» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 371 |
0 members and 371 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
03-02-2005, 10:14 PM
|
#4126
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
Quote:
Originally posted by Skeks in the city
She's probably an activist, given that Clinton appointed her and she worked full time for left-wing organizations before becoming a judge. If she is an activist, it's possible some right-wing wacko other than the white power dude killed her. Activist judges have many wacko enemies who believe their activities are an affront to God, racism, &c, &c.
|
After all, she was an Episcopalian Jew, or married to an Episcopalian Jew.
If she were an activist, wouldn't you think she'd have ruled against the white supremacists in the first place?
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 10:28 PM
|
#4127
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 721
|
Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
After all, she was an Episcopalian Jew, or married to an Episcopalian Jew.
If she were an activist, wouldn't you think she'd have ruled against the white supremacists in the first place?
|
It's hard to say. Activist liberal judges sometimes are sticklers on business issues, and only indulge their activist tendencies on what they purport to be civil rights issues. Anyway, the activist judges should take this as a reminder that being appointed for life doesn't mean for very long, if you get yourself killed.
Last edited by Skeks in the city; 03-02-2005 at 10:30 PM..
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 10:36 PM
|
#4128
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
If anything, that sounds like it was written by club/spanky's people. "When drawing up congressional districts, states should be allowed to ignore geography and make obscure districts of mostly minorities (ie, racial gerrymandering)"
eta my top person was Breyer, I think, then Stevens. Maybe vice-versa.
|
Breyer
Ginsburg
O'Connor
Souter
Kennedy
Stevens
Rehnquist
Scalia
Thomas
I guessed Ginsburg would be number 1. I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order).
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 10:48 PM
|
#4129
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order).
|
that's right! You were the one bothered by an educated vocabulary.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 11:15 PM
|
#4130
|
Classified
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Sorry. I fixed it above, or you can find it here.
|
O'Connor
Kennedy
Rehnquist
Breyer
Ginsberg
Souter
Scalia
Thomas
The first and last two don't surprise me. I was a little surprised that the Chief was 3rd.
S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 11:24 PM
|
#4131
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
that's right! You were the one bothered by an educated vocabulary.
|
So you think it all turned on her answer to the "capitol" punishment question? Hmmm.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 11:30 PM
|
#4132
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
So you think it all turned on her answer to the "capitol" punishment question? Hmmm.
|
She has been bothered since he used plebiscite
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 11:44 PM
|
#4133
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
Quote:
Originally posted by Skeks in the city
She's probably an activist, given that Clinton appointed her and she worked full time for left-wing organizations before becoming a judge. If she is an activist, it's possible some right-wing wacko other than the white power dude killed her. Activist judges have many wacko enemies who believe their activities are an affront to God, racism, &c, &c.
|
The real activists now are the conservatives. Get with it. It's not like lefties are trying to bring back Lochner or anything.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 01:55 AM
|
#4134
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Breyer
Ginsburg
O'Connor
Souter
Kennedy
Stevens
Rehnquist
Scalia
Thomas
I guessed Ginsburg would be number 1. I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order).
|
Ginsburg
Stevens
Breyer
Souter
O'Connor
Kennedy
Rhenquist
Scalia
Thomas
Shocking, all around.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 02:14 AM
|
#4135
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
The real activists now are the conservatives. Get with it. It's not like lefties are trying to bring back Lochner or anything.
|
Our takeover isn't complete until International Shoe gets tossed aside.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 03:31 AM
|
#4136
|
For what it's worth
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
|
Go Figure
Ginsburg
Breyer
Souter
O'Conner
Scalia
Kennedy
Rehnquist
Stevens
Thomas
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 04:00 AM
|
#4137
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Go Figure
Quote:
Spanky
Ginsburg
Breyer
Souter
O'Conner
Scalia
Kennedy
Rehnquist
Stevens
Thomas
|
You've gotta be kidding me. I'm revoking my proxy, Eugene McCarthy.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 10:25 AM
|
#4138
|
usually superfluous
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the comfy chair
Posts: 434
|
Go Figure
Ginsburg
Scalia
Breyer
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
O'Connor
Stevens
Rehnquist
#2 seems a bit out of place.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 12:15 PM
|
#4139
|
In my dreams ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
|
another quiz, jurisprude-style
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
O'Connor
Kennedy
Rehnquist
Breyer
Ginsberg
Souter
Scalia
Thomas
The first and last two don't surprise me. I was a little surprised that the Chief was 3rd.
S_A_M
|
Woah -
O'Connor
Kennedy
Rehnquist
Scalia
Thomas
Ginsberg
Breyer
Souter
Stevens
BR(How did some of you manage to get Scalia and Thomas in any order other than one after the other?)C
eta: SAM, you're missing one
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 12:26 PM
|
#4140
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Go Figure
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
You've gotta be kidding me. I'm revoking my proxy, Eugene McCarthy.
|
#1: Breyer
#2: Souter
#3: Ginsburg
#4: O'Connor
#5: Scalia
#6: Stevens
#7: Thomas
#8: Kennedy
#9: Rehnquist
How come no polygamy questions?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|