» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 547 |
0 members and 547 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
01-05-2007, 02:51 PM
|
#2761
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I feel better for saying it was unbelievable.
Kudos to the guy doing the debunking, but isn't it possible that some Park Service types were told to avoid answering questions on the issue and went to PEER, and that the Park Service is now backpeddling?
|
Yes!!!
And for bonus points, like all your other blogger theories, it can't be disproven. Way to go Ty!!!!
You're the one who favors the scientific method, right?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:00 PM
|
#2762
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Yes!!!
And for bonus points, like all your other blogger theories, it can't be disproven. Way to go Ty!!!!
You're the one who favors the scientific method, right?
|
Nuance is just entirely lost on you, isn't it?
PEER has made an allegation. It's not providing any verifiable support. So you certainly can't say it's true. But I don't see where the other guy disproved it, either. When management says a whistleblower is full of it, some skepticism is certainly due, but it's not exactly dispositive, either.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:09 PM
|
#2763
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Nuance is just entirely lost on you, isn't it?
PEER has made an allegation. It's not providing any verifiable support. So you certainly can't say it's true. But I don't see where the other guy disproved it, either. When management says a whistleblower is full of it, some skepticism is certainly due, but it's not exactly dispositive, either.
|
a light lemon fragrence is nuanced, and lovely. But say if someone puts it down in a field full of cow shit, it's hard to detect.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:31 PM
|
#2764
|
Classified
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
How liberal or conservative are you? This quiz is more than a decade old, and some of the questions seem a little odd to me, but whatever.
I got a 14, on a scale of 0 (Jesse Jackson) to 40 (Ronald Reagan).
|
I got a 16, which allegedly puts me between Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, but the questions were so darn vague that its about meaningless. (Trust them how? To do what?)
S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:44 PM
|
#2765
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:44 PM
|
#2766
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In that cafe crowded with fools
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I got a 16, which allegedly puts me between Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, but the questions were so darn vague that its about meaningless. (Trust them how? To do what?)
S_A_M
|
I think if you just go with a gut reaction (what are you people, lawyers or something?! Live a little. :-) ) you'll more or less get to it. I got a 21, sometimes a 22. I also went and fiddled with answers to see if a 40 was even attainable. I could get it up to 39, but it was hard. I have a hard time believing even Ronald Reagan would be so extreme without compromise as what those answers were.
__________________
Why was I born with such contemporaries?
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:45 PM
|
#2767
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In that cafe crowded with fools
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I got a 35.
|
Well, shut my mouth. ![Stick Out Tongue](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
__________________
Why was I born with such contemporaries?
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:45 PM
|
#2768
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I got a 16, which allegedly puts me between Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, but the questions were so darn vague that its about meaningless. (Trust them how? To do what?)
S_A_M
|
31, but I agree that the questions were for shite;
also, I am curious as to the following:
in 1994 in what alternative universe was Bob Dole more conservative than Jack Kemp....?????
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:46 PM
|
#2769
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Quote:
Penske_Account
31, but I agree that the questions were for shite;
also, I am curious as to the following:
in 1994 in what alternative universe was Bob Dole more conservative than Jack Kemp....?????
|
I was thinking the exact same thing, being a Kemp for President chap back in the day.
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:47 PM
|
#2770
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I got a 35.
|
The eyeball licking incident always puts you over the top. Bastard.
Now, shut the fuck up and get back to work!!!!
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:49 PM
|
#2771
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I was thinking the exact same thing, being a Kemp for President chap back in the day.
|
He had the hottest daughters of any candidate in 1988 (keeping in mind that the Gore girls were jailbait back then).
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:50 PM
|
#2772
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I got a 16, which allegedly puts me between Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, but the questions were so darn vague that its about meaningless. (Trust them how? To do what?)
S_A_M
|
19, though I agree that this quiz sucks.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 03:54 PM
|
#2773
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nononono
I think if you just go with a gut reaction (what are you people, lawyers or something?! Live a little. :-) ) you'll more or less get to it. I got a 21, sometimes a 22. I also went and fiddled with answers to see if a 40 was even attainable. I could get it up to 39, but it was hard. I have a hard time believing even Ronald Reagan would be so extreme without compromise as what those answers were.
|
I got a 40.
What you have to remember is true conservatives, and RR, would refuse to answer some of the dumber ones. The only way to get to 40 is to skip about 6 of them.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 04:01 PM
|
#2774
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In that cafe crowded with fools
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I got a 40.
What you have to remember is true conservatives, and RR, would refuse to answer some of the dumber ones. The only way to get to 40 is to skip about 6 of them.
|
You mean the at-least-six that did things like bury assumptions in them as to the merit of both the question and the answer: for example, the one that asked which was the better way to reduce crime, to build more prisons or rebuild inner cities or both, which assumed that "inner cities" all need rebuilding? Surely someone might disagree a tiny bit. Or the one that said to agree or disagree with that the breakdown of the traditional family is THE greatest social crisis in this country, when a perfectly conservative person could think it's a gigantic problem but that it only made the number two spot?
__________________
Why was I born with such contemporaries?
|
|
|
01-05-2007, 04:10 PM
|
#2775
|
the poor-man's spuckler
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nononono
You mean the at-least-six that did things like bury assumptions in them as to the merit of both the question and the answer: for example, the one that asked which was the better way to reduce crime, to build more prisons or rebuild inner cities or both, which assumed that "inner cities" all need rebuilding? Surely someone might disagree a tiny bit. Or the one that said to agree or disagree with that the breakdown of the traditional family is THE greatest social crisis in this country, when a perfectly conservative person could think it's a gigantic problem but that it only made the number two spot?
|
Who knows what Hank means. I got it to produce a 40 only by answering all of them. You must of missed one of the "conservative" points.
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|