Merry Generic Winter Day-Off With No Religious Content

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I am not sure that I have everything straight. I didn't think there was any sort of chilling effect or hostile climate caused by MR posting about his inclinations, just good-natured ribbing leading to his eventual nickname of Rimjob. Which has now been used so often (although he hasn't been around for years) that it's kind of lost its effect. If someone were to post about his/her poo fetish, that might lead to expressions of disgust and some kind of perjorative nickname, but life would go on. I always thought people were generally free to talk about whatever pleased them -- they just had to be willing to deal with it if something that pleases them is a little non-mainstream and they got made fun of for it.

If I have missed something along the way, please set me straight.

See, e.g., GWNC is a cock-sucking goddess.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
If I have missed something along the way, please set me straight.

Good grief. I really do come across as an arrogantly sanctimonious twit, don't I?

Anyway, I was mostly joking (the reason I say "mostly" is because it does surprise me that this den of iniquity can be so judgmental on occasion), and offering what I thought was a moderately amusing commentary on the subject.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Good grief. I really do come across as an arrogantly sanctimonious twit, don't I?

Anyway, I was mostly joking (the reason I say "mostly" is because it does surprise me that this den of iniquity can be so judgmental on occasion), and offering what I thought was a moderately amusing commentary on the subject.

Ewww. Gross.

Arrogantly sanctimonious twit? Now that is one thing I would NEVER do.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Please define "current climate" and explain how you think it came to be.

Well, I'll try. It's a little chilly in Podunkville, and I think that it's because of the high pressure front stretching down from the North. On, and it's January.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Good grief. I really do come across as an arrogantly sanctimonious twit, don't I?

Anyway, I was mostly joking (the reason I say "mostly" is because it does surprise me that this den of iniquity can be so judgmental on occasion), and offering what I thought was a moderately amusing commentary on the subject.

Ahhh. That makes things clearer. Ha -- I never thought you were being sanctimonious; I just didn't know what was going on.

[nononono]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Well, I'll try. It's a little chilly in Podunkville, and I think that it's because of the high pressure front stretching down from the North. On, and it's January.

That's code for some really kinky stuff, isn't it?

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Is that what you think that I am doing? To the contrary, my good man. It's the current climate which freezes discussion of anything sexual (other than the only slighly exaggerated categories I listed), not my nicey-niceness. I simply offered a warning to any unwary, and a suggestion on how to get around the impure bluenoses.

Speaking of nicey-nice, I embrace my nicey-niceness. But why do you suggest that I am trying to make this place homogenous?

I don't think anyone declined to discuss normal sexual talk here because MR got labeled an ass-licker by paigow.

Anyone who has avoided talking about deviant sexual behavior isn't going to start posting about such behavior using some idiotic insert like [toe-sucking].

Whoever it was the other day (nonono?) who declined to give details about the non-vanilla sex she was having with her new boyfriend (or wasn't having with her ex-husband) is either (i) full of shit about the differences between the two types of sex, which means she couldn't post details about it because we'd all call her on it and/or (ii) just wanted some attention. Or maybe she didn't want to discuss it at all. But if that's the case, it surely has nothing to do with being labeled. And even if it did, what would a redacted description of such activity do for anyone here anyway?

As for your question, I think you try to protect people who are adults and can think for themselves. And because you want everyone to conform to this nicey nice standard so that they can avoid any pain or shame that comes along with whatever label we (read: paigow) could attach to a colorful post or conversation, you are trying to rob us of interesting posts -- making the board boring and homogenous.

Who the fuck wants to read through posts like, "Okay, since you asked...I really enjoy [toe-sucking] and last night, I was so sore because my boyfriend decided [toe-sucking] no longer did it for him, so he [toe-sucked] the shit out of me instead."

And as far as I can tell, you're the only one on the board who wants everyone to be nice to each other all the time anyway. I know it's part of your schtick, but what's the point?

TM

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by nononono
That's code for some really kinky stuff, isn't it?

NotBob=Frank Booth's SP.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
By PM, TM explained that the hypotheticals that I ignored were Hank's, not his. Truly, that is how we roll on the PB.

No. They were hypos I posted in response to Hank's trying to help your argument that you didn't respond to.

TM

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't think anyone declined to discuss normal sexual talk here because MR got labeled an ass-licker by paigow.

Anyone who has avoided talking about deviant sexual behavior isn't going to start posting about such behavior using some idiotic insert like [toe-sucking].

Whoever it was the other day (nonono?) who declined to give details about the non-vanilla sex she was having with her new boyfriend (or wasn't having with her ex-husband) is either (i) full of shit about the differences between the two types of sex, which means she couldn't post details about it because we'd all call her on it and/or (ii) just wanted some attention. Or maybe she didn't want to discuss it at all. But if that's the case, it surely has nothing to do with being labeled. And even if it did, what would a redacted description of such activity do for anyone here anyway?

As for your question, I think you try to protect people who are adults and can think for themselves. And because you want everyone to conform to this nicey nice standard so that they can avoid any pain or shame that comes along with whatever label we (read: paigow) could attach to a colorful post or conversation, you are trying to rob us of interesting posts -- making the board boring and homogenous.

Who the fuck wants to read through posts like, "Okay, since you asked...I really enjoy [toe-sucking] and last night, I was so sore because my boyfriend decided [toe-sucking] no longer did it for him, so he [toe-sucked] the shit out of me instead."

And as far as I can tell, you're the only one on the board who wants everyone to be nice to each other all the time anyway. I know it's part of your schtick, but what's the point?

TM

I know I've said this about a thousand times.

I totally have a crush on you. I really really want to [toe-suck] you.

And yes, I am asking you out.

[nononono]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't think anyone declined to discuss normal sexual talk here because MR got labeled an ass-licker by paigow.

Anyone who has avoided talking about deviant sexual behavior isn't going to start posting about such behavior using some idiotic insert like [toe-sucking].

Whoever it was the other day (nonono?) who declined to give details about the non-vanilla sex she was having with her new boyfriend (or wasn't having with her ex-husband) is either (i) full of shit about the differences between the two types of sex, which means she couldn't post details about it because we'd all call her on it and/or (ii) just wanted some attention. Or maybe she didn't want to discuss it at all. But if that's the case, it surely has nothing to do with being labeled. And even if it did, what would a redacted description of such activity do for anyone here anyway?

As for your question, I think you try to protect people who are adults and can think for themselves. And because you want everyone to conform to this nicey nice standard so that they can avoid any pain or shame that comes along with whatever label we (read: paigow) could attach to a colorful post or conversation, you are trying to rob us of interesting posts -- making the board boring and homogenous.

Who the fuck wants to read through posts like, "Okay, since you asked...I really enjoy [toe-sucking] and last night, I was so sore because my boyfriend decided [toe-sucking] no longer did it for him, so he [toe-sucked] the shit out of me instead."

And as far as I can tell, you're the only one on the board who wants everyone to be nice to each other all the time anyway. I know it's part of your schtick, but what's the point?

TM

Ahem, TM, iirc, you edited your post to a "nevermind." Did you really want a detailed list of scenes and scenarios? FTR, I'm clear on the distinctions (as I see them), and I wasn't looking for attention, just speaking off the top of my head about a few things that were on my mind. So there!

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
As for your question, I think you try to protect people who are adults and can think for themselves. And because you want everyone to conform to this nicey nice standard so that they can avoid any pain or shame that comes along with whatever label we (read: paigow) could attach to a colorful post or conversation, you are trying to rob us of interesting posts -- making the board boring and homogenous.

Do I interject myself into every argument on the board like some sort of free-lance peacemaker? It may seem that way, sometimes, true. But I don't recall telling you and Ty to be nice to each other in discussing the roughing the passer rule.

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
And as far as I can tell, you're the only one on the board who wants everyone to be nice to each other all the time anyway. I know it's part of your schtick, but what's the point?

And you need a hug. I know that's part of your schtick, too.

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I know I've said this about a thousand times.

I totally have a crush on you. I really really want to make you wear a diaper and scrub my floors with your tongue.

And yes, I am asking you out.

Fuck this toe-sucking shit.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Fuck this toe-sucking shit.

That is not what I had in mind for his tongue.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Fuck this toe-sucking shit.

If scrubbing my floor with your tongue is what will do it for you, have at it. Please be aware that there may be some raw egg on the floor, and I will not be held responsible for any intestinal disorders that might result from that.

I draw the line at diapers, even if they are purely for show. Sorry.



ETA alas, I have not re-encountered back-hurting guy.