Fashion Board 1-08-04 through 02-03-04

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by spookyfish
Let's test my memory here. I assumed (c) wasn't Mrs. str8 because you said that she bore a bit of a resemblance to Erika (and not Jun) from the last season of Big Brother

What do I win for paying attention?

he was talking about when you see them both naked. it had to do with a birth mark hard on the inner, upper thigh. Remember, the guy's hooked up. He's seen the audition photos.

Mrs. str8 is Jewish. c is not.

[Anne Elk]

11 year old gives birth. Father is 26 year old former neighbor.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Only when responding to someone I like.

I do not like NWNative. And so, I do not care to please him.

A discriminating manpleaser? Is that not an oxymoron?

[andViolins]

Originally posted by Anne Elk
11 year old gives birth. Father is 26 year old former neighbor.

The last line of the article is very troubling:

"If convicted of having sexual relations with a minor, the father faces a maximum prison sentence of three years."

Um, I guess there isn't a Ukranian word for rape?

aV

[Anne Elk]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Yeah. Remember when the olympics on tv meant sports, rather than barbara walters-style interviews with figure sk8ers and curlers who rose to stardom from the depths of the Vancouver 'hood?

Oh well, already unexcited about the Greece olympics.

Yeah, the good ole days. I remember, way back, they even used to show events live. Not the pre-packaged, mini-made-for-TV-movies that the Olympics have become.

Good sporting events generate their own drama, if it needs to be manufactured by some Director/Producer/Sponsor behind the scenes then it wasn't worth watching in the first place.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Anne Elk
11 year old gives birth. Father is 26 year old former neighbor.

The maximum three-year prison sentence is some deterent. Perhaps the OC love birds should move to Ukraine.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by andViolins
The last line of the article is very troubling:

"If convicted of having sexual relations with a minor, the father faces a maximum prison sentence of three years."

Um, I guess there isn't a Ukranian word for rape?

aV

Um, I think even US statutes actually use phrases such as "sexual relations" rather than "rape." Um, particuarly in stuff like statutory rape, because the mere word "rape" implies force/lack of consent and neither force nor lack of consent are necessary elements of statutory rape.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Not to mention the Everwood plotline involving the 16-yr-old kid getting romantically involved with (but not having intercourse with) his baby sister's 21-yr-old babysitter, and everyone yapping about how it's illegal. First of all, there's no sex so it can't be statutory rape. Second of all, and more importantly, under Colorado law (CO being the state in which all of the action takes place) if the minor is 15 or older it's not statutory rape if the non-minor is fewer than 10 years older than the minor.

Irritated the crap out of me. It may be a sign that I'm too old to be watching this stuff, but oh well.

Standards on the WB are slipping. Back in the day, Pacy just went ahead and banged his English teacher.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
The maximum three-year prison sentence is some deterent. Perhaps the OC love birds should move to Ukraine.

EVERWOOD. It's not even the same network.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Standards on the WB are slipping. Back in the day, Pacy just went ahead and banged his English teacher.

I never watched that show much. But good to know. Maybe the whole Everwood subplot is some kind of misguided penance. Did Buffy ever do Giles?

[purse junkie]

Originally posted by NW Native
Bite me.Please

Lines like this do not get the chicks. But then, I suspect that long, sad experience at too many "Ladies' Nights" has taught you this.

[Pretty Little Flower]

[cliche]Greetings, grasshoppers. I just got the memo indicating that using fake html codes is totally past its sell-by date and is conclusive proof that the poster doing same is phoning it in. Carry on. Indeed.[/cliche]

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
A discriminating manpleaser? Is that not an oxymoron?

Dtb, we need some very basic work here.

Note, "manpleaser" is singular, not plural. Note that if multiple men are involved, as opposed to multiple pleasings or multiple women doing the pleasing, the plural is irregular ("skank"). By definition, a manpleaser is discriminating.

[NW Native]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Only when responding to someone I like.

I do not like NWNative. And so, I do not care to please him.

Your behavior indicates the opposite.

I suggest ignoring someone you don't like.

HTH

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Mrs. str8 is Jewish. c is not.

I'm no hebrewphile, but isn't Judaism the kind of thing that you can join? Then isn't appearance, while certainly correlative of Jewishness, not definitive?

Also, (d) looks kind of possessive of (c), like a newly married man might be of his hipster Asian Jewish wife, but I am sticking with (f). (b) is my darkhorse, though, as maybe str8 was all excited thinking about how he was going to describe his trivictory here.