All Hank, all the time. - Page 287

SlaveNoMore · 08-17-2006, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Penske_Account
Word on the Nutmegg street is that he is begging the governor for R sources of money to fuel the Joementum for another 2 months. He is going to be beholden to someone, and it ain't gonna be anyone with the initials D.N.C.

Do you think he's growing tired of Kos and DU referring to him as "Rape Guerney Joe"?

Hank Chinaski · 08-17-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Word on the Nutmegg street is that he is begging the governor for R sources of money to fuel the Joementum for another 2 months. He is going to be beholden to someone, and it ain't gonna be anyone with the initials D.N.C.

really. does money even play into this one? who doesn't know both at this point? the truly dumb who have trouble to even clip the right ballot box might not know who they should vote for, but that's all Dem machine votes. Joe used to get it, but he has to do w/o this time. He doesn't need the money. he needs the R label.

Penske_Account · 08-17-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Do you think he's growing tired of Kos and DU referring to him as "Rape Guerney Joe"?

NWTF does that mean?

Penske_Account · 08-17-2006, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
really. does money even play into this one? who doesn't know both at this point? the truly dumb who have trouble even clip the right box might not know who they should vote for but that's all Dem machine votes. Joe used to get it, but he has to do w/o this time. He don't need the money. he needs the R label.

I think you know money for a GOTV effort. Turnout can fuck up the results.

Penske_Account · 08-17-2006, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
NWTF does that mean?

I figured it out. Wow. These libs are some sick twisted fucks, I sure hope their moms are proud.

Why do they hate America so?

Tyrone Slothrop · 08-17-2006, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Ty,

I guess you are right....the lure of the Democrat party will certainly be too strong for Lieberman to jump ship...

A group of Senate Democrats is growing increasingly angry about Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (D-Conn.) campaign tactics since he lost the Democratic primary last week.

If he continues to alienate his colleagues, Lieberman could be stripped of his seniority within the Democratic caucus should he defeat Democrat Ned Lamont in the general election this November, according to some senior Democratic aides.

Some people think Joe staying in the race will hurt Dems running against CT incumbent Reps; some people think it will help. I can't decide who's right.

Tyrone Slothrop · 08-17-2006, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Word on the Nutmegg street is that he is begging the governor for R sources of money to fuel the Joementum for another 2 months. He is going to be beholden to someone, and it ain't gonna be anyone with the initials D.N.C.

He's not beholden to anyone. Remember? He's a man of great principle. You can't buy him.

(You can only hope to contain him?)

Penske_Account · 08-17-2006, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Some people think Joe staying in the race will hurt Dems running against CT incumbent Reps; some people think it will help. I can't decide who's right.

Rell has the governor's seat locked up.

Penske_Account · 08-17-2006, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
He's not beholden to anyone. Remember? He's a man of great principle. You can't buy him.

(You can only hope to contain him?)

I can smell your fear through the ether of the interwebberian blogosphere. Lieberman will be the '06 symbol of the Democrat Party's failure to capitalise on electoral opportunity, again.

Tyrone Slothrop · 08-18-2006, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Rell has the governor's seat locked up.

And Cantwell is going to win the WA Senate race, but those aren't the races we're talking about.

Tyrone Slothrop · 08-18-2006, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I can smell your fear through the ether of the interwebberian blogosphere. Lieberman will be the '06 symbol of the Democrat Party's failure to capitalise on electoral opportunity, again.

This might make sense if Lamont and Lieberman were going to split the Dem vote and allow Schlesinger to pick up a Dem seat.

In. Your. Dreams.

Penske_Account · 08-18-2006, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
And Cantwell is going to win the WA Senate race, but those aren't the races we're talking about.

Don;t sell McGavick short, he is the unwritten underdog story of 06.

Penske_Account · 08-18-2006, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This might make sense if Lamont and Lieberman were going to split the Dem vote and allow Schlesinger to pick up a Dem seat.

In. Your. Dreams.

I am going on the record as predicting:

Lieberman (CT-R), as of January 1, 2007.

Pretty Little Flower · 08-18-2006, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I am going on the record as predicting:

Lieberman (CT-R), as of January 1, 2007.

In case y'all were wondering, I still don't read this board. Or post on it.

sebastian_dangerfield · 08-18-2006, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Some people think Joe staying in the race will hurt Dems running against CT incumbent Reps; some people think it will help. I can't decide who's right.

One thing's for sure. It makes the Dems looks awfully disorganized. Which ain't good in elections riding heavily on national security.