Removing the feeding tube from our aging hipster plaid pants

[bilmore]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Quickly closing all internet browser windows whenever the person walks by the door?

You're reading bad things into an innocuous situation. He's probably just into kiddie porn.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
It's weird, all the words are in English, yet I still can't translate this. Fucking public schools.

2.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by bilmore
You're reading bad things into an innocuous situation. He's probably just into kiddie porn.

That's what I'd worry about in the FBA's situation. Sometimes not having the whole story, even with incrimidating evidence, can make you (read: me) jump to the wrong conclusions.

Originally posted by ltl/fb
2.

The beauty of that post is that it reads like its being spoken by someone who is currently shitting on some Atti bed. Which underscores the whole point of the message. I bet Ollieor PLF followed it just fine.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
It's weird, all the words are in English, yet I still can't translate this. Fucking public schools.

FWIW, private school has failed me.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
When you snoop, you will either discover nothing, or discover something you really don't want to know. If it's the latter, the temptation to say "how could you x and y and z and say this and that and the other" is inevitable, but should be avoided, because the snooper has violated the other's privacy, regardless of what the snoopee had violated.

So, I can't speak to b 'n b's meaning, but I would say that you can't use it in the sense of throwing every painful detail you discovered while snooping in the other person's face. Of course, I think you can use the fact of what you discovered while snooping if the person denies what you know to be true. That is, "I know you're seeing someone because," but not, "how could you have told him ___."

Threads like this are interesting because they reveal the women who have cheated on their SOs but would insist that they are morally superior because, after all, at least they respected their SOs privacy.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Threads like this are interesting because they reveal the women who have cheated on their SOs but would insist that they are morally superior because, after all, at least they respected their SOs privacy.

Uh, I don't see this. Which cheating women have been unmasked?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
It's fruit of the poisonous tree. It's off limits.

So if snooping indicates a problem and you follow your SO to a public location and see him making out with his hussy bitch, you can't confront him on it?

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
That's what I'd worry about in the FBA's situation. Sometimes not having the whole story, even with incrimidating evidence, can make you (read: me) jump to the wrong conclusions.

Better copyright that, RT. It's only a matter of time before Fox launches Incrimidate!* in its 10:30 timeslot. Especially with Gatti reading these boards.



*A dating show where desperate women compete for dates with soon-to-be-released inmates.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Threads like this are interesting because they reveal the women who have cheated on their SOs but would insist that they are morally superior because, after all, at least they respected their SOs privacy.

Who around here ever insists on their moral superiority, other than you?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Uh, I don't see this. Which cheating women have been unmasked?

It's a joke. If you don't get it, move on. Another one is never far behind.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Who around here ever insists on their moral superiority, other than you?

I don't insist on anything.

I may occasionally recognize the obvious, but what's wrong with that?

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
So if snooping indicates a problem and you follow your SO to a public location and see him making out with his hussy bitch, you can't confront him on it?

Sounds like a very frustrating episode of Law and Order.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
So if snooping indicates a problem and you follow your SO to a public location and see him making out with his hussy bitch, you can't confront him on it?

Nope. If you see Mrs. Finch making out with some guy in a public location, you are completely within your rights to walk up to her, shake her like a rag doll, and bellow "What in tarnation is going on here?"

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Who around here ever insists on their moral superiority, other than you?

Ahem.