Meet your new thread, same as the old thread.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I've answered all this, other than to say i am surprised you think it okay for cops to arrest people for proposing sexual congress between consenting adults.

You didn't know what the fuck happened, so you couldn't have answered it.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't understand why the police in the Minneapolis airport are arresting people for what he did. It doesn't strike me as a crime, and you would think they could find something better to do.

The only reason this particular bit of behavior should be taken seriously is because of Craig's take on Monica and Bill.

I am gravely disappointed, however, that I now must write to my old torts professor and suggest that he adjust some grades. After all, he had taught us "there's no harm in asking", and that turns out to be wrong.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The only reason this particular bit of behavior should be taken seriously is because of Craig's take on Monica and Bill.

Monica was working for Bill. Craig was out looking for congress with consenting adults.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you were truly a champion of gay rights, you would be bothered that he got arrested at all. say if, before you got married, you were in the Minneapolis airport, you saw a really hot woman, and maybe she liked you, you said "hey let's go behind that ticket booth over there and get busy- kill 5 minutes" You should be arrested? how is it different? the proposed sex was homo so he should get arrested? Sup Ct. said that don't go.

And I don't have a problem with the story being published, I just am curious if the tone of the posts here don't imply that the fact he might be gay is the underlying joke. If these guys have some other motivation, they should proceed. I'm just trying to keep it clean in case ncs' friends ever do stop to read here.

I assume you're joking by using "should." Clearly, you know I have no issue with public sex. But it is illegal, even in a bathroom. Gay, straight or whatever.

Um, he is clearly gay, or bisexual. And that's not funny or unfunny. What's funny is that he was running around demonizing gays while he was clearly a homosexual or bisexual. The "funny" is in the hypcorisy, not where he sticks his dick.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I've answered all this, other than to say i am surprised you think it okay for cops to arrest people for proposing sexual congress between consenting adults.

If it's against the law to propose sexual congress in a bathroom, the officer was merely doing his job. I think that's a shitty law, and I think it was a flimsy case. But I also think the senator is a full of shit hypocrite who ought to be tarred and feathered for his two-faced bullshit. It's just that simple. If you say "Gay lifestyles are wrong" while you are leading a gay life, you are a hypocrite. And if you do it to pander for votes, you're a loathsome hypocrite.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
You didn't know what the fuck happened, so you couldn't have answered it.

no "fuck" happened.

Fortune 250 companies come to me and ask for my advice. You call lawyers and ask for their's, and then pay for it. you should learn to listen when I tell you stuff.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If it's against the law to propose sexual congress in a bathroom, the officer was merely doing his job. I think that's a shitty law, and I think it was a flimsy case. But I also think the senator is a full of shit hypocrite who ought to be tarred and feathered for his two-faced bullshit. It's just that simple. If you say "Gay lifestyles are wrong" while you are leading a gay life, you are a hypocrite. And if you do it to pander for votes, you're a loathsome hypocrite.

what law? I can ask someone for sex in the waiting area, but not the restroom? if there is a law your outrage should be there. I'm done. You lose. Next issue.

[LessinSF]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Monica was working for Bill. Craig was out looking for congress with consenting adults.

1. He, rightly or wrongly, pleaded guilty to a crime;

2. Roll Call, rightly, reported that a U.S. Senator pleaded guilty to a crime;

3. His past actions suggest he is a hypocrite;

4. If I was an Idaho voter, I would want to know this; and

5. I have no problem admitting that I take glee from watching a self-righteous hypocrite fall from grace in a humiliating, public fashion.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
ummm, are you aware of an Oregon Senator the Dems ran out because of simply making suggestive comments (allegedly) to an intern? Are you aware that the only proof the Dems had to run him off was his diary that showed when he was younger he actually had sex with an intern? Do you know at all of hisotry? Clinton's impeachment was simply the crows coming home to roost.

Clinton was repayment for Packwood? If not for Packwood's ouster, the GOP would never have spent $50 million chasing Bill Clinton into a corner about a blow job? Is that your position?

Packwood was a gnat. Clinton was targeted by Newt, who ushered in a form of Roveian partisanship years before Rove and that dimwit McRepublican we elected ever thought of running for office.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by LessinSF
1. He, rightly or wrongly, pleaded guilty to a crime;

2. Roll Call, rightly, reported that a U.S. Senator pleaded guilty to a crime;

3. His past actions suggest he is a hypocrite;

4. If I was an Idaho voter, I would want to know this; and

5. I have no problem admitting that I take glee from watching a self-righteous hypocrite fall from grace in a humiliating, public fashion.

4. is because he's a hypocrite or a fag? are you saying 4 from your standpoint or from the typical Idaho voter's, because i agree most Idaho voters want to know, but that's because they hate fags.

but why al the legs here? a politician is a hypocrite? okay, but it's been done to death already. I merely ask why these liberals keep posting it- I suggest they need to look into their own hearts and ask why. I know why they do it.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
what law? I can ask someone for sex in the waiting area, but not the restroom? if there is a law your outrage should be there. I'm done. You lose. Next issue.

What don't you understand about the word "if"? I said "if" it's against the law. If it's not against the law, well then I agree. I think arresting him was wrong.

But that's not even the issue, though you're trying to make it the issue because on the real issue - whether this man is a laughable hypocrite - you have no argument.

I'll move onto the next issue. Please define it for me first, since you have an endless bag of them you throw up to deflect or maneuver away from the real issue when cornered.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
What don't you understand about the word "if"? I said "if" it's against the law. If it's not against the law, well then I agree. I think arresting him was wrong.

But that's not even the issue, though you're trying to make it the issue because on the real issue - whether this man is a laughable hypocrite - you have no argument.

I'll move onto the next issue. Please define it for me first, since you have an endless bag of them you throw up to deflect or maneuver away from the real issue when cornered.

He's weird and annoying today.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield

Packwood was a gnat.

he was a man ruined for nothing. he was a dedicated senator who was forced to resign since his diary indicated he convinced an aide to fuck him. at long last do you have so little empathy that you can call him a gnat?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
4. is because he's a hypocrite or a fag? are you saying 4 from your standpoint or from the typical Idaho voter's, because i agree most Idaho voters want to know, but that's because they hate fags.

but why al the legs here? a politician is a hypocrite? okay, but it's been done to death already. I merely ask why these liberals keep posting it- I suggest they need to look into their own hearts and ask why. I know why they do it.

Because they hate gays?

I received this from TY earlier:

:Sebby,

:I hate gays. Almost as much as I hate Hank.
:GGG and SAM hate them a lot too.

:Long live Ruth Ginsburg,
:Ty

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
He's weird and annoying today.

As opposed to his usual coherence?