A disgusting vat of filth that no self-respecting intelligent person would wade into.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And the title of the post? Another typo?

I believe Ty named the re line first.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Nothing below since Reno moved back to Florida.......

Let's call Hillary a lesbian -- that's the way to insult her, because we all know lesbians are evil.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Let's call Hillary a lesbian -- that's the way to insult her, because we all know lesbians are evil.

at least they shouldn't have a voice in sending troops to war. Did you vote for Boxer?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I believe Ty named the re line first.

um, no.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And the title of the post? Another typo?

did you read my public apology for the words or the beat?

[nononono]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Let's call Hillary a lesbian -- that's the way to insult her, because we all know lesbians are evil.

I think you're missing a distinction here. I believe it is only lesbians who make it with ugly women who are evil. Hot lesbian lovers are appreciated by both sides of the aisle*.


*Barbara Boxer excepted, maybe.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Let's call Hillary a lesbian -- that's the way to insult her, because we all know lesbians are evil.

wrong. I actively suppourt and encourage sexual and gender freedom. What I dislike, especially in elected officials is dishonesty.

Exhibit 1: Clinton's sham marriage to get votes.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
I think you're missing a distinction here. I believe it is only lesbians who make it with ugly women who are evil. Hot lesbian lovers are appreciated by both sides of the aisle*.


*Barbara Boxer excepted, maybe.

Technically I suppourt sexual and gender freedom for all, even the aesthetically challenged. I do have a bias against ugly people of any gender or sexual identity engaging in PDA.

As for Hillary, the distinction I am making is between the image she contrives and the truth. Why does she feel the need to pretend to be married to a serial rapist and sexual harasser when it is common knowledge inside DC that her interests lie elsewhere? (the joy of such other interests which should be celebrated not hidden). Is this a craven and dishonest attempt to get votes?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
did you read my public apology ....?

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
um, no.

I didn't think so. Maybe go back and read it and see if you are a big enough person to apologise.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Technically I suppourt sexual and gender freedom for all, even the aesthetically challenged. I do have a bias against ugly people of any gender or sexual identity engaging in PDA.

As for Hillary, the distinction I am making is between the image she contrives and the truth. Why does she feel the need to pretend to be married to a serial rapist and sexual harasser when it is common knowledge inside DC that her interests lie elsewhere? (the joy of such other interests which should be celebrated not hidden). Is this a craven and dishonest attempt to get votes?

Is this like contriving to be someone who cares and not responding to a Very Important Email?

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by nononono
I think you're missing a distinction here. I believe it is only lesbians who make it with ugly women who are evil. Hot lesbian lovers are appreciated by both sides of the aisle*.


*Barbara Boxer excepted, maybe.

So long as they don't try to marry each other.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Is this like contriving to be someone who cares and not responding to a Very Important Email?

Touche(accent over the "e")!

Full disclosure: "People who care" was my sock. I think. Or was it "a concerned poster"......maybe both.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
So long as they don't try to marry each other.

Marriage is an anachronistic institution and the government should get out of the business of regulating it.

Also, the concept of businesses providing spousal benefits to married employees is anachronistic inefficient drag on commerce and should go the way of the 40 hour work week.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I didn't think so. Maybe go back and read it and see if you are a big enough person to apologise.

Where's the public apology?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Where's the public apology?

What's wrong with you?

Open post to the Board

Post #3365

I just want to make a correction, an apology, for what I did in an earlier post. In a post titled "Where's Osama" I had a bad typographical and jpg error in one of my graphics. I was thinking about doing a post on the hunt for Osama bin Laden in this new year 2007 and at the same time posting breaking news on Senator Barack Hussien Obama's just announced Presidential bid.

Unfortunately I confused the one with the other and there was a typographical and graphic, whereby instead of saying "where is Obama", it said "where is Osama" and also I posted an Osama graphic instead of an Obama one. I want to apologize for that bad typo and graphical error. I want to also apologize personally to Senator Barack Hussien Obama. I'm going to be making a call to his office later this evening to offer my personal apology.

Best Regards,

Penske

eta: In fairness, I don't think my error was that egregious or shameful (hi ty!), afterall, consider what liberal reporter Jeane Moos said on CNN

"Osama's on the run, Obama's considering one......Maybe that explains how someone could confuse Obama with Osama. Only one little consonant differentiates the two names. And as if that similarity weren't enough. How about sharing the name of a former dictator? You know his middle name, Hussein."