LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 593
0 members and 593 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2005, 08:38 PM   #196
andViolins
(Moderator) oHIo
 
andViolins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
Huh?

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
This is how I know I'm not a workoholic. I would not miss it. Not for a minute. If I were independently wealthy, I could walk away from the rat-in-a-maze routine without a single glance back. And I'm pretty sure I could find interesting and fun ways to spend my time for at least 2 years before it even became challenging. I have a few friends who have spent hiatuses from their careers (after collecting a bronze parachute or just saving up and ditching it all for a while) having the best time of their lives. Scuba diving in Costa Rico, exploring New Zealand, etc. Oh, how I'd miss the intellectual pursuits. Yeah, right.

Holy shit. I'm the female Sebby.
GIANT ASS FUCKING 2!

Well, except for the female part.

aV
andViolins is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 08:50 PM   #197
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Huh?

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
This is how I know I'm not a workoholic. I would not miss it. Not for a minute. If I were independently wealthy, I could walk away from the rat-in-a-maze routine without a single glance back. And I'm pretty sure I could find interesting and fun ways to spend my time for at least 2 years before it even became challenging. I have a few friends who have spent hiatuses from their careers (after collecting a bronze parachute or just saving up and ditching it all for a while) having the best time of their lives. Scuba diving in Costa Rico, exploring New Zealand, etc. Oh, how I'd miss the intellectual pursuits. Yeah, right.

Holy shit. I'm the female Sebby.

Waitaminnit. Gatti said he'd spend his time at "golf, crappy painting and writing piece-of-shit unpublished novels." That is ever so slightly different from scuba diving in Costa Rica (or her brother, Costa Rico), etc.

I could find plenty of interesting ways to spend my time if I were not working. But they would cost a bit more than sitting in my Gatti-garrett writing the next Great American Downtown Los Angelean Nothing Else To Do Unpublished Novel. (Shit, by the time you say that phrase, the next one probably already got written.)
Sidd Finch is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 08:56 PM   #198
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
Huh?

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
the next Great American Downtown Los Angelean Nothing Else To Do Unpublished Novel.
Ahem. Down here, those are called "commercials."
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:18 PM   #199
notcasesensitive
Flaired.
 
notcasesensitive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
Huh?

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Waitaminnit. Gatti said he'd spend his time at "golf, crappy painting and writing piece-of-shit unpublished novels." That is ever so slightly different from scuba diving in Costa Rica (or her brother, Costa Rico), etc.

I could find plenty of interesting ways to spend my time if I were not working. But they would cost a bit more than sitting in my Gatti-garrett writing the next Great American Downtown Los Angelean Nothing Else To Do Unpublished Novel. (Shit, by the time you say that phrase, the next one probably already got written.)
So I was ignoring the point of your post and instead using it as a jumping off point for my own little rant? Told you I'm the female Sebby.
notcasesensitive is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:22 PM   #200
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Yes, but the "business community" does very little lobbying -- virtually none compared to the amount done by individual companies and sectors, virtually all of which are happy to have protectionist, anti-growth legislation. If the makers of buggy-whips had had a good lobbyist....
Sidd - this is just wrong. I don't know where you get this. Business organizations and associations are the most signficant lobbyist in State Capitals in the National Capitals for Republicans. Whenver a bill comes up in Sacramento the first thing the Repubicans ask is "where does the chamber stand." You have the Manufacturere Assocition, Tech Net etc.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch Lobbyists like the Chamber of Commerce can be pro-growth in a beneficial way. But they can also be anti-tax (i.e., pro-deficit), anti-worker safety, anti-environment, and pro-welfare (i.e., oppose increasing the minimum wage or providing health insurance and let gov't bear the burden) in ways that are very damaging.
Most of the lobbying they do today is anti-competition. Pro-tariffs, ant-flexible hours, limiting the type of businesses that non union companys get into. They were against deregulation of the Arilne Industry, the Phone company. etc.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch I agree with you in general about a lot of union lobbying, but I'm sure glad for some of the basic worker safety and safety net legislation that unions helped bring about.

Business lobbyists can also be as hostile to change as unions, because the business community is often very short-sighted. Environmental laws and regs, for example, are seen as a threat to existing business rather than as an opportunity for new businesses to be created. The reason behind seems obvious -- the Chamber of Commerce is funded by existing business, not by those that may be created in the future.
That is nice in theory but it just does not match up to practical application. Since I have been invovled in California State Politics (six years) most bills that effect the economy or business come down to the Chamber v. The Unions. The Unions are always on the side of regulation and restrictions where the Chamber is on the other side. The Unions passed a law that ended flexible hours in the silicon valley (people could not work a four day ten hour workday), they want to stop Costco from selling food, they did not want state government contracts to go to competitive bidding, the wanted to keep the workers compensation system in a state that was strangling business etc.
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:26 PM   #201
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
"Flexible and dynamic"? You're taking the concept of "wiggle word" to new heights. The only flexible and dynami thing business is doing is figuring out ways to lower costs. Production/revenue hasn't been moving up, so businesses for the last several years have had to "grow" profits by cutting costs. Thats the big lie in the Bush economy. The numbers don't reflect growth - they reflect wringing the same amount of product out of less bodies and machinery.

What unions are doing is trying to keep a certain standard wage for their workers. They are necessary. And you're seeing why right now. If allowed, employers will - in fact, they have an obligation to - reduce costs as much as possible. Workers are a cost. The reason so many white collar workers are getting shitty pay and shitty benefits is because they have no bargaining power. They're becoming what the blue collar workers were before unions. Business has no "check" at the moment.

I agree that theoretically, business should be allowed to wipe out as many workers as it likes. The problem is, I'm not sure that society benefits from that arrangement.

Ayn Rand, much as I like her views, was, from a practical perspective, an idiot.
Ayn Rand? Your study of economics may come from Ayn Rand and Norma Rae but not mine. I see the practical effect of what the unions are up to every time I get a call from Sacramento saying "you are not going to guess what the unions are up to now." See my earlier comment on where they stand on regulation, competition, and free trade acts.
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:28 PM   #202
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This makes no sense from an economic perspective, and it turns out to be false. For example, unions have been key supporters of drilling in the ANWR.
You name one thing and think that trumps every example I have given. Anti-free trade, anti-competitive bidding, anti-flexible working hours, anti every industrial deregulation that has every come up (phone company, arlines industry etc.).
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:30 PM   #203
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
What about when the business community is trying to get worker safety laws repealed/modified? Unions are probably quite flexible about how businesses -- other than the one their members are employed -- conduct themselves. ILGW vs. Steelworkers, for example.

You are such a freak about seeing things you don't like as lacking any shades of grey, but being able to appreciate the finer subtleties of what you perceive to be basically on your side.

I'm thinking this is going to be another one of those "you just don't get it" things like your whole higher power crap thing.
Finer subtleties? You are the one lost in theory and lack practical perspective. I am aware of what bills are passing through the California legislature and see where the unions and the Chamber stack up on all these bills.
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:33 PM   #204
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And while many unions opposed NAFTA, I believe others supported them. NAFTA, after all, was a big benefit to longshoremen and dockworkers.

Imagine that -- unions acting to further the selfish interests of their members. It sounds almost.... like capitalism. No wonder Spanky hates it.
Yes some Unions support free trade just like some African Americans support the Republican party. By far the biggest fudning and most intense lobbying against all the free trade agreements comes from unions. Just like there are some businesses that are against free trade. But the pro-free trade unions and the anti-free trade businesses are both pretty insignificant.
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 09:34 PM   #205
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Well, that'll never be cured. Other than providing an inheritancce for their kids, deep down inside, most folks ain't thinking too far beyond their own lifetimes. We're kind of wired that way.
The point you are missing is everyone of those businesses want to grow. They understand a growing economy is the best way to do that.
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 11:23 PM   #206
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Michael Jackson

Guilty or not Guilty:

I am guessing guilty

P.S. (if you are not going to make a prediction don't answer this post. You only get to expound if you are willing to take the risk that your B.S. will be shown to be wrong)
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 11:23 PM   #207
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
You name one thing and think that trumps every example I have given. Anti-free trade, anti-competitive bidding, anti-flexible working hours, anti every industrial deregulation that has every come up (phone company, arlines industry etc.).
If you're talking about Sacramento, I probably agree with you. I would rather live in a genuine two-party state. So it's notable that I picked an example of federal legislation, while you are talking about Sacto.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-06-2005, 11:51 PM   #208
jack o' phile
Registered User
 
jack o' phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: neversayneverland
Posts: 9
Michael Jackson

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Guilty or not Guilty:

I am guessing guilty

P.S. (if you are not going to make a prediction don't answer this post. You only get to expound if you are willing to take the risk that your B.S. will be shown to be wrong)
You are wrong you racist fuck!

MJ said it best in 1993:

"But if I am guilty of anything, it is of giving all that I have to give to help children all over the world. It is of loving children, of all ages and races, it is of gaining sheer joy from seeing children with their innocent and smiling faces. It is of enjoying, through them, the childhood that I missed myself. If I am guilty of anything, it is of believing what God said about children: "Suffer little children to come unto me and forbid them not, for such is the kingdom of heaven."

Right on! We love you Michael and we believe in you!
__________________
Your Butt Is Mine Because I'm Bad, I'm Bad-Come On-You Know It!
jack o' phile is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:36 AM   #209
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you're talking about Sacramento, I probably agree with you. I would rather live in a genuine two-party state. So it's notable that I picked an example of federal legislation, while you are talking about Sacto.
I am not just talking abouy Sacramento. The ATT breakup and Airline deregulation were done by Congress. When Clinton asked for Fast Track Authority only about ninety Democrat congressman voted for it. The Dems would not even trust this authority in the hands of their own party leader. The rest of the votes he got from Republicans. When Bush asked for Fast Track Authority he got almost no Democrat votes. The only reason why you vote against Fast Track Authority is if you are against Free trade. There is no other excuse. Nafta and the WTO were almost overwhelmingly passed by the Republicans. The Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, Technet and almost every business organization supports CAFTA yet Bush has been told he can't count on a single Dem vote. If you are for free trade, one party clearly needs to be your choice.

Last edited by Spanky; 06-07-2005 at 03:39 AM..
Spanky is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 08:56 AM   #210
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Breaking economic principles down to a level so basic that they are meaningless.

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
If you are for free trade, one party clearly needs to be your choice.
What if you're a steel company, a softwood lumber company, or a sugar company?
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.