» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 252 |
0 members and 252 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
07-30-2007, 04:35 PM
|
#2371
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
What does this mean?
Via James Wolcott, this is from the end of Vanity Fair's profile of Rudy Giuliani:
- The position of "Mrs. Giuliani" has not historically been a secure post. Although the candidate has lately been warned by advisers to avoid any hint of scandal, there is a sense that perhaps he is not listening. "Does a leopard change its spots?" says one close friend. Recently, Starr Shephard, a Texan who informs me she used to be on the "U.S. world team of rhythmic twirling gymnastics," emerged in The National Enquirer, which ran a story suggesting she might be a Giuliani love interest. "I am not having an affair with Rudy Giuliani. I do not need a political power stick," the 36-year-old redhead says when I call her. "I believe in his vision and his voice even if I do not believe in his family."
"What do you mean by that?" I wonder.
"Oh, you know, you hear things about his family," she replies.
Says Wolcott (who also writes for VF):
- I have no idea what this strange contortionist is intimating about the family, but I am relieved that Rudy's leopard-spotted power stick has not fallen into her twirling hands. Such a scandal would only serve to upstage Jeri Thompson's snowy Alps, which, I'm sure David Gergen would agree, is not the direction this country wants to go.
link
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 03:07 AM
|
#2372
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
This is exactly the violence-as-romantic, backward view that predominates no matter how educated or sophisticated a Muslim becomes.
|
Which asserted basis for initiating the Iraq war did you find persuasive?
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 02:04 PM
|
#2373
|
Classified
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
|
Jesus.
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I make these posts solely to see whether you or I are the bigger joke.
Your response proves that you are, yet again, my superior.
|
Yeah -- but you're like Avis.
S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#2374
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 04:26 PM
|
#2375
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
this just in:
- Lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm that's home to Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr and Bush administration official Jay Lefkowitz, have given more to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign than to all of the top Republican candidates combined.
Bloomberg
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 04:59 PM
|
#2376
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
this just in:
- Lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm that's home to Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr and Bush administration official Jay Lefkowitz, have given more to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign than to all of the top Republican candidates combined.
Bloomberg
|
of course. do you know how much starr billed? if she were actually President, in 2 years every partner there will be buying ocean front vacation homes. Can you imagine the shit she'd get up to?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 11:55 AM
|
#2377
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
"and I love his position on the Federal Reserve"
Ron Paul ad (mostlySFW) -- discuss.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 04:31 PM
|
#2378
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
David Vitter, take notes.
- "I say one thing to you out loud. How many deputies go to bed with prostitutes? It's not a crime. Of course I identify with Christian values but what have those got to do with going to bed with a prostitute? This is a private matter."
link
I'm a little surprised that the Ron Paul thing didn't get a reaction, but I guess people expect to see the lesbian action on the FB, not here.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 10:37 AM
|
#2379
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Okay, CAIR, the entity that fights every step taken here to highlight the insanity the Jihadis want, has engaged it's hired gun to stop free speech once again:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/0...obert-spencer/
here's the thing, CAIR's shill is also General Counsel for the DNC. Once we get to the election you'll lose again, not because the Rs will defame your candidate's weakness on terror, but because your own Party needs to be so "big umbrella" that you actually would be. You GC is CAIR's attorney. that is scary.
Bonus points: how many think Obama would invade Pakistan?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 11:14 AM
|
#2380
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
CAIR's shill is also General Counsel for the DNC. Once we get to the election you'll lose again, not because the Rs will defame your candidate's weakness on terror, but because your own Party needs to be so "big umbrella" that you actually would be. You GC is CAIR's attorney. that is scary.
|
You're going to hold his legal clients against the party? Quick, someone get me a copy of Fred Thompson's talking points. "The flies buzz louder in the summer." There we go.
__________________
的t was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:35 PM
|
#2381
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You're going to hold his legal clients against the party? Quick, someone get me a copy of Fred Thompson's talking points. "The flies buzz louder in the summer." There we go.
|
I enjoy that he is citing to a blog.
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:38 PM
|
#2382
|
Classified
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Bonus points: how many think Obama would invade Pakistan?
|
Depends on the facts -- probably less likely to do so than Hillary.
But that's pretty much irrelevant because I can guarantee you that whoever the next President may be won't invade Pakistan.
We simply can't do it while we're in Iraq and Afghanistan. We would be all but physically incapable of doing so within two years even if we immediately withdrew from Iraq.
It will take the Army years to recover from where we are now to the pre-Iraq condition. And everyone knows it.
S_A_M
P.S. The "Young Americans for Freedom" are a bunch of ball-sucking (NTTAWWT) wild-eyed, lunatics -- much like their leftist counterparts.
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:42 PM
|
#2383
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Cletus Miller
I enjoy that he is citing to a blog.
|
i linked the guy's firm bio, and the actual CAIR letter.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#2384
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Depends on the facts -- probably less likely to do so than Hillary.
But that's pretty much irrelevant because I can guarantee you that whoever the next President may be won't invade Pakistan.
We simply can't do it while we're in Iraq and Afghanistan. We would be all but physically incapable of doing so within two years even if we immediately withdrew from Iraq.
It will take the Army years to recover from where we are now to the pre-Iraq condition. And everyone knows it.
S_A_M
P.S. The "Young Americans for Freedom" are a bunch of ball-sucking (NTTAWWT) wild-eyed, lunatics -- much like their leftist counterparts.
|
What do you have against ball-sucking? Wow.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:51 PM
|
#2385
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
why you will not win, or if you do, we all lose
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
i linked the guy's firm bio, and the actual CAIR letter.
|
This is the only link in your post:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/...robert-spencer/
Not his firm bio. Perhaps a mistake?
ETA: Or you're the poster "Bryan" at hotair.com?
Last edited by Cletus Miller; 08-02-2007 at 12:53 PM..
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|