» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 356 |
0 members and 356 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
11-08-2007, 08:41 PM
|
#3766
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I wouldn't go so far as to be ashamed to be at the same school, but yeah.
The State Dept. has to staff the embassy, apparently, and it's not like they haven't asked for volunteers. I guess it depends on loyalty to an employer in the difficult position of having to staff wildly unpopular jobs, compounded by the fact that your employer doesn't have the option to just move out of that business.
I would not have a lot of loyalty to the State Dept. under the W. Admin, possibly. But I wouldn't bitch publicly and act like they had no right to tell me that my job is going to be X. I would either do it or quit. And bitch endlessly, of course, but it wouldn't be about how my employer is morally WRONG to do it -- WTF is the State Dept. supposed to do? Leave the embassy massively understaffed? How would your friend feel if he had volunteered to go there, and was stuck there, and then everyone else refused to go even when told to, and the State Dept. said "OK, just cope with being really understaffed -- we can't make people go there, and no one else volunteered. So, well, sucks to be you."
|
but the blogs Ty reads, they say the employees are right??? who to believe????
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 11-08-2007 at 09:03 PM..
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:04 PM
|
#3767
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I wouldn't go so far as to be ashamed to be at the same school, but yeah.
The State Dept. has to staff the embassy, apparently, and it's not like they haven't asked for volunteers. I guess it depends on loyalty to an employer in the difficult position of having to staff wildly unpopular jobs, compounded by the fact that your employer doesn't have the option to just move out of that business.
I would not have a lot of loyalty to the State Dept. under the W. Admin, possibly. But I wouldn't bitch publicly and act like they had no right to tell me that my job is going to be X. I would either do it or quit. And bitch endlessly, of course, but it wouldn't be about how my employer is morally WRONG to do it -- WTF is the State Dept. supposed to do? Leave the embassy massively understaffed? How would your friend feel if he had volunteered to go there, and was stuck there, and then everyone else refused to go even when told to, and the State Dept. said "OK, just cope with being really understaffed -- we can't make people go there, and no one else volunteered. So, well, sucks to be you."
|
(1) It's about the largest embassy in the world. So "understaffed" is an odd way to put it.
(2) They could offer people more money to go. That's how it works with, e.g., the Blackwater people guarding the diplomats.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:07 PM
|
#3768
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
but the blogs Ty reads, they say the employees are right??? who to believe????
|
(1) My original source is e-mail from my friend, a FSO, who was a candidate to be sent to Iraq.
(2) I pointed out there were blogs with conflicting views. I have read them, too.
(3) My friend was bitching about it publicly. Only to family and friends. That seems fair.
(4) You are a dope sometimes.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:18 PM
|
#3769
|
For what it's worth
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
|
sweet, sweet irony
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Poll: is this the most unbelievable statement ever on the PB?
|
Yes
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:22 PM
|
#3770
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
(1) My original source is e-mail from my friend, a FSO, who was a candidate to be sent to Iraq.
(2) I pointed out there were blogs with conflicting views. I have read them, too.
(3) My friend was bitching about it publicly. Only to family and friends. That seems fair.
(4) You are a dope sometimes.
|
atticus said he's only seen 1 post where i seemed stupid.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:54 PM
|
#3771
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
atticus said he's only seen 1 post where i seemed stupid.
|
No, you've said many stupid things, and in that sense you "seemed" stupid many times. All along I interpreted this to mean that you were wrong, not stupid. By contrast, I don't believe you were trying to sound stupid about the "Bin Laden endorses Kerry" thing. That post caused me to be concerned that you were stupid.
Ty, perhaps a Venn diagram?
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 10:56 PM
|
#3772
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
So actually find out the facts with respect to your benefits, people, for fuck's sake.
|
I tried to do that and you were unhepful.
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:02 PM
|
#3773
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
unhepful.
|
that word has the same grammatical legitimacy as irregardless.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:02 PM
|
#3774
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
caption, please
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
|
"No, I wanna be Dean -- you be Frank!"
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:09 PM
|
#3775
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
flipflop
|
I meant the original Atticus
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:10 PM
|
#3776
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I tried to do that and you were unhepful.
|
thank you. when fringey and i have our quarrels it's amazing how often the objective observers take my side. can you say 100%?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:49 PM
|
#3777
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Ty, perhaps a Venn diagram?
|
![](http://bp2.blogger.com/_FBXGhy-QmVw/RzOHhOq5XQI/AAAAAAAABR0/0TTz-9NUECc/s320/card1154.JPG)
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 11:53 PM
|
#3778
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I tried to do that and you were unhepful.
|
You said that was w/r/t your personal savings, not some executive benefits. You pay me $5,000, I will figure out your life insurance shit, richie-rich-boy.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 01:39 PM
|
#3779
|
Serenity Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
|
Peggy Noonan on Clinton v. Thatcher
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 01:48 PM
|
#3780
|
Guest
|
Peggy Noonan on Clinton v. Thatcher
"Hillary Clinton: She's No Margaret Thatcher."
You can't buy publicity like that. Thanks Peggy!
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|