A Black Hole of Happiness - Page 248

ltl/fb · 07-23-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Gave you a furlough from the Land of Fu to see your response. Here are some of the results of a two minute search, snycker:

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...647#post253647

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...822#post260822

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...190#post261190

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...340#post262340

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...842#post264842

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...128#post268128

Once again, you're completely full of shit.

TM

I wish LA had thunderstorms. I really miss thunderstorms.

patentparanyc · 07-23-2007, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I wish LA had thunderstorms. I really miss thunderstorms.

These pretzels are making me THIRSTY....

You know what TM? Just leave me alone. you waste so much time and energy into this stupid crap why? I'm a freaking janitor for all you care. no one cares. seriously. it's freaking scary that you took the time to search that.

ThurgreedMarshall · 07-23-2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
These pretzels are making me THIRSTY....

You know what TM? Just leave me alone. you waste so much time and energy into this stupid crap why? I'm a freaking janitor for all you care. no one cares. seriously.

If only you would stop giving me so much material. It's like you're a lying paigow without the brains.

TM

patentparanyc · 07-23-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
If only you would stop giving me so much material. It's like you're a lying paigow without the brains.

TM

what about you? you recently changed firms. were you asked to leave auto admit style?

Shape Shifter · 07-23-2007, 05:19 PM

nevermind

the ghost of Plated's Socks · 07-23-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc

I'm a freaking janitor for all you care.

HEY! Off Plated's corner, hoe!

ThurgreedMarshall · 07-23-2007, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
what about you? you recently changed firms. were you asked to leave auto admit style?

Here are the problems with this post:

1. You want me to leave you alone, but then you run off to try to dig something up on me.

2. You ask "What about you?" like I have somehow misrepresented to people that I am a lawyer at one firm and not another. I have not and it's no secret that I switched firms.

3. You imply that I was asked to leave. But I left with a partner for whom I have worked many years, for a better situation.

4. It doesn't have capital letters at the beginning of sentences because your fat little fingers aren't flexible enough to reach the shift keys, I assume.

TM

Shape Shifter · 07-23-2007, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Here are the problems with this post:

1. You want me to leave you alone, but then you run off to try to dig something up on me.

2. You ask "What about you?" like I have somehow misrepresented to people that I am a lawyer at one firm and not another. I have not and it's no secret that I switched firms.

3. You imply that I was asked to leave. But I left with a partner for whom I have worked many years, for a better situation.

4. It doesn't have capital letters at the beginning of sentences because your fat little fingers aren't flexible enough to reach the shift keys, I assume.

TM

Did you get promoted to associate?

patentparanyc · 07-23-2007, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Here are the problems with this post:

1. You want me to leave you alone, but then you run off to try to dig something up on me. and I've known for a while you switched firms.

2. You ask "What about you?" like I have somehow misrepresented to people that I am a lawyer at one firm and not another. I have not and it's no secret that I switched firms.

3. You imply that I was asked to leave. But I left with a partner for whom I have worked many years, for a better situation.

4. It doesn't have capital letters at the beginning of sentences because your fat little fingers aren't flexible enough to reach the shift keys, I assume.

TM

1. I've tried to ignore you and not respond and you still attack me. in fact, when you posted about this I had been innocuously posting not about you or anything related about you until you posted and posted until I was left no choice but to explain.

2. Not at all. I'm saying from the outside one could interpret a situation many ways and twist it around which is what you did with mine. you implied I purposely deceived the board when I did not. That I was never a paralegal. I did not announce the change. but when I registered I was a paralegal. that I did not continue to announce it when I changed-- is because I knew you would react exactly in this manner. why go there?

3. this whole stupid convo is petty do you really look down on secretaries that much that this is even a big deal? I have great respect for secretaries. we bust our buts on complex financial docs. my skills have ramped up considerably with the deal docs. you sound like a petty begrudging snob. bottom line if i'm so stupid and so pathetic ignore me. don't waste time on me. and you can't.

dtb · 07-23-2007, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Here are the problems with this post:

1. You want me to leave you alone, but then you run off to try to dig something up on me.

2. You ask "What about you?" like I have somehow misrepresented to people that I am a lawyer at one firm and not another. I have not and it's no secret that I switched firms.

3. You imply that I was asked to leave. But I left with a partner for whom I have worked many years, for a better situation.

4. It doesn't have capital letters at the beginning of sentences because your fat little fingers aren't flexible enough to reach the shift keys, I assume.

TM

TM, help me out, here.

I'm guessing that what you're saying is that by referring us to her numerous posts calling herself a paralegal when she wasn't suggests that it is she who has the problem with being a secretary. Because if she didn't, she'd just have said, "I stopped being a paralegal to make more money as a secretary" (or whatever reason she did it).

Or maybe you're saying that snicky's calling herself a paralegal when she isn't is just another example of how she lies about stupid stuff?

Or is it something else?

ThurgreedMarshall · 07-23-2007, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
1. I've tried to ignore you and not respond and you still attack me.

You got me there. You're just so stupid that I can't help it.

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
2. Not at all. I'm saying from the outside one could interpret a situation many ways and twist it around which is what you did with mine. you implied I purposely deceived the board when I did not. That I was never a paralegal. I did not announce the change. but when I registered I was a paralegal.

I don't doubt that you were a paralegal. But don't try to act like you haven't purposefully pretended like you're still a paralegal when you're not.

But here's the thing: No one gives a shit either way. Your stupidity makes it amazing that you could hold down any job. I really don't think anyone here cares whether you are a paralegal, secretary or Benny from LA Law's fat little sister.

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
3. this whole stupid convo is petty do you really look down on secretaries that much that this is even a big deal? I have great respect for secretaries. we bust our buts on complex financial docs. my skills have ramped up considerably with the deal docs. you sound like a petty begrudging snob.

Ridiculous. Pure and simple. For the most obvious reasons (to those who know me).

TM

patentparanyc · 07-23-2007, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
TM, help me out, here.

I'm guessing that what you're saying is that by referring us to her numerous posts calling herself a paralegal when she wasn't suggests that it is she who has the problem with being a secretary. Because if she didn't, she'd just have said, "I stopped being a paralegal to make more money as a secretary" (or whatever reason she did it).

Or maybe you're saying that snicky's calling herself a paralegal when she isn't is just another example of how she lies about stupid stuff?

Or is it something else?

Can I ask you something? Why is it necessary that I announce to the board when my position changes? Like anyone cares? But obviously they do since he made a big deal about it....

AND IF I HAD ANNOUNCED IT? PEOPLE WOULD HAVE SAID "HUZZAH NO ONE CARES WHY U ANNOUNCING?"

who cares? is his point that I had a duty to announce when it changed? I felt I had no such duty.

or the point is "I'm so insecure and pompous I would lead people to believe I still was one" or is he so careless he thought I never was one to begin with? I go with that. he thought i never was one and it was a BEEG scandal that I lied. which I didn't. what i am guilty of is "failure to announce a change." so now he's backpedaling and bleating that I was wrong to not announce. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

"I don't doubt that you were a paralegal. But don't try to act like you haven't purposefully pretended like you're still a paralegal when you're not.

But here's the thing: No one gives a shit either way. Your stupidity makes it amazing that you could hold down any job. I really don't think anyone here cares whether you are a paralegal, secretary or Benny from LA Law's fat little sister."

ahghgheheheheheahahah I'm apolplectic. YOU posted a special post pointing out that I had "lied" and been deceitful. I did not bring this up. I could care less. Like I said those that are supposed to know already know. what is the big deal? no one cares. secty/para very similar duties. not totally diff. tool.! gawd!

dtb · 07-23-2007, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Can I ask you something? Why is it necessary that I announce to the board when my position changes? Like anyone cares? But obviously they do since he made a big deal about it....

who cares? is his point that I had a duty to announce when it changed? I felt I had no such duty.

You know what? I said the very same thing to someone (that you're under no obligation to announce that you're now a secretary). However, the "rub" is that you have since represented yourself as a paralegal when you're not. It's the misrepresentation that people find funny -- not the fact that you're a secretary or a mailroom person, or whatever you are.

Let me ask YOU something... Say you'd gone to medical school (or law school, or whatever school) at night over the last few years and were now working as a doctor, lawyer, researcher, whatever -- do you think you'd announce the change then?

patentparanyc · 07-23-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
You know what? I said the very same thing to someone (that you're under no obligation to announce that you're now a secretary). However, the "rub" is that you have since represented yourself as a paralegal when you're not. It's the misrepresentation that people find funny -- not the fact that you're a secretary or a mailroom person, or whatever you are.

Let me ask YOU something... Say you'd gone to medical school (or law school, or whatever school) at night over the last few years and were now working as a doctor, lawyer, researcher, whatever -- do you think you'd announce the change then?

I think that under duress [TM stalking and "trying to torment" me] I was under special circumstances not to give him anything else fodder to go on.

I switched areas of law too. But he's not breaking my chops over Patent to Corporate. is he?

you are saying if I went to grad school I'd make a big fuss to RT to petition to become CORPATTY or some lame crap because I'm a shallow one dimensional pompous fop?

who knows. I have zero plans to go.

The bottom line here is he singles me out to abuse me and it won't stop I refuse to knowingly give him more to work with. If I do so inadvertantly so be it.

ThurgreedMarshall · 07-23-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
TM, help me out, here.

I'm guessing that what you're saying is that by referring us to her numerous posts calling herself a paralegal when she wasn't suggests that it is she who has the problem with being a secretary. Because if she didn't, she'd just have said, "I stopped being a paralegal to make more money as a secretary" (or whatever reason she did it).

Or maybe you're saying that snicky's calling herself a paralegal when she isn't is just another example of how she lies about stupid stuff?

Or is it something else?

All good guesses. But your ability to reason and your brains are just getting in the way.

The real answer is that I hate secretaries. They are beneath me in every way. Every chance I get to humiliate them, I must take. I do not associate with them and I find their odor to be noxious and their manner unpleasant.

TM