LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 430
0 members and 430 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2004, 02:50 AM   #3196
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Changing of the Guard

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
First Bob Bartley died, and now this

Jesus wept.

We wish him well in this divestiture. Again, I apologize for the long cut and paste from Icke's website, where I'm sure you will find lots of informative information. Slave, I'll buy you a new cock ring or something. Excerpt from article outing Sir Laurance Gardner (not sure if that's our Gardner or one of his socks) as a "shape-shifter who takes part in human sacrifice rituals":



According to Arizona Wilder and now Stewart Swerdlow, however, Sir Laurence Gardner has other duties also. Here I am going to outline in Swerdlow's own words what he says his experiences have been of Sir Laurence, and indeed William F. Buckley Jr., the head of the elite Janus mind control operation based at NATO headquarters in Belgium:

Stewart Swerdlow told me:

" When I was at Montauk between 1970 and 1983, I started out there at a very low level. I was not supposed to survive. It was only later when they saw that I was living when I shouldn't have been that they told me that less than one per cent of the experimented children survived. And of that one per cent very few made it into society.

Not that I claim to function well in society, because I really don't, but, however, I am doing better than other people are as far as survivors are concerned.

And you should understand that the ceremonies that were conducted at Montauk were very occasional. In other words they would occur at certain times of the year. And they would bring in people that were not usually there, one of whom was William F. Buckley, and one of the other ones was someone who I didn't know his name. We didn't know the names, usually.

It wasn't until years later that I saw a picture of Gardner and I realised it was him. It was quite a shock to me that here was this man who performed heinous ceremonies with me and there he was on this video I was watching, which, by the way, was made by Duncan Roads (a Nexus video). This was quite a shock to me. He was promoting as the truth the bloodline of the Holy Grail and the Jesus connection and all that stuff which is all diversion. All religion is artificial.

In the ceremony they would have sacrifices and during the bloodletting, especially if there were infants involved, these beings would change into a reptilian form. And the interesting thing about it is that there would be this yellow-green slime residue after the ceremonies. It would be on my body and on the altars and on the flooring. I have also since found it on my children as well, which is disturbing to me.

During the ceremony Gardner would be the one that would actually take over from the Mother Goddess. There was also a male counterpart to the Mother Goddess and he (Gardner) would actually take a blade from the male figure and he would plunge it into the infants body. And then he would, having shifted into reptilian form, he would devour the intestinal body of the infant.

To be quite honest I hate remembering these things. They are very disturbing to me. To this day I can't be around blood or anything reptilian. The blood sacrifice is very, very, disturbing to me.

My memory of that person (Gardner) started in about 1973 and went to 1980. It happened about three times a year that I would see him at the Montauk rituals. His face was the same, but his hair was darker and he was a bit thinner than he looks now.

I remember his face and the attitude...he has very powerful eyes and that is what I would focus on during the ceremony, was the eyes. And that is how some of the energy was transferred between us and them.

(When Stewart Swerdlow wrote about this, without naming names, in his autobiography, he was threatened, he says, and so were his children. He was jailed at one stage, also, by the government.)

Gardner would come in with a lot of pomp and ceremony. He would wear a kind of purple-violet robe and was naked underneath it. And then soon as he would shape-shift, the robe would come off and they placed a gold crown on his head. And the crown had what looked like an amber and a ruby, alternate stones all the way around.

William F. Buckley Jr. (the American publisher who heads the elite Janus mind control project at NATO headquarters) was the most awful of all of them. Quite honestly he used his teeth a lot. He used to bite a lot. He got pleasure out of hurting people by biting them after he shape-shifted. To this very day I have an aversion to that kind of thing.

In his shape-shifted form, Gardner was like a whitish-grey colour and had a very pointed back of his head. His eyes were kind of elongated, but not so reptilian, it was almost like they were a cross between human and reptilian. But dark, like a dark, golden brown. And he was not very tall, he was only about six-foot when he shifted.

Buckley was taller, he was around seven feet when he shifted, and he had a split in his crown, in other words it looked like horns instead of the top of his head. And he was rounder, more of a greenish white colour.

You see we were indoctrinated a lot at Montauk. We were told that there were seven levels of the reptilian race and the heirarchy of them were very similar to the Hindu caste system. So there were accordingly different shapes that occurred. The lower levels never really shifted, they were the little worker drones, if you want to call it that. The top of the line, the Brahmin-type, were very tall and winged (the Draco I talk about in the Biggest Secret and Credo Mutwa describes in The Reptilian Agenda videos).
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."

Last edited by Shape Shifter; 06-29-2004 at 03:07 AM..
Shape Shifter is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 09:51 AM   #3197
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The important thing is that Hank is out there giving 110% every time.
Quote:
Originally posted by SS
The Bridge of Love story of 9/11 tracks Moore's
It doesn't scare you guys the Ickes and your media darling are on the same page? The only difference is how to solve the problem. Ickes doesn't offer any solutions beyond dying your hair if your Aryan. I would like to see soemone investigate the BOL/MM ties. Was the book Ickes sent MM's initial piece of evidence?

Do you guys have no intellectual shame?

commercials? When i look out my window I see a sign, actually a couple that say "Regime Change Begins at Home." I take that to mean Bush is the equivalent of Sadaam and our troops are the Republican Guard. I will see F. 9/11 someday, probably do the theatre switch, but I will see it. As understood, it will claims Bush started a war where 10's of thousands of people will be killed so that a company some friends own can make some money. That is a pretty horific charge. The MoveOn commercial? Well it was apparently pulled, after the uproar, but that is different than the commercial being seen as to extreme to be made.

Are the Dems raving lunatics with no solution?
Is the Bush piece fair?
Is the MM movie fair?
Are the Regime Change signs fair?
Is Bush allowed to respond at all?
Quote:
Originally posted by SS
Are either running for president?
This just makes the commercial more fair doesn't it? MM/Geppie/Gore say Bush is basically the angel of darkness and he has no medium to respond. I mean really, is the Bush commercial anything more than a "sock check" on some new poster who posts a screed?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 06-29-2004 at 09:56 AM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 10:13 AM   #3198
andViolins
(Moderator) oHIo
 
andViolins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
Question:

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
I note (before this turns hostile), that my whole quote about "arguing about terminology" specifically covers your retort. You are arguing the similarity of the rights to those of a union, and I'm merely noting that, at the very least, their organization just can't be called a union. For whatever reason.

Hello

ETA: The national FOP site indicates that it was merely avoiding the shame of being a union when formed in 1915. It does not substantively address things like the MASS 1958 exception (which, strangely, I only found for MASS on the internet... weird that). Anyway, aside from the no-strike thing, one of the rather major differences from many traditional unions is the organizational structure. The national is more like a professional organization that does lobbying, political endorsements etc. It does not govern locals. For example, it doesn't take over locals when the leadership has gone bad. Similar to the state/local level. I suspect its related to the union thing in that local govts want to bargain with their sweethearts and not some guy in another state. But there is surprisingly little to be found either for or against my proposition on the internet.
I'm not trying to be hostile. I guess I'm not sure where you are basing this argument about terminology. Granted, I do not practice in Mass. But a quick look at the Boston Police Patrolmen's Association website shows that it is Local #1607 of IUPA, AFL-CIO.

see www.bppa.org

Going over to the IUPA website shows that on February 20,1979 - IUPA becomes the first independent law enforcement union to hold an AFL-CIO charter.

http://www.iupa.org/about/iupahighlights.html

So, while we certainly agree that the Boston police can't strike (but can have an informational picket), I'm not sure you are correct in saying that they can't officially be called a union, because it looks like they are calling themselves a union. While the FOP may represent other police officers in the state, it does not appear that they represent the men and women in blue in Beantown.

As to the organizational structure between the BPPA and the IUPA national, I have no idea. We'd have to get a copy of the International's Constitution to see what rights they have with respect to each local.

aV
andViolins is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 10:55 AM   #3199
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
Question:

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
I guess I'm not sure where you are basing this argument about terminology

aV
The Haymarket riots is my understanding of the origin. Whether its the police or the local governments, someone at least didn't want them to be called a "union".

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
see www.bppa.org

aV
I concede your point, with surprise. It looks like things have changed quicker in some places than others. And it certainly mootifies that 1958 blurb from the state website.

In other news, the Boston Globe today reports that they promised not to picket the convention. Which is a good move, given the spot Kerry backed himself into otherwise, unless yesterday was staged between the two from the beginning.
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 11:42 AM   #3200
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Is Bush allowed to respond at all?
Frankly, the commercial would have been just as effective without the Hitler cut - he was the least offensive of the speakers.
sgtclub is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:00 PM   #3201
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
More WMD Found

Quote:
In a little-noticed but highly significant interview aired Thursday evening by Fox News Channel, the chief American weapons inspector in Iraq, Charles Duelfer, said, “We found, you know, 10 or 12 sarin and mustard rounds.”

http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/ge.../28&ID=Ar01002
sgtclub is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:34 PM   #3202
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
(1) Are the Dems raving lunatics with no solution?
(2) Is the Bush piece fair?
(3) Is the MM movie fair?
(4) Are the Regime Change signs fair?
(5) Is Bush allowed to respond at all?
(1) No more so than their counterparts across the aisle. Drug companies are coming up with wonderful medications these days, so there is hope.

(2) No.

(3) Probably not.

(4) Yes.

(5) Yes.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:39 PM   #3203
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Frankly, the commercial would have been just as effective without the Hitler cut - he was the least offensive of the speakers.
Niiiiiiiiiice. Another tick mark in the "Would have been funny if Slave had posted it" column.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:56 PM   #3204
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Niiiiiiiiiice. Another tick mark in the "Would have been funny if Slave had posted it" column.
Not sure why you are so obsessed with me, but it's flattering nonetheless.
sgtclub is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:58 PM   #3205
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
(1) No more so than their counterparts across the aisle. Drug companies are coming up with wonderful medications these days, so there is hope.

(2) No.

(3) Probably not.

(4) Yes.

(5) Yes.
sorry Ty. 2 and 4 must have the same answer or you're misguided.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 01:58 PM   #3206
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Not sure why you are so obsessed with me, but it's flattering nonetheless.
Nice ego, but it's Hitler I'm obsessed with. Duh.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 02:04 PM   #3207
Did you just call me Coltrane?
Registered User
 
Did you just call me Coltrane?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
sorry Ty. 2 and 4 must have the same answer or you're misguided.
Why?

re·gime also ré·gime ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-zhm, r-)
n.

(1) A form of government
(2) A government in power; administration: A prevailing social system or pattern.
(3) The period during which a particular administration or system prevails.
(4) A regulated system, as of diet and exercise; a regimen.

All "regime change" means is a change in the government in power. Every non-incumbent wants regime change.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
Did you just call me Coltrane? is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 02:12 PM   #3208
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
sorry Ty. 2 and 4 must have the same answer or you're misguided.
One of my neighbors has a "Regime Change Begins At Home." I talk to the fellow about politics from time to time, when we're picking up the weekly local newspaper that arrives whether we ask for it or not, or when my dog is crapping on his lawn, or when his kids are chasing my cat with water guns. In all that time, he's never said anything that suggested to me that he thinks Bush is on a par with Saddam Hussein. And the fellow has some strong views -- you should hear him talk about the increased funding for the local mosquito abatement district! So I always thought the sign meant that while we're changing regimes in Iraq, we might as well change ours here, too. You know -- a way of saying, dump Bush, in what passes for clever on political signage.

Which is to say you need a new answer key for these quizes.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 02:14 PM   #3209
Sexual Harassment Panda
Don't touch there
 
Sexual Harassment Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Why?

re·gime also ré·gime ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-zhm, r-)
n.

(1) A form of government
(2) A government in power; administration: A prevailing social system or pattern.
(3) The period during which a particular administration or system prevails.
(4) A regulated system, as of diet and exercise; a regimen.

All "regime change" means is a change in the government in power. Every non-incumbent wants regime change.
Tread lightly here. Quasi-judicial agents empowered by the under Sec. of Commerce to reach decisions don't like it when you quote dictionary definitions to them - they think you're being condescending.
Sexual Harassment Panda is offline  
Old 06-29-2004, 02:18 PM   #3210
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
new signs of desperation from the re-election folks

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
sorry Ty. 2 and 4 must have the same answer or you're misguided.
Drop it, Chinaski. You're in danger of this becoming a new topic with a high probability of you going to 41-8.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM.