Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever!

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
His [Thurgreed's] irritating positions about whether I exist or not when we are quite probably both in close proximity and he could verify I find quite annoying--don't need to be a litigator to argue that point[s]. **Not that at this point I want to meet him, I do not.******I am a she, and I am not a deal atty.

:brick:

I was talking about [Thurgreed]. I know you are a she and not a lawyer. Mind like a steel trap, I have.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
:brick:

I was talking about [Thurgreed]. I know you are a she and not a lawyer. Mind like a steel trap, I have.

Maybe in the future you should be careful to refer to Thurgreed as "he" and ppnyc as "she"? That should be easy enough to follow.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Best post ever!

The funniest thing about you is that you act like you're best friends with posters like paigow, nfh and ppnyc. While you're really just egging them on to post more ridiculousness, all the while laughing at them behind their back. I'm many things that aren't so great, but at least I'm honest. And I'd rather make fun of someone to their face than turn them into a big joke when they turn the other way. Now that's real comedy. Woo hoo!

TM

You mischaracterise me.

1. My "relationship" with Paigow is not what you assert. While I am not above criticsing her, I am also fairly open with her and she knows what is what. There are plenty of places, or at least, where I weighed in on my thoughts on Paigow, under my name, without her being "present". I don't think any of my comments were anything I never communicated to her and/or were duplicitous,

2. Sometimes I pick on nfh and sometimes I am supportive. Much like with ppnyc I don't necessarily understand what the feeding frenzy on her is. Her posts can be insipid, but everyone posts crap sometimes and her links don't particularly bother me. I did lie when I said I have met her, which lie I think was obvious, but again, it was in part because I think the continued serious shit she got from people was just that. Shit. I have corresponded with her offline and my understanding was that she was a she, and so I didn't have a problem endorsing that. Maybe I naive, but I have since heard from a third party I trust, whom apparently met her, that she is a she,

3. About ppnyc, what she said below. I have never engaged in any games with her on the board. All of you have claimed she is my sock for years. I have told many people offline that this is not true. If you don't like her, don't read her.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Tell her she should get a life so she isn't e-mailing you at midnight.

Thanks. I will try that. Is your firm hiring?

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
:brick:

I was talking about [Thurgreed]. I know you are a she and not a lawyer. Mind like a steel trap, I have.

Maybe in your quest to find a clearly defined and less blury on line persona you could sharpen and tighten up your posts to be more clearly defined and less blurry...eh?

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You mischaracterise me.

1. My "relationship" with Paigow is not what you assert. While I am not above criticsing her, I am also fairly open with her and she knows what is what. There are plenty of places, or at least, where I weighed in on my thoughts on Paigow, under my name, without her being "present". I don't think any of my comments were anything I never communicated to her and/or were duplicitous,

2. Sometimes I pick on nfh and sometimes I am supportive. Much like with ppnyc I don't necessarily understand what the feeding frenzy on her is. Her posts can be insipid, but everyone posts crap sometimes and her links don't particularly bother me. I did lie when I said I have met her, which lie I think was obvious, but again, it was in part because I think the continued serious shit she got from people was just that. Shit. I have corresponded with her offline and my understanding was that she was a she, and so I didn't have a problem endorsing that. Maybe I naive, but I have since heard from a third party I trust, whom apparently met her, that she is a she,

3. About ppnyc, what she said below. I have never engaged in any games with her on the board. All of you have claimed she is my sock for years. I have told many people offline that this is not true. If you don't like her, don't read her.

Many thanks, as always, Penkse.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Not even a litigator, yet he argues in the alternative. And people say deal guys aren't real lawyers.

(P.S. He did not imply, he expressed. )

Expressed or inferred?

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You mischaracterise me.

I have often wondered what your real relationships are with people given the amount of shit you are all too happy to stir up with your "cooperative" antics, which you appear to consider a game, but, as everyone knows all too well at this point, involves a lot of personal animus for some other players. (And I'm not talking only about animus directed toward me; my wonder actually preceded that period.)

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Maybe in your quest to find a clearly defined and less blury on line persona you could sharpen and tighten up your posts to be more clearly defined and less blurry...eh?

Oooh, you little button-pusher you! You really know how to hurt my feelings, blurry as they are.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I have often wondered what your real relationships are with people given the amount of shit you are all too happy to stir up with your "cooperative antics," which you appear to consider a game, but, as everyone knows all too well at this point, involves a lot of personal animus for some other players. (And I'm not talking only about animus directed toward me; my wonder actually preceded that period.)

Maybe, I am able to compartmentalise my relationships.

Other than my "relationship" with Paigow, I am not sure who you are referencing. I recall that I expressed my thoughts on this subject to you. Given that it's impossible for me, from my position, to verify what is she said/she said in some difference with people, I see no reason to take sides. That said, behavior that was out of bounds, in my opinion, I called out. To you and her.

I have no animus to you and don't think I have really participated in any antics towards you, notwithstanding that you and she have a thing. I also, as above, very explicitly told you things that I thought were bullshit about those antics, and communictated the same to her.

My cyberfriendship with Sunny is no different, notwithstanding that the two of them don't get along. I don't get involved, I don't need to, it is none of my business. Why should it be?

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
It ain't over til its over.

What are you talking about? It hasn't even started.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I need local counsel in Chicago. If I choose your shop, would I be able to get any drinks I want for free at the depos?

Yes. But only the A&W Cream Soda. No one likes that crap.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Ironically, coincidentally, I just got an email from the CFO of a relatively large client and she used ELLIPSES!!!!................

I am thinking of responding by cutting and pasting the response above; or in the alternative telling her she is a retarded cunt.

I appreciate y'alls' grammarian skills, which I admit are far greater than mine, so, thoughts?

Aren't ellipses defined as three periods in succession? I don't mind ellipses. I mind multiple ellipses in a row.

ETA: you changed it. Much better. I am officially un-retired.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
What are you talking about? It hasn't even started.

\


Oh. I had a running dream last night......and a sex in a womens' prison dream. Possible relation?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Aren't ellipses defined as three periods in succession? I don't mind ellipses. I mind multiple ellipses in a row.

Not sure. I am a grammatical retard. I wanted 5 sets of ellipseses, less one dot, but I settled for one ellipses.