» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 661 |
0 members and 661 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
04-05-2005, 03:31 PM
|
#1996
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Nice! An informed electorate is really important to a functioning democracy. Bush lied!!!!
|
I'm thinking the electorate informed itself by reading newspapers over the course of the year, rather than waiting to look only at the 20 pictures in the Pulitzer-winning portfolio. Not least because they wouldn't know which pictures to look at until five months after the election. But your theory has some real promise. Put some more work into it, and I bet you can find a rich conservative -- a Scaife, say -- to back you with some $$$.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#1997
|
World Ruler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
On the plus side, recent legislative developments may make this incredibly biased selection of photos "indecent" and subject to criminal prosecution. God knows that'll produce an informed electorate. Regards!
|
Well, once the government controls the media, at least we won't have to worry about that pesky liberal bias.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:34 PM
|
#1998
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm thinking the electorate informed itself by reading newspapers over the course of the year, rather than waiting to look only at the 20 pictures in the Pulitzer-winning portfolio. Not least because they wouldn't know which pictures to look at until five months after the election. But your theory has some real promise. Put some more work into it, and I bet you can find a rich conservative -- a Scaife, say -- to back you with some $$$.
|
Oh, i'm sorry. You thought I was troubled by the "win" awarded by a leftist organization, for an orginazation i contend is biased. That wasn't my point, that would be similar to arguing about whether the Academy awards to Mike mean that the Academy has some liberal leaning. No my point was that the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not anti-american. You say maybe it was a theme- I guess i agree, maybe where we differ is on what the theme is.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:35 PM
|
#1999
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
GOP Senator on the Courts
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Like a wheelbarrow, they just keep getting rolled.
|
Only since the dems lost 4 seats last fall. Before that they put some check on the wanton tax cuts.
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:39 PM
|
#2000
|
World Ruler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Oh, i'm sorry. You thought I was troubled by the "win" awarded by a leftist organization, for an orginazation i contend is biased. That wasn't my point, that would be similar to arguing about whether the Academy awards to Mike mean that the Academy has some liberal leaning. No my point was that the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not anti-american. You say maybe it was a theme- I guess i agree, maybe where we differ is on what the theme is.
|
Some of the photos from the conservatives were actually pretty good.
![](http://americablog.blogspot.com/malecorpsxx.jpg)
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:39 PM
|
#2001
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Well, once the government controls the media, at least we won't have to worry about that pesky liberal bias.
|
did florida Coastal have any legal analysis courses?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#2002
|
Oooh, Rushie - call me.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Land of the Free
Posts: 28
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Oh, i'm sorry. You thought I was troubled by the "win" awarded by a leftist organization, for an orginazation i contend is biased. That wasn't my point, that would be similar to arguing about whether the Academy awards to Mike mean that the Academy has some liberal leaning. No my point was that the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not anti-american. You say maybe it was a theme- I guess i agree, maybe where we differ is on what the theme is.
|
You're my new crush. Who needs that megaloman anyway? Besides, he was dirty and hairy and probably not a real American man, like you.
I'll be in Detroit in a couple of weeks. Wanna get together?
__________________
Rush needs your help. Order the Limbaugh Letter at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/limbaughletter_defeatthem.guest.html. All proceeds go to the Limbaugh Legal Defense and Dominican Hooker Vacation Fund.
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:45 PM
|
#2003
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
No my point was that the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not anti-american.
|
How about this one, or this one, or this one, or this one? Your blogger's categorizations of these photos are tendentious and hacktacular. When you say "the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not ant-American," you're just full of shit. Did you look at them?
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:46 PM
|
#2004
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
GOP Senator on the Courts
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Only since the dems lost 4 seats last fall. Before that they put some check on the wanton tax cuts.
|
They didn't do that much last term, either. Maybe their press was a little better.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:50 PM
|
#2005
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
How about this one, or this one, or this one, or this one? Your blogger's categorizations of these photos are tendentious and hacktacular. When you say "the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not ant-American," you're just full of shit. Did you look at them?
|
these are pro-american how?
The random violence in our cities has been adopted by the Iraqis?
Our Humvees are so well made they can be burned up, and yet the frame can still support a man dancing on top?
How removed from real life is San Fransisco- I know sidd made partner there, but do none of the normal rules of civilization apply?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:53 PM
|
#2006
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
GOP Senator on the Courts
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
They didn't do that much last term, either. Maybe their press was a little better.
|
Although such measures are substantially symbolic, they did block the adoption of a budget resolution when they refused to go along with the massive tax cuts.
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:55 PM
|
#2007
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
How about this one, or this one, or this one, or this one? Your blogger's categorizations of these photos are tendentious and hacktacular. When you say "the AP can't come up with 1 photo that was not ant-American," you're just full of shit. Did you look at them?
|
You misunderstand. If the AP can't include pictures of GIs handing out candy to Iraqi kids as part of its Pulitzer submission, clearly these guys hate America.
Hank's preferred Pulitzer winners would inlude:
See that? NO ONE catches him in the light like that! Genius!
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Last edited by Gattigap; 04-05-2005 at 04:09 PM..
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 03:58 PM
|
#2008
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
these are pro-american how?
The random violence in our cities has been adopted by the Iraqis?
|
When you see dead Iraqis killed by a car bomber, do you not understand a little better what we are trying to do over there?
If you want to argue that those photos are somehow anti-American, you're going to have to do just a little bit better. (Many of them were taken during combat, and there is (rightly) a long tradition of recognizing journalists who put themselves in harm's way to get those pictures.)
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 04:01 PM
|
#2009
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
GOP Senator on the Courts
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Although such measures are substantially symbolic, they did block the adoption of a budget resolution when they refused to go along with the massive tax cuts.
|
Exactly. Lip service.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 04:08 PM
|
#2010
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,276
|
show you our objectvivity? objectivity- we don't need no stinking objectivity
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Were there any young characters in the novel?
You can't be that dense- can you?
AP submits 20 (that's 20) photos- they win! the 20 had the mentioned breakdown. You think your little fiction story means anything? Keep your head in the sand, but unless you change your outlook you may have to pull it out someday soon so you can dob at Mecca 3 times a day.
|
I'm irritated that the Knight Ridder stuff coming out of Iraq was dissed. They have a fairly small staff and little access, so they actually have to talk to people instead of getting briefings to regurgitate.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|