Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever!

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Dude, the difference between 6'2/195 and 6'4/230 is the difference between waking up at 7:00 and 8:00.

Exactly, but that wasn't my point.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
2, but a good warm up is important to any sporting activity.

That's as bad a rebuttal to her as ppnyc's earlier "every pot has a lid, so if I'm hot to someone, I'm hot to everyone."

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
The anorexics or the shit eaters?

So I've got fetishes. Who are you to judge?

Or worse yet, the bulimic shit-eaters.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
What I wouldn't give to wake up at 8:00.

What I wouldn't give to wake up at 7:00.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Or nursing. Or bought her implants at Costco ("buying in bulk saves you $$$!").

But we're letting this go now. Didn't you get the memo?

Generally speaking the hugeosity of the breasts themselves determines the cup size and the number is the around-the-chest-under the actual breasts. I guess maybe someone who grew up on top of Mount Everest might have really overdeveloped lungs that caused the rib cage to expand that much. But normally, it's just fat.

I do not acquiesce in the FB's memorandum decision.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
It was some beastiality site. The distubing part was the FAQs for beastiality newbers. I still get a little queasy thinking about that.

Oh, the one about the "knot." Yeh, I don't look at that before sex.











anymore.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That's as bad a rebuttal to her as ppnyc's earlier "every pot has a lid, so if I'm hot to someone, I'm hot to everyone."

I didn't really say that. I meant in my circuitous way that hot is very subjective.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by spookyfish
Or worse yet, the bulimic shit-eaters.

I draw the line there. That's just disgusting.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Generally speaking the hugeosity of the breasts themselves determines the cup size and the number is the around-the-chest-under the actual breasts. I guess maybe someone who grew up on top of Mount Everest might have really overdeveloped lungs that caused the rib cage to expand that much. But normally, it's just fat.

I do not acquiesce in the FB's memorandum decision.

What is your bra size and your size size? since we're all asking or I'm asking. How tall are you? let's discusss.

[Adder]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Dude, the difference between 6'2/195 and 6'4/230 is the difference between waking up at 7:00 and 8:00.

When it comes to the Napolean types? Bullshit. I am smaller than you and more than capable of being physically intimidating when necessary.

ETA: Hate it when partners call in mid-posting.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by Adder
When it comes to the Napolean types? Bullshit. I am smaller than you can more than capable of being physically intimidating when necessary.

I think you've been reading too many of ppnyc's posts.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
What is your bra size and your size size? since we're all asking or I'm asking. How tall are you? let's discusss.

Recall that I said I spoke from experience (or something clearly to that effect) w/r/t 38 on a short person meaning fattie (or, I concede, possibly a skinny woman with a barrel chest). It's kind of somewhat immaterial because we all know I'm festive. And I have at best claimed to be "not unattractive."

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Recall that I said I spoke from experience (or something clearly to that effect) w/r/t 38 on a short person meaning fattie (or, I concede, possibly a skinny woman with a barrel chest). It's kind of somewhat immaterial because we all know I'm festive. And I have at best claimed to be "not unattractive."

ahhh. I see. Well, we've gone over the whole recalibration thing. I am now destined to be ranked as butt and fat and so be it. it is what it is.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
I didn't really say that. I meant in my circuitous way that hot is very subjective.

Circuitous? Ahem...

And Noah Webster's still spinning from your expansion of "very."

You have been fascinating to me because you've demonstrated just how far the ambitious, or desperate, can bend semantics to avoid the simple meaning of a absolutely clear and very even-handed commentary. There's a sort of curve where the words get so warped no one can argue with you anymore. The problem is, that's about the same point where the people reading them give up on trying and default back to the simple meaning of the simple words that started the whole thing.

More circular than circuitous.

[Jack Manfred]

Have we forgotten how much I suck at poker?

Plus, that line SS made about me having nice hair wasn't a reference to ppnyc, it was a critique of my back hair.

Seriously people, focus on the target.