A frolic in Cambodia

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Sounds like you just drive the ladies wild.

TM

LL SD

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If you can fuck for a long time, why do anything else?

Dude, I'm a big filet mignon fan, but sometimes a NY strip is what I am in the mood for. Or pork tenderloin. Or a little chicken marsala. Or, if I am feeling especially frisky, a grilled salmon. And, yes, roast beef is also nice.

Variety, my dear sebby, is the spice of life.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I'm going to have to develop a database for GAs that I can and can't go to bed with, cross referencing the PB litmus test, the GA's physical preferences, and preferred/enjoyed sex-acts.

Can we set up some kind of file-sharing arrangement?

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Can we set up some kind of file-sharing arrangement?

Actually, to drive page hits you could just set up a new board for this stuff. I am certain that, like Pavlov's dog, a number of folks would keep checking with the hope that the verdict(s) would change.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Dude, I'm a big filet mignon fan, but sometimes a NY strip is what I am in the mood for. Or pork tenderloin. Or a little chicken marsala. Or, if I am feeling especially frisky, a grilled salmon. And, yes, roast beef is also nice.

Variety, my dear sebby, is the spice of life.

Dude, there are lots of positions...

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Dude, there are lots of positions...

But none of them is the same as a mouth.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Actually, to drive page hits you could just set up a new board for this stuff. I am certain that, like Pavlov's dog, a number of folks would keep checking with the hope that the verdict(s) would change.

I think we'd have to go with some kind of database thingy, not just like a spreadsheet.

I'm visualizing something that tracks preferences, not verdicts. Verdicts is too depressing.

Has anyone noticed that guys who say "Giving oral is fun, because it gets her off, but it's not something I really enjoy" are never EVER even nearly close to as good at it as guys who affirmatively like it? Or is this just a couple bad experiences I've had?

[SlaveNoMore]

Not Bob
Dude, I'm a big filet mignon fan, but sometimes a NY strip is what I am in the mood for. Or pork tenderloin. Or a little chicken marsala. Or, if I am feeling especially frisky, a grilled salmon. And, yes, roast beef is also nice.

Variety, my dear sebby, is the spice of life.

Nice summation of why married men go to strip joints.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Has anyone noticed that guys who say "Giving oral is fun, because it gets her off, but it's not something I really enjoy" are never EVER even nearly close to as good at it as guys who affirmatively like it? Or is this just a couple bad experiences I've had?

Yes, though I think that the guys who affirmatively like it also enjoy the getting me off part. I think all things being equal, they wouldn't enjoy eating pussy as much if I weren't enjoying it too.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I think we'd have to go with some kind of database thingy, not just like a spreadsheet.

I'm visualizing something that tracks preferences, not verdicts. Verdicts is too depressing.

Has anyone noticed that guys who say "Giving oral is fun, because it gets her off, but it's not something I really enjoy" are never EVER even nearly close to as good at it as guys who affirmatively like it? Or is this just a couple bad experiences I've had?

and just like that, we are back to the Chicks Who Aren't That Fond Of Receiving Oral* portion of the conversation. And I've lost Paigow, one of the Chicks who agrees that I am mainly correct on this point.


*comparitively to other stimulations

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
and just like that, we are back to the Chicks Who Aren't That Fond Of Receiving Oral* portion of the conversation. And I've lost Paigow, one of the Chicks who agrees that I am mainly correct on this point.


*comparitively to other stimulations

No, no, you don't have to like it. We were back to the "evil guys who misrepresent their oral skills" portion of the conversation.

eta -- hey, you are the PERFECT woman for Sebby.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I think we'd have to go with some kind of database thingy, not just like a spreadsheet.

No doubt, interactive is better, but why burden RT with extra programming time? Hell, dollars to donuts says Less has a spreadsheet with this stuff on his hard drive right now.

I'm visualizing something that tracks preferences, not verdicts. Verdicts is too depressing.

Yes, but if you want to drive the traffic, you gotta get to the good part.

Sure, it's amusing trivia to learn that Sebby likes to fuck while swinging from a trapese, but what the masses really want to know is where they fall in the Not Ever/Well, Maybe if I'm Drunk/OK, Perhaps/Sure, Why Not/Probably/Definitely/Hell Yes! spectrum.

(I'm also imagining that this ranking is probably entered only by the FBetties. After all, if the rankings are "yes" for all candidates*, where's the suspense?)









* Hypothetically speaking, of course.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
and just like that, we are back to the Chicks Who Aren't That Fond Of Receiving Oral* portion of the conversation. And I've lost Paigow, one of the Chicks who agrees that I am mainly correct on this point.


*comparitively to other stimulations

See! This is why the database would be useful. Pair those chicks up with the will-give-oral-lip-service-but-not-really-into-it guys.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Gattigap
No doubt, interactive is better, but why burden RT with extra programming time? Hell, dollars to donuts says Less has a spreadsheet with this stuff on his hard drive right now.



Yes, but if you want to drive the traffic, you gotta get to the good part.

Sure, it's amusing trivia to learn that Sebby likes to fuck while swinging from a trapese, but what the masses really want to know is where they fall in the Not Ever/Well, Maybe if I'm Drunk/OK, Perhaps/Sure, Why Not/Probably/Definitely/Hell Yes! spectrum.

(I'm also imagining that this ranking is probably entered only by the FBetties. After all, if the rankings are "yes" for all candidates*, where's the suspense?)









* Hypothetically speaking, of course.

I don't think Less will have the kind of info I want.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
See! This is why the database would be useful. Pair those chicks up with the will-give-oral-lip-service-but-not-really-into-it guys.

Jinx! 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-you-owe-me-a-coke