New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
And you don't see the inconsistency with that and your claim that women should show off their breasts because what's the big deal?

Are you mad? You see no difference in shockingness between the act of merely exposing a breast versus masturbating onself to ejaculation?

Lemme make it simple for you. If you show a boob in a movie, you get an R rating. If you show masturbation and climax, you get an X. That, I assume, should clear up all debate on this issue.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Are you mad? You see no difference in shockingness between the act of merely exposing a breast versus masturbating onself to ejaculation?

I agree the two are different. But you based in it personal embarassment, not shock to others. So if you want to change your original claim, that's fine, but don't make me argue against a proposition different from the one you first offered.

So, on what principled basis can you claim a woman should be less embarassed by publicly exposing her breasts than you would be by jerking off?

And "because I'd like to see her jugs" is not a principled response.

[SlaveNoMore]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Nice work. This one is my favorite.



TM

As good as that one was, I still prefer this one:

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Lemme make it simple for you. If you show a boob in a movie, you get an R rating. If you show masturbation and climax, you get an X. That, I assume, should clear up all debate on this issue.

Oh, so the MPAA rating system of a puritanical country that needs to get over its issues should determine the measure of what is more risque? That is your argument?


Dude. It isn't that I disagree with your point in general, but when one second you are insisting how crazy a country is when it comes to sex and nudity and the next you are insisting the basis for what is more extreme can be determined by rating systems in that country, (a rating system by the way that is frequently full of shit when it comes to male nudity versus female nudity) that is pretty damn fucked up.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Knock it off. I have slept neither with your wife nor your mother

Precisely.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
As good as that one was, I still prefer this one:

What the hell are those?
That's not a naughty school girl. Is it?
And what's the blue one?
St. Pauli girl without the braids? And the beer?

[John Bayesdow Disciple]

Originally posted by spookyfish
Usually the hookups are with "working girls".

Well, at least someone is working.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
So, on what principled basis can you claim a woman should be less embarassed by publicly exposing her breasts than you would be by jerking off?

well, other than for 1 mil on TV, publicly beating off gets you arrested on a morals charge as a sex offender, which then puts you in a bad spot in prison. showing one's breast in public can get you cheers at Nascar or a rich husband if done at the right time.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
And what's the blue one?
St. Pauli girl without the braids? And the beer?

Clearly, you're not in Kansas anymore.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
What the hell are those?
That's not a naughty school girl. Is it?
And what's the blue one?
St. Pauli girl without the braids? And the beer?

based on the stuffed lamb, I'm going with Little Bo Peep. Although if I had any idea what Mary (of the song) looked like, that might be a good guess too. One of those giant sheepherder staffs (?) might help out in the costume guessing on that one.

[spookyfish]

Originally posted by John Bayesdow Disciple
Well, at least someone is working.

That's pretty funny from someone who has over three times the number of posts that I have.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I agree the two are different. But you based in it personal embarassment, not shock to others. So if you want to change your original claim, that's fine, but don't make me argue against a proposition different from the one you first offered.

So, on what principled basis can you claim a woman should be less embarassed by publicly exposing her breasts than you would be by jerking off?

And "because I'd like to see her jugs" is not a principled response.

Take a poll. Ask 10 women how many would rather expose their breats or masturbate in public. I can assure you its much more embarrassing to masturbate publicly than to show a nipple.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by leagleaze
Oh, so the MPAA rating system of a puritanical country that needs to get over its issues should determine the measure of what is more risque? That is your argument?


Dude. It isn't that I disagree with your point in general, but when one second you are insisting how crazy a country is when it comes to sex and nudity and the next you are insisting the basis for what is more extreme can be determined by rating systems in that country, (a rating system by the way that is frequently full of shit when it comes to male nudity versus female nudity) that is pretty damn fucked up.

I knew I'd get that shoved up my ass... I only used it as an example of how the two behaviors are different. You're right - its a bad meausring stick or analogy, but Burger seemed impurvious to the obvious distinction I was making. I assume reasonable minds see the difference and can only conclude he was fucking with me.

[John Bayesdow Disciple]

Originally posted by spookyfish
That's pretty funny from someone who has over three times the number of posts that I have.

Um, you don't get it. But thanks for playing.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
based on the stuffed lamb, I'm going with Little Bo Peep. Although if I had any idea what Mary (of the song) looked like, that might be a good guess too. One of those giant sheepherder staffs (?) might help out in the costume guessing on that one.

oh. That's a lamb. I thought it was a bunny or bear, I guess I didn't really look all that close.
Sheepherder staff, or rabid shephard dog would probably have helped on that.