Implanting Bill Gates's Micro-chips In Brains For Over 20 Years!

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally Posted by Icky Thump

Clear your cookies.

Also, sometimes you can get through a paywall by going to the site in incognito mode.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Less was claiming California is somehow immune.

Not unless you do a really bad job of translating him from English into another language.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Not unless you do a really bad job of translating him from English into another language.

"More and more, I have less pity. Gun-friendly states, and their voters and children, reap what they sow."

Can you break down how you read this, in reference to a school shooting in Michigan?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

"More and more, I have less pity. Gun-friendly states, and their voters and children, reap what they sow."

Can you break down how you read this, in reference to a school shooting in Michigan?

Does it make sense to imply that Michigan is a gun-friendly state? Maybe, maybe not. Either way, it does not logically follow that (a) California is not a gun-friendly state, or (b) that Less believes that non-gun-friendly states are immune from gun violence (as opposed to, e.g., believing that whatever they reap, it is not what they sowed).

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Does it make sense to imply that Michigan is a gun-friendly state? Maybe, maybe not. Either way, it does not logically follow that (a) California is not a gun-friendly state, or (b) that Less believes that non-gun-friendly states are immune from gun violence (as opposed to, e.g., believing that whatever they reap, it is not what they sowed).

Also, when I linked a summary of school shooting per state, he did not accept that Cali is a dangerous place for school and he disputed the facts staring him in his face.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Also, when I linked a summary of school shooting per state, he did not accept that Cali is a dangerous place for school and he disputed the facts staring him in his face.

I don't really have a dog in this hunt, but he didn't say that on any post on this board.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

I don't really have a dog in this hunt, but he didn't say that on any post on this board.

Huh? Tell you what, maybe let Less speak for himself? He speaks closer to normal human than you.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Huh? Tell you what, maybe let Less speak for himself? He speaks closer to normal human than you.

He can speak for himself just fine, but apparently you can't read.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Huh? Tell you what, maybe let Less speak for himself? He speaks closer to normal human than you.

I think I see the problem here with this debate, or at least part of the problem:

Hank, you translate others’ posts from English into some other language, and you do so poorly. That means that what you are responding to is unlikely to be an accurate representation of what was actually said.

Ty, your language skills are far from those of normal humans, or at least farther from normal human language than is the case with some other posters here. It is therefore difficult to respond to what you are saying because it is hard to know what you would actually be saying if you spoke normal human, or at least close to normal human language.

I don’t know the solution, but I think the above problems may be why it appears you are talking past each other.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

He can speak for himself just fine, but apparently you can't read.

I remember you engaging in quote fights years ago, and thinking I can't imagine doing that, but now you sucked me in- Less, will you tell him how you feel about the amount of school gun violence in Cali?

"You claim credence for having a technical degree, yet you post this bullshit with raw figures. California has the largest population, so the amount of shootings is unsurprising."

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

I think I see the problem here with this debate, or at least part of the problem:

Hank, you translate others’ posts from English into some other language, and you do so poorly. That means that what you are responding to is unlikely to be an accurate representation of what was actually said.

Ty, your language skills are far from those of normal humans, or at least farther from normal human language than is the case with some other posters here. It is therefore difficult to respond to what you are saying because it is hard to know what you would actually be saying if you spoke normal human, or at least close to normal human language.

I don’t know the solution, but I think the above problems may be why it appears you are talking past each other.

What translation site did you use?

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

What translation site did you use?

I’d respond substantively, but I recently learned that, in addition to the problems I discussed in my earlier post, it has been discovered that you apparently are unable to read. Which makes me think that it is probably not all that helpful for me to spend time on a substantive response.

[LessinSF]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

I remember you engaging in quote fights years ago, and thinking I can't imagine doing that, but now you sucked me in- Less, will you tell him how you feel about the amount of school gun violence in Cali?

"You claim credence for having a technical degree, yet you post this bullshit with raw figures. California has the largest population, so the amount of shootings is unsurprising."

Ty has my proxy. I did not say that CA was immune, and I questioned your use of raw shooting numbers, rather than per capita or per victim.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

I think I see the problem here with this debate, or at least part of the problem:

Hank, you translate others’ posts from English into some other language, and you do so poorly. That means that what you are responding to is unlikely to be an accurate representation of what was actually said.

Ty, your language skills are far from those of normal humans, or at least farther from normal human language than is the case with some other posters here. It is therefore difficult to respond to what you are saying because it is hard to know what you would actually be saying if you spoke normal human, or at least close to normal human language.

I don’t know the solution, but I think the above problems may be why it appears you are talking past each other.

Klaatu barada nikto.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

I’d respond substantively, but I recently learned that, in addition to the problems I discussed in my earlier post, it has been discovered that you apparently are unable to read. Which makes me think that it is probably not all that helpful for me to spend time on a substantive response.

Here’s one, haha,

Q: How many Ty’s does it take to suck the life out of a lawyer’s anon chatting board?

A: One seems plenty capable-ha ha, get it? Ha!

JK