really comfort the cuckolded spouse and who-the-hell-wants-to-know-about-your-parents'-sex-lives kids in their time of grief.
|
Yet another reason not to have kids, eh?
Anyway, where are the cops to arrest the guy for "incest"?
DA: So, Mr. Smith, Miss Hoochie is your daughter?
Smith: Um, well, no.
DA: But you described her in your wife's obituary as your daughter?
Smith: Yes.
DA: So you've been having carnal relations with your "daughter"?
|
|
|
04-11-2003, 12:25 PM
|
#1995
|
Guest
|
Dear Prudence
Well that woke me up on a sleepy, boring Friday.
If my father did that he'd be quickly making his own appearance on the obit page.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|