» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 663 |
0 members and 663 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Reply](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
10-25-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#4396
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Re: H1N1 Virus Flu Shots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
You could say the same thing about economic expert reports. While a good economic expert (who primarily but not exclusively tend to be the defense side, btw) will do more work than you suggest, and can add real value to the analysis, its not like the finder of fact hears anything other than "defense guy say X and plaintiff's guy says Y."
|
The only difference between the economic experts and the others is they'll whack up the bill to six figures having accting associates read irrelevant boxes of docs before they'll give you their initial assessments.
The expert testimony industry stands at the base of everything completely fucked up in the litigation business. If there's a bigger racket, I've yet to see it. For further reading, check this out: http://www.caller2.com/2005/pics/PTO29jurisdiction.pdf
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 10-25-2009 at 11:02 PM..
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 12:31 AM
|
#4397
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Re: H1N1 Virus Flu Shots
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
|
2.
I actually had a case that was low budget (but ended up my first million dollar case). we hired a really low budget damages guy. I told him "1 version of your report."
my case gets thrown out, i go to appeal, get my case back in, and 3 years later we headed for trial- I look at my "experts" report, and he has 4 versions on his computer. he was a mess and I decide to skip that. the Judge bi-furcates, which buys time. I win and now it's damage time. I say, I ain't using an expert. I'll prove my damages with the infringer's testimony and my president's. the other lawyer actually moved to have my case thrown out since i couldn't prove damages w/o an expert. huh? the weird thing was the judge actually thought about it, i could tell he was about to step on my case.
i hate experts.
but, since this is the parents board, i will say this- if you can get your kids into a position where they're hired as an expert, that is a lucrative thing.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 07:29 AM
|
#4398
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Re: H1N1 Virus Flu Shots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
2.
I actually had a case that was low budget (but ended up my first million dollar case). we hired a really low budget damages guy. I told him "1 version of your report."
my case gets thrown out, i go to appeal, get my case back in, and 3 years later we headed for trial- I look at my "experts" report, and he has 4 versions on his computer. he was a mess and I decide to skip that. the Judge bi-furcates, which buys time. I win and now it's damage time. I say, I ain't using an expert. I'll prove my damages with the infringer's testimony and my president's. the other lawyer actually moved to have my case thrown out since i couldn't prove damages w/o an expert. huh? the weird thing was the judge actually thought about it, i could tell he was about to step on my case.
i hate experts.
but, since this is the parents board, i will say this- if you can get your kids into a position where they're hired as an expert, that is a lucrative thing.
|
Ever dealt with an "Expert Broker"?
"Yeah, I need a [insert type of expert], from out of state."*
"I got one in Maryland."
"Fine. How many times has he testified?"
"He's got a few under his belt, but it's all good. He can handle himself. Knows the drill. Where can I fax the C.V.?"
Parents should be careful their kids don't get into this crowd, IMHO.
* So nobody knows too much about him/her.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 03:41 PM
|
#4399
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
Salami from Katz's
|
That's for boys in the Army.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 03:45 PM
|
#4400
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: H1N1 Virus Flu Shots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
2.
I actually had a case that was low budget (but ended up my first million dollar case). we hired a really low budget damages guy. I told him "1 version of your report."
my case gets thrown out, i go to appeal, get my case back in, and 3 years later we headed for trial- I look at my "experts" report, and he has 4 versions on his computer. he was a mess and I decide to skip that. the Judge bi-furcates, which buys time. I win and now it's damage time. I say, I ain't using an expert. I'll prove my damages with the infringer's testimony and my president's. the other lawyer actually moved to have my case thrown out since i couldn't prove damages w/o an expert. huh? the weird thing was the judge actually thought about it, i could tell he was about to step on my case.
i hate experts.
but, since this is the parents board, i will say this- if you can get your kids into a position where they're hired as an expert, that is a lucrative thing.
|
That's actually my dream career move. If I could start getting tax expert gigs, it would improve the quality of my life tenfold.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 05:13 PM
|
#4401
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MetaPenskeLand
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk
That's for boys in the Army.
|
Or prison, eg Madoff.
__________________
I am on that 24 hour Champagne diet,
spillin' while I'm sippin', I encourage you to try it
|
|
|
03-01-2010, 11:45 AM
|
#4402
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
board dead
everyone solved all of their kid questions?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
03-01-2010, 02:54 PM
|
#4403
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MetaPenskeLand
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: board dead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
everyone solved all of their kid questions?
|
We still have that little issue, npi, out there, but I told your wife to save the money on the paternity tests. I think we know what's what ![Wink](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif) ![Wink](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif) ![Smilie](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
I am on that 24 hour Champagne diet,
spillin' while I'm sippin', I encourage you to try it
|
|
|
05-24-2010, 12:50 AM
|
#4404
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
yes or no, kids a positive or a negative?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
05-24-2010, 10:54 AM
|
#4405
|
[witticism TBA]
Join Date: May 2007
Location: n00bville
Posts: 919
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
yes or no, kids a positive or a negative?
|
Kids = A positive. Does that mean I can't complain about parenthood sometimes?
__________________
Two men say they're Jesus; one of them must be wrong.
|
|
|
05-24-2010, 11:00 AM
|
#4406
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
yes or no, kids a positive or a negative?
|
Doesn't this depend on the kids? I mean, my offspring are wonderful, but I often worry about the neighbors'. And the notion of Slave, Jr. does leave me with a bit of trepidation.
As to your kids, while I know I've heard Justice Holmes-style concerns, I also know that there is a tendancy for IQ to move toward the mean, so I don't share those worries.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 05-24-2010 at 11:04 AM..
|
|
|
05-24-2010, 02:00 PM
|
#4407
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
yes or no, kids a positive or a negative?
|
I love mine. They're both a lot of fun and veru interesting in their own way. What's more, aside from the pets, they are the only two creatures on the planet who really love me.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
05-24-2010, 03:44 PM
|
#4408
|
Classified
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
yes or no, kids a positive or a negative?
|
All things considered, a net positive.
S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
|
|
|
05-27-2010, 03:29 PM
|
#4409
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MetaPenskeLand
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secret_Agent_Man
All things considered, a net positive.
S_A_M
|
You're not a CPA, yes?
__________________
I am on that 24 hour Champagne diet,
spillin' while I'm sippin', I encourage you to try it
|
|
|
06-08-2010, 11:16 AM
|
#4410
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
Re: General discussion - Mom and Dad Esq.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
![Reply](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|