Politics As Usual

[Not Me]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
So, yours are like totally obvious if you exert yourself at all? Cool. Like a stripper.

Strippers almost always have overs to avoid the distortion problem when they do things like pole dance. Unless they are small silicone implants, overs are very obvious because you can see the implant edges.

Mine look fine in clothes and a sports bra. The only time you see the distortion is if I am naked. Implants aren't perfect and I never said that they were. For me the only question is are they better than what I looked like pre-op. The answer for me is yes. YMMV.

[mongoose767]

Originally posted by Not Me


Mine look fine in clothes and a sports bra. The only time you see the distortion is if I am naked The answer for me is yes. YMMV.

Picture please? Hit me up on PM and I'll give you the email addy! Hoo yeah!

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by mongoose767
Picture please? Hit me up on PM and I'll give you the email addy! Hoo yeah!

"It rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the hose again."

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by sgtclub
I don't consider you nasty, but if I worked with you I would want to speak to Mrs Sidd and get her to loosen the rations a little.

I am sweetness and light at work. I use the PB to vent -- it really helps.

Thanks, all of you, for your participation in this. Especially the Wahhabi Repubs -- yelling at Ty all day, or getting into discussions with AG that I can't understand, wouldn't really do the trick.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
discussions with AG that I can't understand,

lil' hint. He doesn't understand what he says either. Its all regurgitated google.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by the Spartan
K-E-R-R-Y.

[URL=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1089170977782]Ex-Kuwaiti Amb.: Kerry "catastrophic" for Mid East (AP)

Lemme guess -- this is the ex-Kuwaiti Ambassador who sent his daughter to Congress in 1991 with the false story about Iraqis pulling infants out of incubators?

[the Spartan]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Lemme guess -- this is the ex-Kuwaiti Ambassador who sent his daughter to Congress in 1991 with the false story about Iraqis pulling infants out of incubators?

Which makes him about as credible as the average "statesman" in the Middle east and vastly more credible than the liberals favorite arab frontman Arafat or their favorite newssource Al Jizzera. So what's the problem? Obviously the leadership of the Arab world is coalescing behind W and that is another good reason, i.e. stability in the ME and continued success in the War on Terror, to rally behind him. Remind me again of Kerry's foreign leader support...Chirac?

In other observations, I see the latest polls show the race as Kerry49% W 41%, after the Edwards selection debacle. I would have thought Kerry would have gotten a much bigger bump....10-15 percentage points. This is a big plus for W as he heads towards the coronation in NYC!

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by the Spartan
Which makes him about as credible as the average "statesman" in the Middle east and vastly more credible than the liberals favorite arab frontman Arafat or their favorite newssource Al Jizzera. So what's the problem?

Nothing at all. One guy who lied to the American public to convince the US to go to war against Iraq supports another. Kismet!

I'm surprised that even you would suggest that liberals like Al Jazeera. Have you forgotten that all of the major US media are in the liberals' pocket? Why go to the trouble of finding Al Jazeera when we can get the party line from any major news station or paper?

But don't worry. Inherent contradictions in your themes are not a sign of insanity anymore than those monkeys flying outside your window are.

[the Spartan]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch


I'm surprised that even you would suggest that liberals like Al Jazeera. Have you forgotten that all of the major US media are in the liberals' pocket? Why go to the trouble of finding Al Jazeera when we can get the party line from any major news station or paper?
.

Al Jizzerra is the model that the liberals aspire to. Thus far market forces have prevented them from attaining that level of rank propagandization of the media, but the dream remains.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by the Spartan
Al Jizzerra is the model that the liberals aspire to. Thus far market forces have prevented them from attaining that level of rank propagandization of the media, but the dream remains.

Cite, please, you fucking psycho.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by the Spartan
, I see the latest polls show the race as Kerry49% W 41%, after the Edwards selection debacle. I would have thought Kerry would have gotten a much bigger bump....10-15 percentage points. This is a big plus for W as he heads towards the coronation in NYC!

Why would they pick a guy who can only help them in a helpless part of the country? the South was conceded once they picked Kerry. No way they win anything in the South; David Duke couldn't overcome the negative from Kerry.
At least Gore had the smarts to pander to the Jewish votes in Pa and Mi. and Fla. In 2000, if they had geared up the "get out the convict vote" a little better in Fla. they might have won. Anyway, I don't see why they didn't pick someone who can help them win at least one more state.

edit: Sorry, forgot Duke is a R., substitute his D. equivalent Sen. Byrd.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by the Spartan
Which makes him about as credible as the average "statesman" in the Middle east and vastly more credible than the liberals favorite arab frontman Arafat or their favorite newssource Al Jizzera. So what's the problem? Obviously the leadership of the Arab world is coalescing behind W and that is another good reason, i.e. stability in the ME and continued success in the War on Terror, to rally behind him. Remind me again of Kerry's foreign leader support...Chirac?

In other observations, I see the latest polls show the race as Kerry49% W 41%, after the Edwards selection debacle. I would have thought Kerry would have gotten a much bigger bump....10-15 percentage points. This is a big plus for W as he heads towards the coronation in NYC!

Nice call, Ty.

http://lawtalkers.com/forums/showthr...479#post107479

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Nothing at all. One guy who lied to the American public to convince the US to go to war against Iraq supports another. Kismet!

I'm surprised that even you would suggest that liberals like Al Jazeera. Have you forgotten that all of the major US media are in the liberals' pocket? Why go to the trouble of finding Al Jazeera when we can get the party line from any major news station or paper?

But don't worry. Inherent contradictions in your themes are not a sign of insanity anymore than those monkeys flying outside your window are.

Speaking of media control, nearly half the employees of Voice of America signed a petition that protesting what they consider a push to slant their coverage in a political way. At the heart of the issue is the dismanteling of VoA's Arab language programming and the coincidental launch of a new Arab language program under a different aegis. The charter of VoA (passed by Congress) requires balanced reporting. The new program is not bound by VoA's charter.

http://www.thehill.com/news/070604/voa.aspx

See also, http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown....l-2004&prgId=3 (scroll down to piece on NPR)

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by the Spartan
Al Jizzerra is the model that the liberals aspire to. Thus far market forces have prevented them from attaining that level of rank propagandization of the media, but the dream remains.

My 12 year old son had a Social Studies teacher who routinely touts the lib dogma. For my son's sake I am okay, as I can teach him about the negative influence of this agenda. Also, the less polished 7th grade fellow traveller is not as sophisticated, as say a network anchor, so my son can learn to filter larger chunks of obvious bullshit before he needs deal with the greater evil of, say, CNN. But what of the other children whose parents are not as dillegent?

And, I ask you Penske, do you truly believe you would become a tenured middle school teacher if you told the truth and worked in Clinton's failures and how they led to 3000 ashy bodies?

[Replaced_Texan]

So Tom Ridge says we're definitely probably going to be attacked by Al Quaida sometime between now and November (though since everyone was warned back in December to look out for suspicious people buying almanacs, maybe the terrorists were thwarted from getting reliable intel on when the election is...). I'm cool with that, thanks for the heads up, Mr. Ridge, I'll get my duct tape and plastic sheeting out of the attic. BUT, wait a second! Mr. Ridge also says that he's not moving the terror threat level from the on-edge, but-not-too-on-edge Yellow to the more-uncomfortably-on-edge Orange. Should I still get the plastic sheeting and duct tape to a more readily accessable location or not?

I' m conflicted. On the one hand, we're about to be attacked. On the other hand, our terror threat level is pretty much at the same level it has been since they put the system in place. On the other other hand, back in May, John Ashcroft said that we were going to be attacked at some point this summer. It's all terribly confusing. I'm beginning to think that perhaps, maybe, possibly the terror threat level system has a flaw... Or perhaps, maybe, possibly, someone's trying to scare the crap out of me.