Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever!

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
No. Ugly people are NotAttractive and even he agrees I ain't ugly.

I think he's a hard grader. all I'm saying and shit everyone here agrees.

I want to get this clear. Only ugly people are not attractive.

Are not attractive people therefore ugly?

(I had a hard time with the Logic class I took in college and could only pass the exams if I got high first. I may need to go looking to see what dope is in the house.)

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
except paragraph numbering but that was new when I switched disciplines.

Is becoming a paragraph-numberer a step up from being a rider-inserter?

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Banana Republic has been sending me e-mails about cropped pants a lot latley. Too weirdly formal?

Ann Taylor has as well. I like them. cuffed.

[dtb]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I will contribute too. And there is no need to report on your hotness because your smokin'ness has already been accurately confirmed.

Thank you!!!

and Thank you!!!!

For anyone who would like to contribute, please click on this link and search for me by my real name. If you don't know my real name, PM me and I'll tell you.

It will keep track of who/how much contributed, so I can put up my matching contribution at the end.

Yay!! LT people are AWESOME!

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
It's not lying TM. I think that is the big disconnect here. I didn't find you attractive but can see objectively how women could. You don't seem to find within yourself that ability. Even if you didn't want to throw someone down. Someone somewhere out there may find that person attractive.

You have just made the word completely pointless. If it holds no meaning, I could say that fish paste is attractive.

There is no doubt in my or anyone's mind that some people find you attractive -- your husband, for example (notwithstanding the weight thing). There is no one in the world who someone doesn't find attractive. Is that what you want me to concede? Because that's not an evaluation. That's a Stuart Smalley episode.

TM

"Someone," in this case, does not necessarily mean Wonk.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Which of your two dining companions was more approving?

Good question. They were both pretty equally effusive, but in different ways.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Those are not attractive. Ugly. Not pretty. Not hot. And nothing you do is going to change my mind on that.

I don't like the linen ones from Bliss all that much either.

But what dtb wants, dtb gets. In Bisbee or elsewhere.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
So what you are saying is that all people are attractive?

No. It's all subjective. I like 400 lb women with huge hairy moles everywhere. Who are you to tell me they're unattractive?

I think assholes are beautiful. I've petitioned Playboy for more red-eye for years. Alas, they claim some generally accepted standard of beauty applies.

[Penske_Account]

All:

I was getting ready to vote in the Shifter poll, and unfortunately, my honest vote was not going to be wholly complimentary or fulfilling to him (or at least I imagine that to be the case)...

Anyhoo, my less than perfect vote started to feel at odds with my oath to be more kinder, gentler and well behaviouralised, and so, I decided not to vote....a second time (I had already voted once, before the above realisation hit me)....

Further, I decided that for me, and this is just for me and not a statement or judgment on anyone else, I am no longer ranking any of the members here (or their socks, individually and collectively) on subjective criteria such as their looks, ratios or weight et al etc. etc. I find you all beautiful in your own ways, except to the extent that you are not....

Anyhoo, in conclusion, I will continue to rate and judge people by objectively empirical criteria, eg: IQ, 5K PR, Leadville 100 PR, LSAT et al etc. etc., as and if applicable, but no more subjective ranking for me.

Carry on.

Regards,

P

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I want to get this clear. Only ugly people are not attractive.

Are not attractive people therefore ugly?

(I had a hard time with the Logic class I took in college and could only pass the exams if I got high first. I may need to go looking to see what dope is in the house.)

Ugly is truly rare, but unattractive is pretty commonplace. In this regard, ugly is exotic, and therefore attractive in its own way, while unattractive remains bland and, well, unattractive.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Good question. They were both pretty equally effusive, but in different ways.

I bet I can guess which one used the word "fabulous."

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You have just made the word completely pointless. If it holds no meaning, I could say that fish paste is attractive.

There is no doubt in my or anyone's mind that some people find you attractive -- your husband, for example (notwithstanding the weight thing). There is no one in the world who someone doesn't find attractive. Is that what you want me to concede? Because that's not an evaluation. That's a Stuart Smalley episode.

TM

"Someone," in this case, does not necessarily mean Wonk.

Wonk thinks I'm butt. let's get that out of the way. ha.

No the harsh way you initially worded it left room for doubt. it was a damning missive not softened by any sort of throw her a bone type softening type language that is generally couched as tact. You are a wordsmith. Even if your brash on line persona is known for not pulling any punches you could have softened the blow and you chose not to. I bet you money after today shapey won't go all batshit on me about how ugly I am and how my bra I must be lying.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Ugly is truly rare, but unattractive is pretty commonplace. In this regard, ugly is exotic, and therefore attractive in its own way, while unattractive remains bland and, well, unattractive.

I disagree. I see ugly and fat and nasty all day in NYC. Perhaps not so much in your fair city?

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Wonk thinks I'm butt. let's get that out of the way. ha.

No the harsh way you initially worded it left room for doubt. it was a damning missive not softened by any sort of throw her a bone type softening type language that is generally couched as tact. You are a wordsmith. Even if your brash on line persona is known for not pulling any punches you could have softened the blow and you chose not to. I bet you money after today shapey won't go all batshit on me about how ugly I am and how my bra I must be lying.

How would "throwing you a bone" have changed his assessment of you?

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
I disagree. I see ugly and fat and nasty all day in NYC. Perhaps not so much in your fair city?

You're the poster formerly know as NotMe, aren't you?