Toronto Trim's Hotel Cum Drop-in Centre

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
It actually makes me angry to think a man would give up a woman who wants to hook up with other women in front of him. .

What if she never does him the courtesy of asking him to join the fun?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
You have been in committed relationships with the wrong men.

No fucking shit. I'd have her in movies and traction by now. I'd probably experience 10th grade fucking-in-the-tv-room-while-the-folks-are-sleeping -upstairs style premature ejaculation before I could even get it in any orifice if I had a couple hot chicks messing around in my place.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What if she never does him the courtesy of asking him to join the fun?

You can't always get what you want...

Count your blessings and start stroking it.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What if she never does him the courtesy of asking him to join the fun?

Yeah. That's what went wrong in my marriage.

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by Not Bob
I was think along those lines, too. (Not that I have any actual experience in this.) Perhaps your ex and the soon to be former mr. brazen didn't like the idea of y'all kissing anyone else, irregardless (ha! I love saying that) of the fact that it was another chick instead of another dude.

Yep. In theory, girl on girl action turned the ex Mr. Kiss on. But not when one of the girls was me.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
You know, we hear this all the time but in my experience, in committed relationships, with the exception of the one I am currently in, the men have NOT viewed the kissing girls as a positive AT ALL.

Abba, I've told you this before, but you refused to listen. Your ex-husband is a closeted gay.

[Not Bob]

From http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/47662004.htm via Defamer:

• Ben Affleck reportedly misses his infamous toe-sucking sessions with ex fiancée Jennifer Lopez. The Hollywood heartthrob, who is now romancing screen beauty Jennifer Garner, is said to have told friends his new lover doesn’t share J.Lo’s bizarre fetish, known as “shrimping”. A pal of the actor revealed: “Ben was embarrassed when his toe-sucking exploits were revealed. But he’s been joking that it’s the only thing he misses about JLo”.

Who knew that J.Lo had a bizarre fetish?

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Bob
From http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/47662004.htm via Defamer:

• Ben Affleck reportedly misses his infamous toe-sucking sessions with ex fiancée Jennifer Lopez. The Hollywood heartthrob, who is now romancing screen beauty Jennifer Garner, is said to have told friends his new lover doesn’t share J.Lo’s bizarre fetish, known as “shrimping”. A pal of the actor revealed: “Ben was embarrassed when his toe-sucking exploits were revealed. But he’s been joking that it’s the only thing he misses about JLo”.

Who knew that J.Lo had a bizarre fetish?

I thought that you determined that the FB does not find [no brackets]toe-sucking[/no brackets] to be all that bizarre. Don't you mean a practically vanilla fetish?

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I thought that you determined that the FB does not find [no brackets]toe-sucking[/no brackets] to be all that bizarre. Don't you mean a practically vanilla fetish?

At the risk of committing a number 2 whiff on the Thurgreed scale, I was quoting the article in an attempt at humor. Even if toe-sucking qualifies as a fetish, it surely is closer to vanilla than to bizarre.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Bob
At the risk of committing a number 2 whiff on the Thurgreed scale, I was quoting the article in an attempt at humor. Even if toe-sucking qualifies as a fetish, it surely is closer to vanilla than to bizarre.

Ah, so I committed an Original Whiff? That's cool. I also know how to play with fire.

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Apparently there are three definitions or applications or whatever of "Whiff."

1. The original meaning: When someone posts a subtle joke and someone else responds to that post not seeing the joke, while making the same exact joke in a not-so-subtle manner. This is a classic whiff.

2. The easy meaning: When someone responds to a joke post sincerely, completely missing the joke.

3. The Paigow/most popular (lately) meaning: A response to anyone who doesn't read your post in the way only you could understand it. Or, in the alternative, a cop-out when someone nails you for making no sense.

Whatever the meaning, it has been played out for roughly two years now.

TM

OK, so in variations 1 and 2, you have someone posting a joke and the difference between the original (#1) and the paigow (#2) is that someone eithe rmakes a blatant joke that is just a louder NFHer version of the oirginal, while the paigow version is just missing the joke of the first post altogether.

I think I get this now. Same means, different ends.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Ah, so I committed an Original Whiff? That's cool. I also know how to play with fire.

I have no idea.

Uh, does this re line mean I've blown my shot at [toe-sucking]?

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Bob
I have no idea.

Uh, does this re line mean I've blown my shot at [toe-sucking]?

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I caught pieces of it. Its a weird malady, isn't it? I can focus intensely, but I'm constantly thinking about all these contingencies coming in from all sorts of directions. Frustrates the piss out of people I work with, but it works well in court. You know the other side's next move early, but your offense is always running at half speed because you're constantly hedging to avoid getting fucked on small points you think your opponent is going to nail you with later.

I want one of those lobotomies like that Kennedy zombie. Get me thinking straight.

For the first time I thougth this was a Coltrane post originally, until I saw "all these contingencies coing in from all sorts of directions". Then I thought it was Coltrane doing SEbby. Then I saw the suit facing to the right.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Should I be a logic timmy and note that it really only supports the theory that an age difference of 23 years is too much (ie., maybe they would have been fine if he were only 6 years younger than her) or not?

this is a whiff.