Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 - Page 1501

Aloha Mr. Learned Hand · 09-10-2003, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Are you impressed, or repulsed?

It's kind of a sliding scale, starting at impressed and moving rapidly to repulsed when you realize that instead of pointing out her dessert on the dessert cart she's cartjacked it and is stuffing the whole thing into her gaping (there's that word again) piehole...

And for the record, my current priorities are:

1. Sex
1. Mrs. Hand and the little fingers
3. Football (Pro and College)
4. Sex
5. Booze
6. Good Food
7. Sex
8. Pining for hockey season
9. High-end electronics (Especially Plasma HDTV's, stereo equipment and XM).
10. European Sportscars
11. Sex
12. Porn (see Sex, infra. and supra.)
13. Sex
14. Planning Vegas trip (see Sex and Porn)
15. Work (though the people I work with don't agree)

robustpuppy · 09-10-2003, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
the sweet feeling of rubbing Not Bob's nose in my cup will make my outing worthwhile

Admit it, you really are a perv under that mid-800s FICO score.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 09-10-2003, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
I'd ask you to send me the sperm, but I don't want the father of my kids to be so obnoxious.

Hey TM, maybe you could oblige me.

I was recommending to PJ that she, despite her continual knocking of "having rugrats", not write off the idea of having children. Surprise (or do I need a Harvard study)! Some of us enjoy it.

My suggestion to PJ is a compliment. I'm sure she'd be a fine parent someday, if she so chooses.

BUT PLEASE DON'T MISINTERPRET ME.

You clearly should not all breed.

leagleaze · 09-10-2003, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I was recommending to PJ that she, despite her continual knocking of "having rugrats", not write off the idea of having children. Surprise (or do I need a Harvard study)! Some of us enjoy it.

My suggestion to PJ is a compliment. I'm sure she'd be a fine parent someday, if she so chooses.

BUT PLEASE DON'T MISINTERPRET ME.

You clearly should not all breed.

I refer you to Bilmore's post to TM.

Unfortunately, it is too late to do something about the people who bred but ought not have.

ThrashersFan · 09-10-2003, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Admit it, you really are a perv under that mid-800s FICO score.

Hockey makes me crazy hot. As does baseball. And pro football. And NASCAR. I suppose that I do tend to get a little pervy.

edit: I just received word that post-season Braves tickets go on sale Friday. I think I will now go home and fuck the old man really crazy like.

bilmore · 09-10-2003, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I was recommending to PJ that she, despite her continual knocking of "having rugrats", not write off the idea of having children. Surprise (or do I need a Harvard study)! Some of us enjoy it.

My suggestion to PJ is a compliment. I'm sure she'd be a fine parent someday, if she so chooses.

BUT PLEASE DON'T MISINTERPRET ME.

You clearly should not all breed.

GGG, when people are making fun of your life choices, it is not appropriate to make fun of their life choices, because we shouldn't make fun of people's life choices

Now my head hurts.

Replaced_Texan · 09-10-2003, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I think you're right, and I bet Nigella Lawson is a tiger in bed.

Oooh, I have a girl-crush on Nigella Lawson. Usually I only like about half of the recipes in a cookbook, but practically everything that I've ever seen in one of her books is mouth watering. And not one of the recipes has failed. Her descriptions are fantastic, and I can't wait to make more from her books.

notcasesensitive · 09-10-2003, 06:45 PM

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ero/index.html

[If you couldn't tell from the link description, article about how sucky Lisa G. is at sidelines commentary.]

NotFromHere · 09-10-2003, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Both. I like being around people who enjoy eating and the process of eating. And, if she eats like a pig and is still thin and hot, then I'm thinking "high metabolism = never will get fat".

You're probably going to have to rethink this.

If she eats like a pig and is still thin start thinking "eat like a pig=barfing in the ladies room."
In some instances. Especially the hot ones who think they want to be a model someday.

leagleaze · 09-10-2003, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
You're probably going to have to rethink this.

If she eats like a pig and is still thin start thinking "eat like a pig=barfing in the ladies room."
In some instances. Especially the hot ones who think they want to be a model someday.

Well that and metabolism changes.

leagleaze · 09-10-2003, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
GGG, when people are making fun of your life choices, it is not appropriate to make fun of their life choices, because we shouldn't make fun of people's life choices

Now my head hurts.

No, he should make fun. If he didn't make fun we wouldn't have any fun. And then where would we be? Not to mention how fair is it to make fun of someone's life choices and not to have your life choices mocked in return?

I think everyone should make fun of everyone. And their life choices. Whatever that means.

Want some aspirin?

notcasesensitive · 09-10-2003, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
Well that and metabolism changes.

Fucking metabolism changes. How do we repeal those?

Note: This is a rhetorical question, not a plea for exercise advice. So if you are frantically typing in a helpful response, fuck off already.

Shape Shifter · 09-10-2003, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ero/index.html

[If you couldn't tell from the link description, article about how sucky Lisa G. is at sidelines commentary.]

I liked this rationalization:

"Producer Fred Gaudelli told USA Today that, 'Since 40 percent of our Monday Night Football audience is women, our preference was to select a woman' to replace Stark on the broadcast."

Is Lisa Guerrero really what those 40% want to see?

NotFromHere · 09-10-2003, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Fucking metabolism changes. How do we repeal those?

Note: This is a rhetorical question, not a plea for exercise advice. So if you are frantically typing in a helpful response, fuck off already.

You have 3 choices really.
1. drugs. lots of drugs. to hell with food.
2. barfing (with Str8) in the ladies room. Ewww.
3. that thing you already discussed but didn't want my advice on.

ThrashersFan · 09-10-2003, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I liked this rationalization:

"Producer Fred Gaudelli told USA Today that, 'Since 40 percent of our Monday Night Football audience is women, our preference was to select a woman' to replace Stark on the broadcast."

Is Lisa Guerrero really what those 40% want to see?

Do they really believe that women who watch football want to see a woman on the sidelines? I just want somebody who knows what the fuck em is talking about -- can be male or female. Who are they fooling? They keep selecting women who are "hot" to the typical football-watching man, this has nothing to do with pleasing women viewers.