A frolic in Cambodia

[Jack Manfred]

Sorry I wasn't able to post a response to the sex thread earlier in the day. I had to catch up at work after spending the better part of the weekend... being affirmative.

And the reason why it's difficult to film sex scenes involving cunnilingus is that if you're doing it right, the giver is busy with the parts of the receiver that the director wants to film the most. The compromise is to show "porno tongue" where the tip of the tongue plays too prominent a role in the performance. The giver needs surface area and motor control which doesn't generally make for an interesting frame.

But the fact that cunnilingus doesn't lend itself to filming doesn't mean it isn't a worthwhile endeavor. After all, filming the act of writing has always been troublesome to directors, but there are still authors.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Sebby would work out, no question. I'm betting he'd talk too much afterwards though.......

I'm more of a get up and run into the other room and watch television kind of guy.

But with you, I might cuddle.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Mrs. Palsgraf's Revenge.

• A piece of grilled shrimp flung playfully by a Japanese hibachi chef toward a tableside diner is being blamed for causing the man's death.
  
  Making a proximate-cause argument, the lawyer for the deceased man's estate has alleged that the man's reflexive response -- to duck away from the flying food -- caused a neck injury that required surgery.
  
  Complications from that first operation necessitated a second procedure. Five months later, Jerry Colaitis of Old Brookville, N.Y., was dead of an illness that his family claims was proximately caused by the injury.

It's time for us to retire the word "proximate" from the phrase "proximate cause." It obviously isn't doing us lawyers any damn good.

I never understood what it meant anyway. I just said it because it sounded cooler and its waritten that way in the book.

[Hank Chinaski]

So I started reading this long thing about how different newspapers report on differences between the sexes based upon political leanings....

Science Reporting Skews Sex Differences
Run Date: 11/17/04
By Sheila Gibbons
WeNews commentator
Science reporting on sex differences comes out differently in conservative and liberal newspapers. So depending on which you read, gender stereotypes may be getting confirmed or challenged.

blah, blah blah....

http://www.womensenews.com/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2071

It's long and boring, but I was thinking about differences and yesterday's thread. The oral posts started because someone said she gave the occasional BJ w/o anything coming to her. Then some guys started talking about how they like to do oral because they get harder. No guy talked about doing oral and then getting up and going on with life- we have a goal in mind when we do it.

I'm not sure why the difference exists, I'm not unhappy about it, but I just realized it.

Are women naturally more giving, or is it societal training?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Then some guys started talking about how they like to do oral because they get harder.

Whats with this "harder" thing? In my experience, generally, its always going to reach the same level of hardness at some point. Its not like "but for" performing oral sex on a chick, you wouldn't get as hard as you could be.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Whats with this "harder" thing? In my experience, generally, its always going to reach the same level of hardness at some point. Its not like "but for" performing oral sex on a chick, you wouldn't get as hard as you could be.

Are you kidding? There are degrees of excitement. If I have plain, vanilla sex over and over, I will get hard, but not nearly as hard as if I'm watching two hot women go at it -- just waiting for my turn to jump in.

TM

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Whats with this "harder" thing? In my experience, generally, its always going to reach the same level of hardness at some point. Its not like "but for" performing oral sex on a chick, you wouldn't get as hard as you could be.

Although I admire you for not falling all over yourself like the rest of the pathetic, pussy-whipped losers on this board, declaring their undying love for cunnilingis in a laughable attempt to curry favor with the female contributors, I think you are not being straight with us here. Surely, a man with your penchant for whiskey has experienced the occasional alcohol-related softening of the love organ. For some of us, nothing but a healthy serving of writhing, moaning, quivering roast beef au jus will get us back to maximum hardness. And, believe me, you need maximum hardness when you try to sneak in through the back door.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
So I started reading this long thing about how different newspapers report on differences between the sexes based upon political leanings....


http://www.womensenews.com/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2071

It's long and boring, but I was thinking about differences and yesterday's thread. The oral posts started because someone said she gave the occasional BJ w/o anything coming to her. Then some guys started talking about how they like to do oral because they get harder. No guy talked about doing oral and then getting up and going on with life- we have a goal in mind when we do it.

I'm not sure why the difference exists, I'm not unhappy about it, but I just realized it.

Are women naturally more giving, or is it societal training?

ARGH. It gets me off, ok. I'm not a giving person.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Although I admire you for not falling all over yourself like the rest of the pathetic, pussy-whipped losers on this board, declaring their undying love for cunnilingis in a laughable attempt to curry favor with the female contributors, I think you are not being straight with us here. Surely, a man with your penchant for whiskey has experienced the occasional alcohol-related softening of the love organ. For some of us, nothing but a healthy serving of writhing, moaning, quivering roast beef au jus will get us back to maximum hardness. And, believe me, you need maximum hardness when you try to sneak in through the back door.

I am immune to whiskey dick. I have the usual trouble coming in that state, but hardness isn't an issue. Lucky circulatory genes I guess...

I also tend to get most excited on the morning after a long battle with the bottle(s). Hung over sex is way more intense. Still haven;t figured that one out completely... guessing it has something to do with blood rushing to the surface everywhere in your body.

Agreed on the back door bit. But if that gig's on the table, excitement probably isn't lacking in any regard...

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Are you kidding? There are degrees of excitement. If I have plain, vanilla sex over and over, I will get hard, but not nearly as hard as if I'm watching two hot women go at it -- just waiting for my turn to jump in.

TM

Well, if you raise that hypothetical...

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Whats with this "harder" thing? In my experience, generally, its always going to reach the same level of hardness at some point. Its not like "but for" performing oral sex on a chick, you wouldn't get as hard as you could be.

Well there is a certain softening during the act, perhaps because there is no need for hardness until its done. As the woman's orgasm approaches, one knows its gametime, and becomes harder*. Although T. is right that there are degrees of hard anyway (at least after 16).

*and no Fringe that doesn't mean we're just punching the clock-the 5 PM bell sounds good even at a job you love.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'm not that charming...

My world has just been turned upside down.

[ilikenewsocks]

Indiana Pacers forward Ron Artest said Tuesday he wishes he hadn't gotten into a fight with fans but feels his season-ending suspension was too harsh.

"I don't think it was fair -- that many games," Artest said in an interview with NBC's "Today" show. "I respect (NBA Commissioner) David Stern's decisions, but I don't think I should have been out for the whole season."

link

[ilikenewsocks]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
ARGH. It gets me off, ok. I'm not a giving person.

I would ask if you were a receiving person, but since that would get me in trouble with PLF, never mind.

Sincerely,
ArbysFan

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Well, if you raise that hypothetical...

Hypothetical?