LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 622
0 members and 622 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-08-2005, 04:37 PM   #2386
mmm3587
Fast left eighty slippy
 
mmm3587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,236
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Ask Richard Hatch.
What a dumbass that guy was. I'm surprised that CBS even paid him the whole amount without withholding. But it serves him right. Anyone dumb enough not to realize that they're going to catch up with you for shit as egregious as that deserves to get fucked.
mmm3587 is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:40 PM   #2387
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by mmm3587
I was aware that the mortgage interest deduction gets phased out, but the state and local income tax stuff does, too? Ugh. Still, I would take the extra income to put me over that hump, I guess. If you made me. If it was absolutely necessary that I get paid more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SelfTimmy: "were"
"I were aware . . . .":?

Sounds wrong.
bilmore is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:41 PM   #2388
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I received a chunk of non-cash income and just totally forgot to declare it.
I think your bigger problem is going to be with your partners, who are wondering a) why they didn't get a share of the blow jobs you received in lieu of fees and b) how exactly they should be valued.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:42 PM   #2389
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
I'd buy gwink's love.

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Ask Richard Hatch.
Admittedly, the "prove that I have any gambling winnings, IRS dude" approach is somewhat flawed when one wins one's million dollars on national television.

(yet another song related re line. sorry, paigow)
Not Bob is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:42 PM   #2390
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by mmm3587
That's my approach to cash gambling winnings. I wonder how hardcore the audit would be on that. I don't know that "Well, if you look at all the cash withdrawals I made during that tax year, you'll see that I withdrew X dollars, and you'll see that total cash deposits during that time were less than X. So I had no gambling winnings. Yes, I only use cash for gambling. And never for anything else."
I'd never lie on my taxes, but I'm certainly not going to look really closely to make sure uncle sam gets every nickel he wants. If I miss something, it'll be something I owe, not something I'm owed, but it'll be small enough that no one would give a shit anyway.

I have a friend with a business who basically just lies on his taxes year in year out. He claims as long as he steals only 20k or so a year, no one will ever bother. Is there a cut off like the SEC stuff (won't look at you for insider info unless you have really large suspicious trades or a part of a huge wave of sudden suspicious trades)?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:43 PM   #2391
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I think your bigger problem is going to be with your partners, who are wondering a) why they didn't get a share of the blow jobs you received in lieu of fees and b) how exactly they should be valued.
If you know anything about me, you know that would be phantom income.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:44 PM   #2392
ABBAKiss
Genius Known As ABBAKiss
 
ABBAKiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 3,540
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by mmm3587
I was aware that the mortgage interest deduction gets phased out, but the state and local income tax stuff does, too? Ugh. Still, I would take the extra income to put me over that hump, I guess. If you made me. If it was absolutely necessary that I get paid more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SelfTimmy: "were"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I were aware . . . .":?

Sounds wrong.
If it were absolutely necessary that I get paid more. Although, it is ALWAYS absolutely necessary that *I* get paid more so.....
ABBAKiss is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:45 PM   #2393
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If you know anything about me, you know that would be phantom income.
from what I know about you, I would never have expected to see "phantom income" in one of your posts. Plus, that's just a little too clever.

Sigh.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:46 PM   #2394
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Is there a cut off like the SEC stuff (won't look at you for insider info unless you have really large suspicious trades or a part of a huge wave of sudden suspicious trades)?
I know someone who audited. I don't know how they get to "you're being audited," but once you're on the list they go like hell to catch you cheating. They get evaluated by % of cheats they catch- and they have a target %.

That is, they won't ignore a "minor" cheat.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:52 PM   #2395
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I don't know how they get to "you're being audited," . . .
Two step process:

1. "Are you a lawyer?"

2. "Do you own a business?"

(Answer both "yes", and you get the Platinum card.)
bilmore is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:57 PM   #2396
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I totally understand the "oh, I'll just ignore that provision" attitude toward the tax thing. I did something like that last year. I received a chunk of non-cash income and just totally forgot to declare it. Now I don't know what to do about it. But I'm not going to say shit about it now. The way I see it, its too late. Let the fuckers litigate with me if they like.
It's not too late until the three year statute of limitations passes. It's a 6 year S/L if they can allege fraud, which is easier to do with non-cash items. And of course, there's also the interest and penalties which rack up until you pay.

But if you're more comfortable not filing an amended return, then fuck 'em. I think only about a couple thousand lawyers get their licenses suspended or pulled for tax issues every year. It's not like it's your livelihood or real money on the line or anything.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 04:59 PM   #2397
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
But if you're more comfortable not filing an amended return, then fuck 'em. I think only about a couple thousand lawyers get their licenses suspended or pulled for tax issues every year. It's not like it's your livelihood or real money on the line or anything.
Heck, you get suspended for non-knowing tax violations. Imagine what they do with the knowing stuff?

But, the forms are a pain.

(P.S. Uh, it wasn't something that someone else expensed, was it?)
bilmore is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 05:00 PM   #2398
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
It's not too late until the three year statute of limitations passes. It's a 6 year S/L if they can allege fraud, which is easier to do with non-cash items. And of course, there's also the interest and penalties which rack up until you pay.

But if you're more comfortable not filing an amended return, then fuck 'em. I think only about a couple thousand lawyers get their licenses suspended or pulled for tax issues every year. It's not like it's your livelihood or real money on the line or anything.
You gotta polish your marketing.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 05:00 PM   #2399
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
I'd buy gwink's love.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
Admittedly, the "prove that I have any gambling winnings, IRS dude" approach is somewhat flawed when one wins one's million dollars on national television.

(yet another song related re line. sorry, paigow)
The approach is also somewhat flawed when the Tax Court judge tells you that the IRS gets the presumption of correctness on unreported income and the taxpayer has the burden of showing real income was less.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 03-08-2005, 05:01 PM   #2400
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
I KNOW, TAKE IT TO THE TAX REFUND BOARD

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'd never lie on my taxes, but I'm certainly not going to look really closely to make sure uncle sam gets every nickel he wants. If I miss something, it'll be something I owe, not something I'm owed, but it'll be small enough that no one would give a shit anyway.

I have a friend with a business who basically just lies on his taxes year in year out. He claims as long as he steals only 20k or so a year, no one will ever bother. Is there a cut off like the SEC stuff (won't look at you for insider info unless you have really large suspicious trades or a part of a huge wave of sudden suspicious trades)?
There are things you can do to make it more likely you will get audited (e.g., win $million on TV and then have less than $1m in income -- or, your tax return doesn't match your W-2), but you can always get audited. And "oh I forgot" doesn't usually make the IRS waive penalties and interest. If whoever paid you the cash reported it to the IRS, they are more likely to audit you (because your return won't match what they have on file for you).

ETA hey, look, seriously, what can they do to you? It's just the IRS. I think you are absolutely taking the right approach. You and mmmmmm. Kudos to both of you.

Last edited by ltl/fb; 03-08-2005 at 05:04 PM..
ltl/fb is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.