» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 679 |
0 members and 679 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
01-23-2004, 12:16 PM
|
#3016
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Flower
Posts: 8,434
|
Penske Time Machine
Quote:
Originally posted by purse junkie
This is why most guys seem to have no knowledge whatsoever about the lives of people they've known for like 20 years. I'm constantly amazed, for example, about how little guys know about their own SOs--they couldn't answer one of the basic "whoopie" questions on the fucking Newlywed Game, when after 2 dinner parties I already know the SO's life story and that she's planning to leave Clueless Blockhead for another guy.
|
I bet you also know the birth weights of all of your friends' children and their first through sixth choices for baby names.
That's nice.
__________________
Inside every man lives the seed of a flower.
If he looks within he finds beauty and power.
I am not sorry.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:20 PM
|
#3017
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Penske Time Machine
Quote:
Originally posted by purse junkie
This is why most guys seem to have no knowledge whatsoever about the lives of people they've known for like 20 years. I'm constantly amazed, for example, about how little guys know about their own SOs--they couldn't answer one of the basic "whoopie" questions on the fucking Newlywed Game, when after 2 dinner parties I already know the SO's life story and that she's planning to leave Clueless Blockhead for another guy.
|
No, I have no problems dealing with a friend going through a divorce or something serious like that. My ire is reserved for those cloying imbeciles who need reinforcement for every single thing they do in a relationship. I've fucked up lots of shit in my life, but my personal relationships is not one of them. I frankly don't know how you can fuck up personal relationships if you communicate properly. Most of these annoying fuckers who need reinforcement are into game playing. They don't come right out and say what they mean to the people with whom they're involved. You can't hide the ball or hedge or play games and expect to have a meaningful relationship with anyone.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:22 PM
|
#3018
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,278
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
That is sort of my point. Like why the lofty NYT needs to stoop to the level of a People or an Entertainment Weekly.
|
Oh hell, they probably did the same thing citing Ah-nold and Stallone when Vin Diesel came onto the scene in Pitch Black. Or the Rock in The Runaway.
There are actors that generally fill in certain archetypal characters in Hollywood, and we, the movie going audience, generally expect that there will be some cute early twenty something type (usually American, but not always) to star in a series of romantic comedies and thrillers. These actresses generally do the same type of role for a few years and then do their "serious" role and move on beyond the innocent but resilient girl who gets a few hard knocks but is triumphent in the end (unless she dies tragically). Reece Witherspoon doesn't really fit the model, because most of her early work has been making fun of that archetype (see Freeway, Election, Pleasantville, American Psycho and Legally Blonde.) Julia Ormond tried for a few years ( Legends of the Fall, First Knight, and Sabrina), but she wasn't really good. Kate Beckensale also tried ( Much Ado About Nothing, Brokedown Palace) but she deviated from the path and tried to come back to the role when she was too old ( Pearl Harbor, Serendipity). Drew Barrymore's personal, er, history prevented her from ever getting that role, though she tried in Never Been Kissed. Renee Zelwigger probably had the title for awhile, especially after Jerry Maguire. Kirsten Dunst probably is a hell of a lot closer than anyone else at this point to filling that role (and she was born in 1982, so she's got some years to hold the title if she wants it), though since she's been acting for so long, she may want to do something else. Thora Birch, Christina Ricci, Claire Danes, Natalie Portman, Winona Ryder, and a variety of others didn't make the cut because they did too many dark and off beat characters. Katie Holmes, Selma Blair, the American Pie cast, all of them are too no-name or too low-brow and don't have the star qualities. Gwyneth didn't make the cut because she's never really exuded cute.
I don't know if this particular person is going to fill the archetype, but it's probably either her or Mandy Moore.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#3019
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Oh hell, they probably did the same thing citing Ah-nold and Stallone when Vin Diesel came onto the scene in Pitch Black. Or the Rock in The Runaway.
There are actors that generally fill in certain archetypal characters in Hollywood, and we, the movie going audience, generally expect that there will be some cute early twenty something type (usually American, but not always) to star in a series of romantic comedies and thrillers. These actresses generally do the same type of role for a few years and then do their "serious" role and move on beyond the innocent but resilient girl who gets a few hard knocks but is triumphent in the end (unless she dies tragically). Reece Witherspoon doesn't really fit the model, because most of her early work has been making fun of that archetype (see Freeway, Election, Pleasantville, American Psycho and Legally Blonde.) Julia Ormond tried for a few years (Legends of the Fall, First Knight, and Sabrina), but she wasn't really good. Kate Beckensale also tried (Much Ado About Nothing, Brokedown Palace) but she deviated from the path and tried to come back to the role when she was too old (Pearl Harbor, Serendipity). Drew Barrymore's personal, er, history prevented her from ever getting that role, though she tried in Never Been Kissed. Renee Zelwigger probably had the title for awhile, especially after Jerry Maguire. Kirsten Dunst probably is a hell of a lot closer than anyone else at this point to filling that role (and she was born in 1982, so she's got some years to hold the title if she wants it), though since she's been acting for so long, she may want to do something else. Thora Birch, Christina Ricci, Claire Danes, Natalie Portman, Winona Ryder, and a variety of others didn't make the cut because they did too many dark and off beat characters. Katie Holmes, Selma Blair, the American Pie cast, all of them are too no-name or too low-brow and don't have the star qualities.
I don't know if this particular person is going to fill the archetype, but it's probably either her or Maggie Moore.
|
Let's just have it be Scarlett Johanssen
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#3020
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Oh hell, they probably did the same thing citing Ah-nold and Stallone when Vin Diesel came onto the scene in Pitch Black. Or the Rock in The Runaway.
There are actors that generally fill in certain archetypal characters in Hollywood, and we, the movie going audience, generally expect that there will be some cute early twenty something type (usually American, but not always) to star in a series of romantic comedies and thrillers. These actresses generally do the same type of role for a few years and then do their "serious" role and move on beyond the innocent but resilient girl who gets a few hard knocks but is triumphent in the end (unless she dies tragically). Reece Witherspoon doesn't really fit the model, because most of her early work has been making fun of that archetype (see Freeway, Election, Pleasantville, American Psycho and Legally Blonde.) Julia Ormond tried for a few years (Legends of the Fall, First Knight, and Sabrina), but she wasn't really good. Kate Beckensale also tried (Much Ado About Nothing, Brokedown Palace) but she deviated from the path and tried to come back to the role when she was too old (Pearl Harbor, Serendipity). Drew Barrymore's personal, er, history prevented her from ever getting that role, though she tried in Never Been Kissed. Renee Zelwigger probably had the title for awhile, especially after Jerry Maguire. Kirsten Dunst probably is a hell of a lot closer than anyone else at this point to filling that role (and she was born in 1982, so she's got some years to hold the title if she wants it), though since she's been acting for so long, she may want to do something else. Thora Birch, Christina Ricci, Claire Danes, Natalie Portman, Winona Ryder, and a variety of others didn't make the cut because they did too many dark and off beat characters. Katie Holmes, Selma Blair, the American Pie cast, all of them are too no-name or too low-brow and don't have the star qualities.
I don't know if this particular person is going to fill the archetype, but it's probably either her or Maggie Moore.
|
I don't care if its Ernest Borgnine in a dress, just get rid of Julia Roberts.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#3021
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I don't know if this particular person is going to fill the archetype, but it's probably either her or Maggie Moore.
|
You have not convinced me that you are reading People and Us Weekly.
I stand by my choice of me for entertainment trivia.
Mandy Moore
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#3022
|
Fast left eighty slippy
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,236
|
Penske Time Machine
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I always thought she was cute but she dated a cat I knew pretty well for the last two years of school, so I never got a chance.
|
Zipper cat or bottle cat?
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#3023
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I recognize my grammar left the point vague, but I'm hurt that you'd think I would laud Patch Adams.
Like a knife in my heart.
|
All I can say is, "WHEW!"
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#3024
|
Guest
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Oh hell, they probably did the same thing citing Ah-nold and Stallone when Vin Diesel came onto the scene in Pitch Black. Or the Rock in The Runaway.
There are actors that generally fill in certain archetypal characters in Hollywood, and we, the movie going audience, generally expect that there will be some cute early twenty something type (usually American, but not always) to star in a series of romantic comedies and thrillers. These actresses generally do the same type of role for a few years and then do their "serious" role and move on beyond the innocent but resilient girl who gets a few hard knocks but is triumphent in the end (unless she dies tragically). Reece Witherspoon doesn't really fit the model, because most of her early work has been making fun of that archetype (see Freeway, Election, Pleasantville, American Psycho and Legally Blonde.) Julia Ormond tried for a few years (Legends of the Fall, First Knight, and Sabrina), but she wasn't really good. Kate Beckensale also tried (Much Ado About Nothing, Brokedown Palace) but she deviated from the path and tried to come back to the role when she was too old (Pearl Harbor, Serendipity). Drew Barrymore's personal, er, history prevented her from ever getting that role, though she tried in Never Been Kissed. Renee Zelwigger probably had the title for awhile, especially after Jerry Maguire. Kirsten Dunst probably is a hell of a lot closer than anyone else at this point to filling that role (and she was born in 1982, so she's got some years to hold the title if she wants it), though since she's been acting for so long, she may want to do something else. Thora Birch, Christina Ricci, Claire Danes, Natalie Portman, Winona Ryder, and a variety of others didn't make the cut because they did too many dark and off beat characters. Katie Holmes, Selma Blair, the American Pie cast, all of them are too no-name or too low-brow and don't have the star qualities.
I don't know if this particular person is going to fill the archetype, but it's probably either her or Maggie Moore.
|
Maggie Moore, as in the girflriend of Amos Roddick?
I think Kate Hudson has the americas sweetheart crown at the moment in terms of who makes the most money. Actually, I though reese had it until legally blonde 2 (bc it sucked, not that I saw it, not bc she was too old). but kate is like 25 now I think so she probably is too old for it as well. it was a short run, huh? how to lose a guy in ten days.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:30 PM
|
#3025
|
Too Good For Post Numbers
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
I think Kate Hudson has the americas sweetheart crown at the moment . . .
|
My daughter assures me that it's Hillary Duff.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#3026
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Maggie Moore, as in the girflriend of Amos Roddick?
|
this made me lol.
Note to Bilmore's kid: Hillary Duff is too cheezy to be America's sweetheart. Not going to happen.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:35 PM
|
#3027
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,278
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Maggie Moore, as in the girflriend of Amos Roddick?
I think Kate Hudson has the americas sweetheart crown at the moment in terms of who makes the most money. Actually, I though reese had it until legally blonde 2 (bc it sucked, not that I saw it, not bc she was too old). but kate is like 25 now I think so she probably is too old for it as well. it was a short run, huh? how to lose a guy in ten days.
|
Mandy Moore, who probably will never be taken seriously by the movie-goers because she's a pop queen too. She's in some movie that's out right now that I have no interest in seeing.
Kate Hudson isn't a bad choice either.
Oh, Sandra Bullock tried too, but she's never going to be an A-list actor, and she got into the game pretty late.
Scarlett Johansen does the off-beat stuff, and she's not "cute" enough. (I'd much rather watch someone like her than these vapid cutsies, but I'm talking about both the archetype and the person who can command the box office. She doesn't fit into either role, and to her credit, I dont' think she wants to.)
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:37 PM
|
#3028
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Maggie Moore, as in the girflriend of Amos Roddick?
I think Kate Hudson has the americas sweetheart crown at the moment in terms of who makes the most money. Actually, I though reese had it until legally blonde 2 (bc it sucked, not that I saw it, not bc she was too old). but kate is like 25 now I think so she probably is too old for it as well. it was a short run, huh? how to lose a guy in ten days.
|
How long before Kate divorces that cat from the Black Crowes who lookes like Mr. Burns with bad pre-puescent facial hair?
I give it another two years.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:39 PM
|
#3029
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Mandy Moore, who probably will never be taken seriously by the movie-goers because she's a pop queen too. She's in some movie that's out right now that I have no interest in seeing.
Kate Hudson isn't a bad choice either.
Oh, Sandra Bullock tried too, but she's never going to be an A-list actor, and she got into the game pretty late.
Scarlett Johansen does the off-beat stuff, and she's not "cute" enough. (I'd much rather watch someone like her than these vapid cutsies, but I'm talking about both the archetype and the person who can command the box office. She doesn't fit into either role, and to her credit, I dont' think she wants to.)
|
Sandra Bullock is about as sexual as Dan Rather. She could be a trannie.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2004, 12:42 PM
|
#3030
|
Rageaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
|
Maybe coltrane was right?
Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
this made me lol.
Note to Bilmore's kid: Hillary Duff is too cheezy to be America's sweetheart. Not going to happen.
|
I don't know exactly who it is. Hillary Duff is pretty popular among the kiddies, but maybe that's the problem, just like I can't see either of the Olsen Twins making the jump (sorry, Coltrane). If I were to guess, I'd say someone (who started in) television will make the jump.
Amanda Bynes, maybe? Come to think of it, she may suffer from the same problem as H.D., but at least she's smart enough not to sing.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|