» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 1,744 |
0 members and 1,744 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
08-08-2013, 03:47 PM
|
#3481
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
|
No. clear is available at fewer airports, and is only a line-cut anyway, not a license to keep on your shoes.
Better analysis here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/pract...use-179-a.html
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Last edited by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.); 08-08-2013 at 03:52 PM..
|
|
|
08-08-2013, 04:41 PM
|
#3482
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,173
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
the moth doesn't pay much. calling me a professional storyteller would be like adder claiming to be a professional lawyer.
|
ha! It's funny because it's true!
|
|
|
08-08-2013, 04:44 PM
|
#3483
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
08-08-2013, 06:22 PM
|
#3484
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i put on my robe and wizard hat
Posts: 4,838
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
A few years back Sean Penn's car got boosted during a movie shoot in Berkeley and when the radio reported it was a matte black Buick, I posted here to say basically WTF like you here but someone who knows cars (Chef?) informed us that Buick made muscle cars that are quite respectable to those "in the know" and I guess what I'm saying is if you don't know what's what can we look to Detroit for anything anymore?
|
Sounds like a Buick Grand National. Which hasn't been built in many many years as far as I know.
__________________
I'm going to become rich and famous after I invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
|
|
|
08-08-2013, 09:43 PM
|
#3485
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,148
|
Re: How do I tell a lawyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
|
Took a lotta work to find this , then no love?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 04:16 PM
|
#3486
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 05:39 PM
|
#3487
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,173
|
Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Ever since I got a new landline phone number after moving back to Minneapolis, I get periodic calls from someone purporting to be calling from an online pharmacy (using different company names at different times, if memory serves). The first time, I asked them not to call again and told them I'm on the do not call list and their call was illegal. This did not deter them. They were even so aggressive to call back immediate after I hung up on them.
So, obviously, something smells pretty fishy there. From time to time I'd think about keeping track of the calls and reporting them to the FTC or whoever, but I never really got around to it. The calls weren't that frequent, and it's not that hard to hang up. But I figured whoever used to have that number had maybe done some business with them.
Even fishier, of course, was that sometimes they would immediate ask "don't you want some pain medications?" Ah, so that's the deal. They're seeking addicts. Huh, wonder if they even pretend to send the drugs after you give them your credit card over the phone? The sale can't be legal, so why even bother? I'm not curious enough to want to try to find out.
But then comes the clever bit. Last night, there's a message on the old-school answering machine attached to the line (which we never use). It's someone claiming to be Special Agent Mark Thomas from the DEA calling for Bob Loblaw (name changed to protect the innocent) and wanting to ask some questions about online drug purchases that Bob had made.
Huh. Well, that makes some sort of sense (aside from calling out of the blue), because this wasn't the first time I'd heard Bob's name. Several years ago a collections agency called for that person, and it took a little doing to convince them they had the wrong number.
So that would all make sense. Maybe Bob had a problem and Bob used to buy narcotics over the phone, or try to. Maybe the DEA's now catching up to him.
So, I'm thinking, I'll call Agent Thomas back and tell him he's got the wrong number. Except that the phone number he left got cut off the message (again, old school answering machine). So, well, he had a 415 area code, so must be the San Francisco field office of the DEA. I'll just call the switchboard and ask for him. No problem.
Except, small problem. There is no Special Agent Mark Thomas at the DEA's San Fran field office. Huh. Time to Google. And look! People using that name have been trying to get people to send them money and making threats, and it's been happening enough that the DEA put out an alert about it.
So there you have it. Call to push the drugs. If that doesn't work, or stops, threaten them with a fake DEA agent. Pretty creative.
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 06:09 PM
|
#3488
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,148
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
Ever since I got a new landline phone number after moving back to Minneapolis, I get periodic calls from someone purporting to be calling from an online pharmacy (using different company names at different times, if memory serves). The first time, I asked them not to call again and told them I'm on the do not call list and their call was illegal. This did not deter them. They were even so aggressive to call back immediate after I hung up on them.
So, obviously, something smells pretty fishy there. From time to time I'd think about keeping track of the calls and reporting them to the FTC or whoever, but I never really got around to it. The calls weren't that frequent, and it's not that hard to hang up. But I figured whoever used to have that number had maybe done some business with them.
Even fishier, of course, was that sometimes they would immediate ask "don't you want some pain medications?" Ah, so that's the deal. They're seeking addicts. Huh, wonder if they even pretend to send the drugs after you give them your credit card over the phone? The sale can't be legal, so why even bother? I'm not curious enough to want to try to find out.
But then comes the clever bit. Last night, there's a message on the old-school answering machine attached to the line (which we never use). It's someone claiming to be Special Agent Mark Thomas from the DEA calling for Bob Loblaw (name changed to protect the innocent) and wanting to ask some questions about online drug purchases that Bob had made.
Huh. Well, that makes some sort of sense (aside from calling out of the blue), because this wasn't the first time I'd heard Bob's name. Several years ago a collections agency called for that person, and it took a little doing to convince them they had the wrong number.
So that would all make sense. Maybe Bob had a problem and Bob used to buy narcotics over the phone, or try to. Maybe the DEA's now catching up to him.
So, I'm thinking, I'll call Agent Thomas back and tell him he's got the wrong number. Except that the phone number he left got cut off the message (again, old school answering machine). So, well, he had a 415 area code, so must be the San Francisco field office of the DEA. I'll just call the switchboard and ask for him. No problem.
Except, small problem. There is no Special Agent Mark Thomas at the DEA's San Fran field office. Huh. Time to Google. And look! People using that name have been trying to get people to send them money and making threats, and it's been happening enough that the DEA put out an alert about it.
So there you have it. Call to push the drugs. If that doesn't work, or stops, threaten them with a fake DEA agent. Pretty creative.
|
Ty is busy at work right now, so he asked me to point out that the White House cannot control fake DEA agents.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 06:26 PM
|
#3489
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
Ty is busy at work right now, so he asked me to point out that the White House cannot control fake DEA agents.
|
Those are Putin's responsibility.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 06:42 PM
|
#3490
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,173
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
Ty is busy at work right now, so he asked me to point out that the White House cannot control fake DEA agents.
|
I'm sure we can all mainly agree.
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 07:53 PM
|
#3491
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
Ever since I got a new landline phone number after moving back to Minneapolis, I get periodic calls from someone purporting to be calling from an online pharmacy (using different company names at different times, if memory serves). The first time, I asked them not to call again and told them I'm on the do not call list and their call was illegal. This did not deter them. They were even so aggressive to call back immediate after I hung up on them.
So, obviously, something smells pretty fishy there. From time to time I'd think about keeping track of the calls and reporting them to the FTC or whoever, but I never really got around to it. The calls weren't that frequent, and it's not that hard to hang up. But I figured whoever used to have that number had maybe done some business with them.
Even fishier, of course, was that sometimes they would immediate ask "don't you want some pain medications?" Ah, so that's the deal. They're seeking addicts. Huh, wonder if they even pretend to send the drugs after you give them your credit card over the phone? The sale can't be legal, so why even bother? I'm not curious enough to want to try to find out.
But then comes the clever bit. Last night, there's a message on the old-school answering machine attached to the line (which we never use). It's someone claiming to be Special Agent Mark Thomas from the DEA calling for Bob Loblaw (name changed to protect the innocent) and wanting to ask some questions about online drug purchases that Bob had made.
Huh. Well, that makes some sort of sense (aside from calling out of the blue), because this wasn't the first time I'd heard Bob's name. Several years ago a collections agency called for that person, and it took a little doing to convince them they had the wrong number.
So that would all make sense. Maybe Bob had a problem and Bob used to buy narcotics over the phone, or try to. Maybe the DEA's now catching up to him.
So, I'm thinking, I'll call Agent Thomas back and tell him he's got the wrong number. Except that the phone number he left got cut off the message (again, old school answering machine). So, well, he had a 415 area code, so must be the San Francisco field office of the DEA. I'll just call the switchboard and ask for him. No problem.
Except, small problem. There is no Special Agent Mark Thomas at the DEA's San Fran field office. Huh. Time to Google. And look! People using that name have been trying to get people to send them money and making threats, and it's been happening enough that the DEA put out an alert about it.
So there you have it. Call to push the drugs. If that doesn't work, or stops, threaten them with a fake DEA agent. Pretty creative.
|
You need a hobby. I suggest beer.
TM
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 08:12 PM
|
#3492
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You need a hobby. I suggest beer.
|
Pointless arguments with Hank on the PB are cheaper and less filling.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 08:23 PM
|
#3493
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 08:37 PM
|
#3494
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,148
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Pointless arguments with Hank on the PB are cheaper and less filling.
|
all arguments with you are pointless. no offense.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
08-09-2013, 08:46 PM
|
#3495
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Almost, but I'm not quite that dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
all arguments with you are pointless. no offense.
|
When I'm mocking myself, it's not really cool to pile on.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|