Fringey's taut-abbed painter

[SlaveNoMore]

Take it to the "Lawyers with Brats" Board already.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Take away gun privileges for like a whole week!

TM

Too harsh. A couple days without the Humvee, maybe . . .

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Take it to the "Lawyers with Brats" Board already.

I don't want that place cluttered up until I get more ideas for gifts for the kids on my list.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by bilmore
Ya know, he actually wasn't on smack. Daughter may not have had the expectation of privacy, for various reasons, but bf certainly did, at least by normal standards.

Daughter also has reasonable expectation of privacy.

The court ruled that the daughter and her boyfriend had a reasonable expectation of privacy on the phone. Washington state law prohibits intercepting or recording conversations without the consent of all participants.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by bilmore
Too harsh. A couple days without the Humvee, maybe . . .

In other news, Mike Tice is being considered for the Husky coaching job (sorry Fringey - I just had to).

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Take it to the "Lawyers with Brats" Board already.

Great. Now I'm hungry. Fucker.

(on the upside, now I've got a great name for the next Podunkville Bar Association tailgate party)

[Bad_Rich_Chic]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Either that or kids in Oregon are going to have to memorize and recite a notice of privacy practices every time they pick up the phone.

I'd be that's more likely. You use my phone, you play by my rules!

BR(grew up knowing I had no reasonable expectation of privacy from my parents of any kind in any place. No closed doors, no private conversations, no private correspondence, no property rights assertable against other members of household. Thank god my parents didn't figure out what redeye and cravings implied until I was out of the house or I'd have gone mad. The descriptions of my youth horrify the Mr., who grew up with parents who never asked him anything about school, his friends, etc. because it was intrusive.)C

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Daughter also has reasonable expectation of privacy.

Against her mother? I always thought that 4th amendment or whatever the fuck it is mumbo jumbo applied to governmental action. Since the daughter wasn't on trial and the issue wasn't whether the information could be used against her, she didn't.

Why don't you call your mom and hash this out with her?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Against her mother? I always thought that 4th amendment or whatever the fuck it is mumbo jumbo applied to governmental action. Since the daughter wasn't on trial (or was she an accessory?), I don't think she did, at least not in the legal sense.

Uh, I think this was based on a state law. But, whatever.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Against her mother? I always thought that 4th amendment or whatever the fuck it is mumbo jumbo applied to governmental action. Since the daughter wasn't on trial and the issue wasn't whether the information could be used against her, she didn't.

Why don't you call your mom and hash this out with her?

I suspect there's a state wiretapping law involved. Funny that it should apply to overheard conversations, though. And funny that it applies between parents and minors, considering that parents can be held financially responsible for many of their kids' acts.

eta: uh, what fringey said.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Uh, I think this was based on a state law. But, whatever.

Okay, law timmy! I realize there is a wiretapping/eavesdropping whatever got Linda Tripp in trouble type of law here, and that the issue was whether the information could be used against the bf at trial. But the R.E.P. concept used here is similar to the 4th amendment one, is it not? My point is that it seems inappropriate to say that there's the minor child has a REP at home as against her mother.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I suspect there's a state wiretapping law involved. Funny that it should apply to overheard conversations, though.

It applies to the rights of the BF in his crim trial. If daughter were simply overheard by mom in her own home while talking on the phone, well, different story.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Okay, law timmy! I realize there is a wiretapping/eavesdropping whatever got Linda Tripp in trouble type of law here, and that the issue was whether the information could be used against the bf at trial. But the R.E.P. concept used here is similar to the 4th amendment one, is it not?

OH MY GOD. You are a much bigger law timmy than I am, if you are relying on the phrasing of a paraphrase of an opinion to make this a federal constitutional issue.

someone, please, repost (and not just a link) the blowjob tips. Or something. This is killing me.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Against her mother? I always thought that 4th amendment or whatever the fuck it is mumbo jumbo applied to governmental action. Since the daughter wasn't on trial and the issue wasn't whether the information could be used against her, she didn't.

Why don't you call your mom and hash this out with her?

First of all, my mom has gone to the great beyond. There are no phones.

Second, it was not my mom who snooped in my sock drawer and found the stash, it was my friend's mom who found her stash (she is not as clever as I) and then grounded her right before the Stones concert that we had stood in line all day for tickets. It totally sucked.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
First of all, my mom has gone to the great beyond. There are no phones.

Second, it was not my mom who snooped in my sock drawer and found the stash, it was my friend's mom who found her stash (she is not as clever as I) and then grounded her right before the Stones concert that we had stood in line all day for tickets. It totally sucked.

Flinty, please stab me in the eye through the internet. Stab me hard enough to kill me. Thank you.