LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,515
0 members and 1,515 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2004, 06:27 PM   #2191
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
The complaint is about the rules. Competitive balance is, um, lacking when the Yankees spend so much more than everyone, and when the Red Sox spend so much more than everyone but the Yankees.
If it were a complaint about the rules it wouldn't be so bad. But it's not. It's a complaint about the Yankees over and over again for being successful within those rules. Instead of people calling for a salary cap, which would make sense (and I am in full support of), they say, "Tax the Yankees!" The Yankees represent all that is evil. No. The owners (probably even Steinbrenner) would be all for a salary cap. It's because of the union that it will never happen.

And someone needs to beat the shit out of Ben Affleck. People from Boston should be ashamed that they run to that dumbass whenever the Red Sox get fucked.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:30 PM   #2192
Alex_de_Large
halfsharkalligatorhalfmod
 
Alex_de_Large's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Ryugyong Hotel
Posts: 3,218
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall And someone needs to beat the shit out of Ben Affleck. People from Boston should be ashamed that they run to that dumbass whenever the Red Sox get fucked.

TM
Today's SportsGuy has a wonderful couple of graphs about Afflek and a certain big-assed chick from the Bronx. Good stuff.


Edited to add link
__________________
---

Last edited by Alex_de_Large; 02-17-2004 at 06:34 PM..
Alex_de_Large is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:32 PM   #2193
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Advice

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Yeah. But we make up for it by swimming in more forgiving ponds.
Pool, pond. The pond would be better for you.



TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:42 PM   #2194
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Pierce Brosnan will not make a fifth Bond film, sources say.

I still haven't seen anyone who'll do better than Clive Owen. He showed he had the stuff in his limited role in "The Bourne Identity." But is the world ready for a Bond actor named "Clive"?

Any other suggestions? Anyone mentioning Rupert Everett will be laughed out of the virtual room.
I can see Colin Firth playing Bond. Although I agree that Clive Owen has theright stuff, Bond-wise, he suffers from not being old enough. Bond needs a few years on him.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:44 PM   #2195
Flinty_McFlint
Moderator
 
Flinty_McFlint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i put on my robe and wizard hat
Posts: 4,838
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Pierce Brosnan will not make a fifth Bond film, sources say.

I still haven't seen anyone who'll do better than Clive Owen. He showed he had the stuff in his limited role in "The Bourne Identity." But is the world ready for a Bond actor named "Clive"?

Any other suggestions? Anyone mentioning Rupert Everett will be laughed out of the virtual room.

Brosnan will be back.
__________________
I'm going to become rich and famous after I invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
Flinty_McFlint is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:46 PM   #2196
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Advice

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Pool, pond. The pond would be better for you.



TM
I can think of worse ways to spend my time than hanging out with Scarlett Johanssen (sp.?). Of course, I'm just glad I don't look more like your identical twin.

__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:47 PM   #2197
Aloha Mr. Learned Hand
Moderator
 
Aloha Mr. Learned Hand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: All American Burger
Posts: 1,446
Advice

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall



TM
To paraphrase Richard Roeper, isn't it a wonderful world when it's highly likely a Best Actor Oscar(tm) will go to either this guy ^^^^,

or this guy v v v v v v?



Aloha Mr. Learned Hand is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:50 PM   #2198
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
If it were a complaint about the rules it wouldn't be so bad. But it's not. It's a complaint about the Yankees over and over again for being successful within those rules. Instead of people calling for a salary cap, which would make sense (and I am in full support of), they say, "Tax the Yankees!" The Yankees represent all that is evil. No. The owners (probably even Steinbrenner) would be all for a salary cap. It's because of the union that it will never happen.

And someone needs to beat the shit out of Ben Affleck. People from Boston should be ashamed that they run to that dumbass whenever the Red Sox get fucked.

TM
Of course it's a complaint about the rules. We don't hate Darth Vader because he blew up Alderan (sp?). We hate him because he epitomizes the evil that is the Empire.

Dickering about a salary cap is symptomatic. The problem is that revenue is more local than national in origin, and there are huge disparities between the localities. Steinbrenner paid more for his franchise because it was worth more, and A-Rod is worth more to the Yankees than he would be to any other team because they get more return on him. You can't solve this problem without transferring a lot of money from rich teams to poor teams, and forcing the latter to pay people more. None of this seems likely as long as the commissioner is a bobble-head doll, and absent darker storm clouds not just on the horizon, but overhead.

Ben Affleck has lost his status as a Bostonian now that he has participated in a NASCAR event. See ya.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:51 PM   #2199
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
Quote:
Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
Brosnan will be back.
You're going to take the word of the National Enquirer over a bunch of Bond geeks who've built a slick website dedicated to this issue?

All I can say is that this looks like the basis for the "still 007" rumor, and it doesn't sound very definitive.

ETA: Of course, these Bond geeks say YMMV.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 06:54 PM   #2200
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Advice

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Of course, I'm just glad I don't look more like your identical twin.

What's the matter? Too lazy to find the guy with the really big lips?

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 07:03 PM   #2201
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
And someone needs to beat the shit out of Ben Affleck. People from Boston should be ashamed that they run to that dumbass whenever the Red Sox get fucked.
For this among many other reasons, yes.

I've never understood how Affleck has managed to become a celebrity spokesman for the Red Sox. (Any sports network or show with an ounce of self-respect playing clips of Affleck holding forth on the subject should do so only when coupled with subsequent ridicule).

Unless and until he plays Theo Epstein in the TNT Original Worthless Movie of The Week on the subject, I could not care less about that dumbshit's views on anything related to baseball.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 07:13 PM   #2202
LessinSF
Wearing the cranky pants
 
LessinSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,120
Obscure Reality TV

A british version of The Surreal Life with 10 people I haven't heard of, Sarah Kozer from Joe Millionaire (the bondage/slurper), and Uri Geller. http://www.five.tv/programmes/backtoreality/

RR/RW Challenge:

s
p
o
i
l
e
r

Can't say I was sorry to see Trishelle leave. She had proven herself to be a clueless psycho, but not quite as bad as Robin or Amaya (wonder how she feels to learn that Colin from RW Hawaii is gay). That said, Coral needs to go too.
__________________
Boogers!
LessinSF is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 07:15 PM   #2203
ThrashersFan
Puck You
 
ThrashersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrounded by idiots and assholes.
Posts: 1,076
tongue in chic

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob

Speaking of hockey, you all should go see "Miracle." Even Mrs. Not Bob -- who prefers baseball to hockey -- liked it.
I feel sad for her because she feels a need to prefer one over the other. I have been blessed with the ability to feel full out love for both sports and still have room for NASCAR. This is a rough time of year for me -- three overlapping sports. Oh well, sleep is for the weak anyway.

Just in case anyone forgot, I like to "do the nasty" while watching my sports so my husband is always pleased when my sports overlap.
__________________
When you say Budweiser you've said it all.
ThrashersFan is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 07:18 PM   #2204
str8outavannuys
I am beyond a rank!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow, natch.
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I suggest you call up Ted Gayer -- the Georgetown professor who wrote the study -- and point that out. You might save him some embarrassment. Also, you should call Kip Viscusi, the Harvard professor who edits the journal where it appeared, the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. I'm sure he'd be glad to hear about it, too.
I remember reading a piece that responded to a famous Viscusi article about how we shouldn't tax cigarettes, if anything we should subsidize them for all the money they save (pensions, etc.) from unproductive old people dying earlier than they otherwise would.

Last edited by str8outavannuys; 02-17-2004 at 07:36 PM..
str8outavannuys is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 07:20 PM   #2205
str8outavannuys
I am beyond a rank!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow, natch.
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Don't have to. I was referring to Easterboy's guesses:

"The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty does not speculate much about why SUVs and pickup trucks crash so much more frequently than regular cars, but the guesses are obvious. First, SUVs and pickups are styled to look cinematically menacing, and thus bring out the worst in drivers, visually egging them on to be hostile and aggressive. Second, owners of SUVs, especially, may falsely believe their vehicles have superior handling or road-holding power. Actually SUVs as a group are less stable than regular cars--as evidenced by roll-overs--because their high centers of gravity more than wipe out any benefits that four-wheel drive may confer. Finally, those sitting at the wheels of SUVs and pickup trucks may drive like lunatics, yakking into the cell phone all the while, because they themselves have fallen for the propaganda about SUVs being safer than regular cars."
Did anyone see last week's ER episode about the guy who had a heart attack while driving his Hummer and killed a bunch of people? 'Twas written by my sister-in-law. She and my brother don't much care for SUVs. Liberal media bias indeed.

Str(still driving the white horse)8
str8outavannuys is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.