Fashion Board - Muse to the Fucktards

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
"Cocaine's a hell of a drug."

I thought it was "crack is wack"

[Adder]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
signed,

the voice of experience...........

While I agree I have no idea what I am doing, I am not a transactional lawyer.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Isn't that when you're supposed to bust out the "you monkey-fucking scribe" trump card?

In the "he who laughs last" department that dude made partner. the monkey kid better hope he doesn't run into Ankar now.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
From Banker's Ball:

less than hearty female representation on the Street: NY Times.

http://www.bankersball.com/2006/08/0...n-wall-street/

I love that on the same webpage as the Where are the Female Bankers? article is a poll that reads as follows:

I've plucked my eyebrows, or gotten my brows plucked
Yes
No
Maybe once, and only because the gf insisted

So the anticipated poll audience seems to be men. Perhaps the lack of webpages dedicated to female bankers has something to do with the lack of female bankers?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by NotFromHere

Who was it that said that "if you can't be a role model, at least be an example?"

Hank.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Adder
While I agree I have no idea what I am doing, I am not a transactional lawyer.

So how do you know that they have no idea what they are doing?

[Fugee]

Originally posted by Adder
In there "defense," they have absolutely no idea what they are doing....

That's why it is so frustrating. A substantive defense of a provision is something you can discuss rationally and figure out alternative language that works for both sides. But "it's our form" is just plain annoying.

[Adder]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
So how do you know that they have no idea what they are doing?

I know quite a few of them.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Adder
I know quite a few of them.

And?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Fugee
That's why it is so frustrating. A substantive defense of a provision is something you can discuss rationally and figure out alternative language that works for both sides. But "it's our form" is just plain annoying.

How about, "he who has the gold makes the rules"?

[Adder]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
And?

They readily admit to not knowing what they are doing.

[Fugee]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
How about, "he who has the gold makes the rules"?

That one is less frustrating when that one comes out after you at least have a substantive discussion and the banker says no.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by Fugee
That one is less frustrating when that one comes out after you at least have a substantive discussion and the banker says no.

What kind of "form" like an ISDA Master? that type of form or a boilerplate agreement.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Adder
They readily admit to not knowing what they are doing.

I think you mean knot nowing.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Adder
They readily admit to not knowing what they are doing.

Clue: No one knows what they (individually) are doing. Seniority just brings the ability to fake it better.