Fashion Board 6-9-04 to 7-13-04

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by dtb
You know, you've just made me realize why it might be that my son (almost 6!) has taken a sudden interest in going commando.

I was thinking it was because I hadn't bought him new underwear in a while, and the kind he has was getting too small -- but that makes me feel like a neglectful mother, so I will delude myself into thinking that it is the summer weather.

(Don't worry -- I recently bought him appropriately sized undies.)

You want to hear about our bouncey boy, don't you?

He's a nice kid, really, in spite of his home life; I mean, most kid's would grow up neurotic, what with Martha here carrying on the way she does; sleeping 'til four in the PM, climbing all over the poor bastard, trying to break down the bathroom door to wash him in the tub when he's sixteen, dragging strangers into the house at all hours...

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by dtb
Would someone of the male persuasion please explain to me the utter fascination/obsession with girl-on-girl action? I mean, sure, I know everyone here digs porno and all that, but why is the girl-on-girl so disproportionately titillating (ha!)?

Is it because two chicks are sexed-up?

Yes.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by dtb
Would someone of the male persuasion please explain to me the utter fascination/obsession with girl-on-girl action? I mean, sure, I know everyone here digs porno and all that, but why is the girl-on-girl so disproportionately titillating (ha!)?

Is it because two chicks are sexed-up (that's the way the kids these days speak), and that all they need is you, you, you to make their encounter complete? (as if)

Somebody, please explain.

The chicks in TMs pictures don't even look aroused.

Oh, wait, that's because they need THE MAN to come over and arouse them so they can be happy.

FWIW, I like seeing/hearing/feeling guys get off; maybe that's what guys like about the lesbian thing. Two women getting off at the same time.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You want to hear about our bouncey boy, don't you?

He's a nice kid, really, in spite of his home life; I mean, most kid's would grow up neurotic, what with Martha here carrying on the way she does; sleeping 'til four in the PM, climbing all over the poor bastard, trying to break down the bathroom door to wash him in the tub when he's sixteen, dragging strangers into the house at all hours...

Is all of this about George and Martha Washington? Why do you speak of a founding father and his loving, supportive wife in this sick way?

[Watchtower]

Originally posted by dtb
Would someone of the male persuasion please explain to me the utter fascination/obsession with girl-on-girl action? I mean, sure, I know everyone here digs porno and all that, but why is the girl-on-girl so disproportionately titillating (ha!)?

Is it because two chicks are sexed-up (that's the way the kids these days speak), and that all they need is you, you, you to make their encounter complete? (as if)

Somebody, please explain.

God gave us these hormones as a way to help us understand homosexuality. It's God's way of undermining the Christian right.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by leagleaze
it is right at the start of the movie.

Which is a good thing, because the rest of the movie is god-awful. But I agree, that scene is hot. On par with some scenes in Bound.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by dtb
Would someone of the male persuasion please explain to me the utter fascination/obsession with girl-on-girl action? I mean, sure, I know everyone here digs porno and all that, but why is the girl-on-girl so disproportionately titillating (ha!)?

Is it because two chicks are sexed-up (that's the way the kids these days speak), and that all they need is you, you, you to make their encounter complete? (as if)

Somebody, please explain.

Well for me the motivation is on a deep psychological level. For a woman to engage is girl/girl means she is honest about her desires, and doesn't just buy into what she is told is right. If she's honest with herself, I can expect she'll be honest with me, and that is the second sexiest thing.

She also is self-confident enough to explore her being. And a self-confident woman brings less baggage to our relationship.

Also, for the most part she is intelligent enough to have considered the encounter, and how she'll respond. An intelligent woman is the sexiest thing.

So, here I have the chance to hit the jackpot: honesty, self-confidence and intelligence all together, but better-times 2. I think that's what gets most guys.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Well for me the motivation is on a deep psychological level. For a woman to engage is girl/girl means she is honest about her desires, and doesn't just buy into what she is told is right. If she's honest with herself, I can expect she'll be honest with me, and that is the second sexiest thing.

She also is self-confident enough to explore her being. And a self-confident woman brings less baggage to our relationship.

Also, for the most part she is intelligent enough to have considered the encounter, and how she'll respond. An intelligent woman is the sexiest thing.

So, here I have the chance to hit the jackpot: honesty, self-confidence and intelligence all together, but better-times 2. I think that's what gets most guys.

You should post more.

[the Spartan]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Are we sure those aren't boys? They seem to be positioned to obscure the crotch area a bit and don't seem to have discernable breasts.

This may be outable, but a reliable rumour has it that the pic is really of Slave and Shapeshifter. Keep it on the d-l, sts.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by dtb
Would someone of the male persuasion please explain to me the utter fascination/obsession with girl-on-girl action? I mean, sure, I know everyone here digs porno and all that, but why is the girl-on-girl so disproportionately titillating (ha!)?

Is it because two chicks are sexed-up (that's the way the kids these days speak), and that all they need is you, you, you to make their encounter complete? (as if)

Somebody, please explain.

Two tits good, four tits better.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Well for me the motivation is on a deep psychological level. For a woman to engage is girl/girl means she is honest about her desires, and doesn't just buy into what she is told is right. If she's honest with herself, I can expect she'll be honest with me, and that is the second sexiest thing.

She also is self-confident enough to explore her being. And a self-confident woman brings less baggage to our relationship.

Also, for the most part she is intelligent enough to have considered the encounter, and how she'll respond. An intelligent woman is the sexiest thing.

So, here I have the chance to hit the jackpot: honesty, self-confidence and intelligence all together, but better-times 2. I think that's what gets most guys.

Nice one.

1. She is honest about wanting to be with a woman instead of with a man like society tells her, but she is with you.

2. Being with women is a sign of honesty, yet when bnb, rp, abba, etc. talk about being with other women they are called "man-pleasers."

3. Screwing around with another woman is wrong wrong wrong, yet everyone on here knows that men are really into it.

Bravo!

And MR, you are a fucking moron. As usual. It's pathetic.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

I think Hank was being facetious

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by dtb
or a banana that has that chalky taste when it's not ripe enough.

This can ruin my day. That chalky taste lingers in your mouth for hours. And I eat a lot of bananas.

[Mister_Ruysbroeck]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
And MR, you are a fucking moron. As usual. It's pathetic.

And Hank posts too much. As usual. It's pathetic.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I think Hank was being facetious

I know. By pretending to attack Hank, I was trying to make my slap at MR less obvious. I don't think MR was being facetious.

But I could be wrong.