LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 800
0 members and 800 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2004, 11:31 AM   #3841
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Why are you watching gay porn? Does sockless man on man action make you hot?

TM
Does naked woman-on-woman action make you hot?
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:32 AM   #3842
evenodds
prodigal poster
 
evenodds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I shouldn't post and compose this motion at the same time. Need to focus on one or the other.
Definitely focus on the motion.
__________________
My enemies curse my name, but rave about my ass.
evenodds is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:34 AM   #3843
evenodds
prodigal poster
 
evenodds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
Reality Lawyers TV

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
It was only a matter of time... from realityblurred:

What sort of "major law firm" would make one of these kids a partner? Sounds suspicious.
That sounds very April Fools to me.

First of all, who would watch such nonsense?

Is there a less interesting group of people than newly minted lawyers? (Aside from law students of course.)
__________________
My enemies curse my name, but rave about my ass.
evenodds is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:35 AM   #3844
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Does naked woman-on-woman action make you hot?
Duh. Maybe its because we feel we could add to the scene if only we could be there. I never heard women liking guy on guy though. Do those "couples" pornos have the occasional guy/guy scene?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:36 AM   #3845
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
Reality Lawyers TV

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
It was only a matter of time... from realityblurred:

What sort of "major law firm" would make one of these kids a partner? Sounds suspicious.
I would guess one with multi-tiers of partnership.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:37 AM   #3846
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
dunkin, no-nuts

Quote:
Originally posted by Anne Elk
I believe she did it during a game in 2002. I'm sure Sports Center will go over the stats and highlights tonight.

ETA - Link to ESPN article here. Leslie was the first woman to dunk in a WNBA game.
She was indeed. Any woman dunking is very impressive (even though she's like 6'8). Especially in a game. For the large part, they just can't seem to do it.

I don't understand why the women's NCAA and the WNBA don't lower the rims. The ball is already smaller. Why not make their game more exciting? That said, I think the NBA needs to raise their rims. I would like the dunk to be exciting again.

So I watched that girl dunk three balls last night (there's an opening if I've ever seen one). One straight dunk and two more straight dunks with some crap she did before she left the ground (like putting the ball behind her back and pretending to dunk while covering her eyes, even though she moved her arm well before she took off). Crap. She's 6'4. If you're 6'4 and can't dunk (man, woman or Hank), you're pathetic.

ESPN showed only her dunks. Tonight we get to see who she beat. Tune in to ESPN yourself and then report back on why she won.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:37 AM   #3847
Did you just call me Coltrane?
Registered User
 
Did you just call me Coltrane?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by evenodds
Definitely focus on the motion.
Does this mean you don't want me to post here? Or does mean you want me to post here, but not concentrate on my posts?

Please clarify your insult. "Choose your own adventure" insults were invented by Paigow.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
Did you just call me Coltrane? is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:39 AM   #3848
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Thank you for this story. I always felt like a hick 'cuz I loved Dolly's song, and thought Whitney's was . . . ugh. Now, I know I was simply seeing truth.
I don't get it. Her song doesn't sound as good because she's a self-absorbed, psycho, crack ho? Whitney's version is 10 times as good.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:42 AM   #3849
notcasesensitive
Flaired.
 
notcasesensitive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Duh. Maybe its because we feel we could add to the scene if only we could be there. I never heard women liking guy on guy though. Do those "couples" pornos have the occasional guy/guy scene?
Well, there have been studies that have shown that women who are exposed to any kind of porn get aroused by it, vs. men who only get aroused by specific types of porn (w-w or straight sex porn). I would guess that since m-m sex doesn't seem to create the same visceral reaction in straight women that it does in (some) straight men, women are more open to seeing the arousing qualities in any visual depiction of sex. This is limited, of course, to women who are willing to watch porn in the first place (a smaller % of the overall female population than the % of men who are willing to watch porn, I'm sure).

I've never watched m-m porn, so I can't give you any anecdotal evidence on this one. Maybe I'll rent some this weekend.
notcasesensitive is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:44 AM   #3850
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Duh. Maybe its because we feel we could add to the scene if only we could be there. I never heard women liking guy on guy though. Do those "couples" pornos have the occasional guy/guy scene?
I don't know re: "couples" pornos.

The rest, I just have no response to because it is too stupid.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:48 AM   #3851
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't get it. Her song doesn't sound as good because she's a self-absorbed, psycho, crack ho? Whitney's version is 10 times as good.

TM
Now, despite Whitney's issues annoying me, I love her voice. Powerful, subtle, wide range, etc. And I like her version of I Will Always Love You.

But I think Dolly's voice works with the song better. As she sings it, it is more of a sad lament, while Whitney's is more of a powerful declaration. Toe-may-toe, etc.

And back to the question of covers, how can one (and by "one" I mean "me") forget the Byrds covering Dylan? Hey, Mister Tambourine Man, indeed.
Not Bob is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:50 AM   #3852
Bad_Rich_Chic
In my dreams ...
 
Bad_Rich_Chic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
More socks!

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I'm guessing that totally naked but for socks ...
Just in the interests of full disclosure, I have to speak out in favor of besocked sex, on occasion at least. Such as when it is cold out and someone has cold feet (literally, I mean). Nothing is more of a turn off than to be getting it on and then having someone touch the back of your knee with their ICE COLD FEET. (Other than suddenly spotting a booger leaking from your beloved's nose during cold and flu season.) I've had sex in thigh-highs and stilettos, and sex in ratty bunny slippers, and in hiking boots, and you know what? Sex is fun whatever you've got on your feet.

BR(and even with the socks off, believe me, you don't look that cool anyway)C
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
Bad_Rich_Chic is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:50 AM   #3853
Did you just call me Coltrane?
Registered User
 
Did you just call me Coltrane?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't get it. Her song doesn't sound as good because she's a self-absorbed, psycho, crack ho? Whitney's version is 10 times as good.

TM
Dolly's version is better. It just depends on what kind of voice you prefer. If you like that over-the-top "look at my range" Xtina type of song, then you would probably like Whit's version. Dolly has (or had) the range - she just doesn't display it or abuse it every chance she gets. Moreover, Dolly's version has some emotion behind it. It's not just a vehicle to manifest her talent. The latter is a reason why many lesser technical singers are still regarded as great singers. Neil Young's voice is pretty awkward, but you can tell that the words he sings are very important to him. He means them. Whitney sang that song to showcase her talent. Dolly probably sang it about someone. And meant it. You can tell the difference.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
Did you just call me Coltrane? is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:51 AM   #3854
evenodds
prodigal poster
 
evenodds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
dunkin, no-nuts

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall

ESPN showed only her dunks. Tonight we get to see who she beat. Tune in to ESPN yourself and then report back on why she won.
Her chief competition whiffed his last two dunks.

Plus, they liked the Dee Brown homage.
__________________
My enemies curse my name, but rave about my ass.
evenodds is offline  
Old 03-31-2004, 11:52 AM   #3855
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
More music! More talk! More commercials!

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I don't know re: "couples" pornos.

The rest, I just have no response to because it is too stupid.
It was a valid question, and, I believe interesting. Compare ncs' answer for an implicit answer to your question re. "Why is fringe not a moderator?"
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.