LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 178
0 members and 178 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2004, 03:45 PM   #3751
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Well, actually, Hank...Pony did. Then Bilmore jumped in and agreed with Pony, but said he'd prefer it if the firestorm only fried "the bad Arabs." But he didn't say he wouldn't drop them because a nuke isn't smart enough to figure out who the good Arabs and the bad Arabs are.

And he does keep parading these lists of bad Arabs out, hoping that eventually we'll stop asking how it is that he was born with magical powers that will allow him to figure out who the good Arabs and the bad Arabs are.
Arabs aren't bad - Islam is bad. The best bomb we can drop on the Arabs is globalization. We must flood their countries with American goods and basically westernize their culture. Bombs are quite expensive. We could probably subsidize western franchises in the mideast for a fraction of the price. Sounds nuts, eh? I'm serious. If you pipe satellite cable television to these people and give them all the toys, clothes, gadgetry and other crap that's made us a pretty soulless consumption machine, you will kill the fundamentalism. You won't create anything great, but it will be fat, lazy and self-absorbed... hardly the sort of society which could easily find 19 guys willing to die in a plane crash.

We need to make these Arabs selfish. Selfish people aren't willing to die for anything.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:50 PM   #3752
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Kill them All, or at Least the Ones Bilmore Picks

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
You went well beyond the guilty, and indicated you wanted to kill all the guilty and anyone associated with the guilty. Now you're flip flopping and saying, oh, jee, maybe I don't want to kill everyone who sits silently by, maybe I want to just kill those sitting silently by if they're having bad thoughts while they sit silently by. And, of course, saying you were being "subtle", oh, yuck, yuck.
You are so ready to make a point that you can't read one.

I was contrasting with Pony's posts. Go back and maybe see why. It might help you decipher things.

Hank, cancel the contest.
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:51 PM   #3753
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Kill them All, or at Least the Ones Bilmore Picks

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
This is a loooong way from "I agree with Pony, but let's design nukes that only kill people with funny hats. It's also the first time you've actually said "we can't simply nuke them."
Explicitly? Yeah.

You can't aim too low around here, can you?
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:51 PM   #3754
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Well, i think Pony was speaking mostly out of anger, but realized that nuking random cities wasn't justified, really. He can answer that if he'd like. I think B's point was more hypothetical- he'd like to launch the magic nuke that kills those who deserve it. But implicit is the lack of such a smart weapon (fucking Clinton budget cuts).
Oh, well I take it all back. It's not racist if you only think about doing it.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:56 PM   #3755
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Oh, well I take it all back. It's not racist if you only think about doing it.
Your critical reading skills are lacking. You want me to have race as a point in common. My chosen point in common was guilt. And my final point was, but how can we know?

But it's easier to just cry "racist", right?
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:57 PM   #3756
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Kill them All, or at Least the Ones Bilmore Picks

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Explicitly? Yeah.

You can't aim too low around here, can you?
You were arguing awfully hard for someone who was satirizing, Bilmore.

But hey, if that was what you were doing, all I can say is I'm glad. Because if you weren't, you were being pretty fucking scary, dude.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:59 PM   #3757
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Kill them All, or at Least the Ones Bilmore Picks

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
You were arguing awfully hard for someone who was satirizing, Bilmore.
I was arguing hard for my definition of guilty. I'd already made the point that the definition was unusable in terms of identifying people.

Cast that "racist", "nuke-happy" shit a bit more lightly.
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 03:59 PM   #3758
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Oh, well I take it all back. It's not racist if you only think about doing it.
if you mean its racist to think I would like to kill all the Islamic peoples who would capture a school, rape 13 year old girls, shoot babies, make mom's do a Sophie's choice and eventually kill hundreds of kids, then put me on that list. Even you haven't defended the terrorists, are you holding back?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:00 PM   #3759
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Your critical reading skills are lacking. You want me to have race as a point in common. My chosen point in common was guilt. And my final point was, but how can we know?

But it's easier to just cry "racist", right?
Thinking something doesn't equal guilt, Bilmore. Your written point in common was "don't think like us."
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:03 PM   #3760
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Thinking something doesn't equal guilt, Bilmore.
And all those good germans who hated the jews figured they were okay as long as they weren't actually turning on the gas.
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:04 PM   #3761
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
And all those good germans who hated the jews figured they were okay as long as they weren't actually turning on the gas.
They weren't okay, but they weren't war criminals.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:05 PM   #3762
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
They weren't okay, but they weren't war criminals.
I guess we just need to agree to disagree on that one.
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:06 PM   #3763
baltassoc
Caustically Optimistic
 
baltassoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City That Reads
Posts: 2,385
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you mean its racist to think I would like to kill all the Islamic peoples who would capture a school, rape 13 year old girls, shoot babies, make mom's do a Sophie's choice and eventually kill hundreds of kids, then put me on that list. Even you haven't defended the terrorists, are you holding back?
It's only racist because you felt the need to insert the word "Islamic." Let's try it without:

I would like to kill all the people who would capture a school, rape 13 year old girls, shoot babies, make mom's do a Sophie's choice and eventually kill hundreds of kids[.]

Yeah, see, makes perfect sense without it, and not racist at all. And more accurate, I suspect. Unless you're giving the Baptists a free pass to rape and murder kids. And maybe you are, Hank. Maybe you are.
__________________
torture is wrong.
baltassoc is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:07 PM   #3764
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
It's only racist because you felt the need to insert the word "Islamic." Let's try it without:

I would like to kill all the people who would capture a school, rape 13 year old girls, shoot babies, make mom's do a Sophie's choice and eventually kill hundreds of kids[.]

Yeah, see, makes perfect sense without it, and not racist at all. And more accurate, I suspect. Unless you're giving the Baptists a free pass to rape and murder kids. And maybe you are, Hank. Maybe you are.
Islam isn't a race.
bilmore is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:09 PM   #3765
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
If racism isn't anger, is it love?

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
And all those good germans who hated the jews figured they were okay as long as they weren't actually turning on the gas.
And here we arrive at bottom.

These discussions of group responsiblity are quite fun, as they allow us to play extensively with the definition of the group, and the extent of responsibility.

Though certainly different in scale, it strikes me that this discussion bears some resemblance to Atticus' position that supporters of the GOP bear some degree of responsiblity for the forseeable effects of the policy that its Administration and Congress hath wrought.

Shall I put you down for a "yes" on that one?
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.