Fashion Board 3-5-04 to 4-6-04

[evenodds]

Originally posted by Not Me
Not looking to be treated better or worse. Leagle's point to me that started this whole thing is that I needed to censor what I said about Tiger 's problems with his race because that might offend you since you are married to a black man. That is ridiculous. I could careless if you get your feelings hurt because I think that many black man who marry white women do that not out of love but out of internalized racism.

I couldn't care less what you think. You're incapable of hurting my feelings with respect to any issue, least of all your opinions on interracial relationships.

This was never about me, this was about you being intentionally race-baiting to stir posts. So, thanks!

[Not Me]

Originally posted by evenodds
I couldn't care less what you think. You're incapable of hurting my feelings with respect to any issue, least of all your opinions on interracial relationships.

As it should be. Someone should tell Leagle.

Originally posted by evenodds
This was never about me, this was about you being intentionally race-baiting to stir posts. So, thanks!

No, it started out about you and that is why I was the target of censorship.

So according to you, if I bring up a sensitive racial topic and don't adhere to the PC party line (i.e., black men who marry white women do it only out of love) then I am race baiting? Reeeediculous.

Grow the fuck up idiot. My opinion is not rare, it is just rarely spoken because of the screams of racism that emanate from people like you and Tush Munch.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Not Me
So according to you, if I bring up a sensitive racial topic and don't adhere to the PC party line (i.e., black men who marry white women do it only out of love) then I am race baiting? Reeeediculous.

Not necessarily. I've seen you do worse.

http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/cl...?msg_id=001wZ4

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Me
Not looking to be treated better or worse. Leagle's point to me that started this whole thing is that I needed to censor what I said about Tiger 's problems with his race because that might offend you since you are married to a black man.

Cite please? I don't think that leagle ever told you to censor what you said.

No, it started out about you and that is why I was the target of censorship.

THe only censorship of your point of view that I'm aware of is the censorship by a number of individuals who figured out pretty quickly that you (and your growing sock drawer) have nothing worthwhile to contribute and therefore have you on ignore. The fact that you are still here contradicts your censorship claims.

So according to you, if I bring up a sensitive racial topic and don't adhere to the PC party line (i.e., black men who marry white women do it only out of love) then I am race baiting? Reeeediculous.

Grow the fuck up idiot. My opinion is not rare, it is just rarely spoken because of the screams of racism that emanate from people like you and Tush Munch.

You seem to have a problem with debate before you start with the name-calling. The problem that most people on the board had with your Tiger argument is that you have no fucking idea why he is with his fiancee. Maybe he is crazy superficial and he takes pride in being with one of the most beautiful women in the world. Maybe he is madly in love with her and they have a lot of views/beliefs in common. Maybe she is a crazy freak in bed and he is whipped by her sex play. Maybe she is brilliant and he feels smarter just being in her company and they have long deep conversations. And maybe he is filled with self-loathing and therefore he is with the super-whitest person he has ever met. The thing is you don't know. I don't know. But you state your opinion as fact. It isn't.

Go ahead, call me a name or two too instead of actually responding with a reasoned argument. I'm used to it.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Cite please? I don't think that leagle ever told you to censor what you said.

Search it yourself. Leagle claimed it was a problem with form, but it clearly was the content she didn't like. She can say it wasn't all she wants but that doesn't change the fact that it was the content she didn't like and was trying to intimidate me about.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
You seem to have a problem with debate before you start with the name-calling.

You have got to be kidding me. This board is the flame board. Always has been and always will be. This is the tone those who showed up here way before I did set for this board. Just going with the flow.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
The problem that most peole on the board had with your Tiger argument is that you have no fucking idea why he is with his fiancee.

What the fuck does that have to do with the price of tea in China? You can say the same thing about what any of you say about any celebrities choices in mates, clothing, movies to make, etc. Yet it doesn't stop you from commenting/speculating/opining.

This is the kind of bullshit I am talking about. You don't like the content of what I said but instead of admitting that, you claim some other basis for your attempt to censor me.

Coward.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
But you state your opinion as fact. It isn't.

This is an idiotic comment. Are you too fucking retarded to figure out what is an opinion and what is a fact without someone prefacing their comments with IMO? People state opinions all the time on this board without prefacing something with "IMO". When you say that Britney's dress is ugly, is that not an opinion simply because you stated it like that?

Just more hypocrisy.

[str8outavannuys]

Originally posted by Not Me
Search it yourself. Leagle claimed it was a problem with form, but it clearly was the content she didn't like. She can say it wasn't all she wants but that doesn't change the fact that it was the content she didn't like and was trying to intimidate me about.

You have got to be kidding me. This board is the flame board. Always has been and always will be. This is the tone those who showed up here way before I did set for this board. Just going with the flow.

What the fuck does that have to do with the price of tea in China? You can say the same thing about what any of you say about any celebrities choices in mates, clothing, movies to make, etc. Yet it doesn't stop you from commenting/speculating/opining.

This is the kind of bullshit I am talking about. You don't like the content of what I said but instead of admitting that, you claim some other basis for your attempt to censor me.

Coward.

This is an idiotic comment. Are you too fucking retarded to figure out what is an opinion and what is a fact without someone prefacing their comments with IMO? People state opinions all the time on this board without prefacing something with "IMO". When you say that Britney's dress is ugly, is that not an opinion simply because you stated it like that?

Just more hypocrisy.

I wasn't going to do this here, but in an effort to steer some of the hate towards me, let me just say that:

I have Sting/Annie Lennox tickets for Boston June 28, Pittsburgh July 10, and St. Louis July 24. Very good seats, face value (for my friends here, otherwise it's off to eBay I go).

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Me
Search it yourself. Leagle claimed it was a problem with form, but it clearly was the content she didn't like. She can say it wasn't all she wants but that doesn't change the fact that it was the content she didn't like and was trying to intimidate me about.

you are the one asserting it. you find it.

You have got to be kidding me. This board is the flame board. Always has been and always will be. This is the tone those who showed up here way before I did set for this board. Just going with the flow.

if you don't understand the difference between the general dialog on this board and the dialog when you are participating, I will not attempt to enlighten you. there is a difference though.

What the fuck does that have to do with the price of tea in China? You can say the same thing about what any of you say about any celebrities choices in mates, clothing, movies to make, etc. Yet it doesn't stop you from commenting/speculating/opining.

Well I don't opine as to why people choose to be in relationships with one another. It is a major sore spot with me when people do that because I've been on the other end of those judgments sometimes. your inability to admit that just possibly there are reasons for Tiger's decisions besides your narrow view is asnine. and it makes any concept of reasoned debate impossible. do you know Tiger?

This is the kind of bullshit I am talking about. You don't like the content of what I said but instead of admitting that, you claim some other basis for your attempt to censor me.

I'm not censoring you. don't ever imply that I am.

Coward.

1

This is an idiotic comment. Are you too fucking retarded to figure out what is an opinion and what is a fact without someone prefacing their comments with IMO?

2

People state opinions all the time on this board without prefacing something with "IMO". When you say that Britney's dress is ugly, is that not an opinion simply because you stated it like that?

Just more hypocrisy.

ugly dress is substantially different judgment call than fucked up relationship. but you choose not to understand the difference there. I'm done with you.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
you are the one asserting it. you find it.

But I know what was said and have no need to refresh my memory. If you want to know more, search yourself. I remember what was said.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
if you don't understand the difference between the general dialog on this board and the dialog when you are participating, I will not attempt to enlighten you. there is a difference though.

Right 'cuz no one ever gets acrimonious on this board unless I am posting.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Well I don't opine as to why people choose to be in relationships with one another. It is a major sore spot with me when people do that because I've been on the other end of those judgments sometimes.

So what and grow up. That is pure unadulterated poppycock that people don't speculate about why people choose to be in relationships on this board. Again, you just didn't like what I had to say.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
do you know Tiger?

Do you know Brad and Jen? Jen and Ben? Calista and Harrison? Etc, and so on. That hasn't stopped anyone here from commenting.

You are silly.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I'm not censoring you. don't ever imply that I am.

Yes, you and the others are trying to censor me by screaming racism every time I say something less than flattering about a black person.

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
ugly dress is substantially different judgment call than fucked up relationship.

Again, so what? People talk about fucked up relationships on this board all the time.

Sorry you have had fucked up relationships and been the subject of gossip. Grow up.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Not Me
But I know what was said and have no need to refresh my memory. If you want to know more, search yourself. I remember what was said.

Claim without supporting evidence. dismissed.

Do you know Brad and Jen? Jen and Ben? Calista and Harrison? Etc, and so on. That hasn't stopped anyone here from commenting.

cite please? find where I have ever commented on their relationships. you want to generalize to the whole board when talking to me? well I am not the whole board and, guess what, I get to have my own opinions on things. I think it is ridiculous to comment on people's relationships. I'm allowed to call people out who do so. Or I have the right to write off what you say as idiocy. Deal with it.

You are silly.

sure I am, but unfortunately your personality prevents me from displaying my silly side when dealing with you. I guess I should count this in the name-calling tally, but for you it is quite civil.

Yes, you and the others are trying to censor me by screaming racism every time I say something less than flattering about a black person.

cite please. find one single instance of me calling you a racist.

Grow up.

thanks for the wonderful advice. I'll work on that.

Here's a little advice for you: if you want to have intelligent debates with people here, treat them with some modicum of respect. actually that would probably be a good life-lesson for you too if you behave anything like your persona here IRL.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Not Me
Search it yourself. Leagle claimed it was a problem with form, but it clearly was the content she didn't like. She can say it wasn't all she wants but that doesn't change the fact that it was the content she didn't like and was trying to intimidate me about.

So intimidating.

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...0647#post50647

(is anyone still following this?)

[Not Me]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
if you want to have intelligent debates with people here, treat them with some modicum of respect.

I don't respect many of the posters here and I treat them accordingly. Those I have respect for, I treat with respect.

Respect must be earned and you haven't earned it.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
So intimidating.

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...0647#post50647

(is anyone still following this?)

Get over me snake boy.

[Chuck Barris]

Originally posted by Not Me
I don't respect many of the posters here and I treat them accordingly. Those I have respect for, I treat with respect.

Respect must be earned and you haven't earned it.

Gong.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive Maybe she is brilliant and he feels smarter just being in her company and they have long deep conversations.

guys don't care about that

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
guys don't care about that

You are definitely not my sock.