Missing the Paigow (et al.) [sniff]

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
The drapes don't always match the curtains. I dated a blonde (um...guy) for 5 years and it took me 4 of them to get used to the fact that he had red pubes** and leg hair, while everything else was blonde (including the eyebrows).

**Helping me accept the reds was the huge, perfectly formed gigantor sticking out of them.

My boyfriend is a redhead (first one I have ever dated) and it took me a while too. It's just kind of unexpected, I guess. You expect them to be normal down there, not glowing like a stop sign.

[dtb]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Me?

I meant besides you, of course.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
The drapes don't always match the curtains. I dated a blonde (um...guy) for 5 years and it took me 4 of them to get used to the fact that he had red pubes** and leg hair, while everything else was blonde (including the eyebrows).

**Helping me accept the reds was the huge, perfectly formed gigantor sticking out of them.

Did it have freckles on it?

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Did it have freckles on it?

Dunno. It was covered 99% of the time. With my lips.

Which are freckle-less.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Dunno. It was covered 99% of the time. With my lips.

Must not have been that big, then.

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Must not have been that big, then.

The ratio was good.

[pony_trekker]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If by kool aid you mean money, I've had that taste. I lucked into a big one a few years back from the plaintiff's side. I understand the addictive "casino" aspect of it.

If you mean that silly nonsense about being Clarence Darrow or agents of social change and righteous crusaders against Evil Business, Inc., that is just a fiction for the public, isn't it? I mean, (in Rob Cordrry voice) "commmmme onnnnn...." Nobody actually believes that shiite.

No quite the contrary. If you're in it for the money a jury will see right through you. And so will the clients. Well, the ones with good cases who can shop lawyers.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
The ratio was good.

Of what? Your mouth coverage to his visible cock?

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Exaggeration. Some of my best friends (no, really) sue actual or potential clients of mine.

I was just grousing about the particular plaintiff's lawyer in my case (who is a nice enough guy, personally, and we haven't had any discovery spats) because his theory of the case is so different from the way my client is looking at it.

"So what?" you say. "Who cares if he looks at it differently? Can't we all just get along?" Well, I care. It meant that I worked this weekend instead of going to the Vitalis Bowl.

The Viagra Bowl? What is Vitalis and what makes it worthy of Bowl namingship? This whole corporate sponsorship thing is ridiculous.

Let's check out the Pepsi Instant Replay on the Pizza Hut Viewcam, Bob.

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Of what? Your mouth coverage to his visible cock?

my big mouth: his big cock.

Clearly you don't read Politics.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Bernie Ebbers deserves five years - not 25. His was a clearly political and very "zero tolerance" minded sentence. Did he not deserve a downward departure for all the money he made for people in WorldCom's run up? Why wasn't that cash netted against the amount on which his sentence was based? Seems equitable, no? I lost money because of people like Bernie, but I knew those investments were risky. I could bark about how Gary Winnick should go to jail, but in the end, I have no one to blame but myself.

Whatever happened to assumption of risk?

You are insane.

Assumption of risk? I'm not assuming the risk that the people running the companies in which I have stock are out-and-out criminals. I'm assuming the risk that they're stupid or incompetent, but that's enough, thank you very much.

All those motherfuckers should do hard time in a regular jail. You want to reduce corporate crime (yez, this is a tangent), do away with country club jails altogether. If you steal a purse with $50 in it, you go to a fuck-me-up-the-ass prison. If you steal $10,000,000, you go to a jail with no walls? That's some bullshit.

TM

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
my big mouth: his big cock.

Clearly you don't read Politics.

I see. So when Hank says he doesn't want a woman with a big mouth, he's speaking literally?

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Dude, I can't handle another "try and."

"Try TO..."

"Try TO..."

Try and stop him.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by pony_trekker
No quite the contrary. If you're in it for the money a jury will see right through you. And so will the clients. Well, the ones with good cases who can shop lawyers.

I don't buy that. There'd be a tiny sliver of good PI guys out there. I personally know guys who've hit huge cases who couldn't care less about their clients.

BTW, what does a jury do in a commercial case, where counsel are in it for the money, and both sides are in it for the money?

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You are insane.

Assumption of risk? I'm not assuming the risk that the people running the companies in which I have stock are out-and-out criminals. I'm assuming the risk that they're stupid or incompetent, but that's enough, thank you very much.

All those motherfuckers should do hard time in a regular jail. You want to reduce corporate crime (yez, this is a tangent), do away with country club jails altogether. If you steal a purse with $50 in it, you go to a fuck-me-up-the-ass prison. If you steal $10,000,000, you go to a jail with no walls? That's some bullshit.

TM

I completely agree with this.