New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Wow, I'm sure it is really difficult to take pictures of someone you live with. Pick up a disposable camera and take some damn pictures. If you think she'll object, I'm sure you can surprise her at least a couple times.

You think I have photos of my wife's tits in the office? Do you have photos of your SO's cock in your wallet? Are you advocating that I take voyeur shots of my wife if she objects to having her tits on the net? Sexay.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Frankly, $200K to see his dick for 30 seconds, as long as that is (the time period, not his dick), is way too much, because the the demand to see his dick simply isn't that high. Halle can command a much higher price, because people like TM paid money to see a crappy film like Swordfish just to see her tits. And she has a hell of a lot more to lose by flashing her tits to the world in a crappy movie like Swordfish than SD does by taking a dare for whatever his market price would be. My guess is that SD's dick on TV for 30 seconds is worth no more than $25K, if that. I know models in art classes that get paid $11 an hour.

The hypo assumed the demand, but I completely agree with you. Well, $25k is high.

[Bad_Rich_Chic]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
So Halle at $500k (albeit not tax free) apparently is more embarassed by her breasts than you by your body.

Things that make you go hmmm.

Halle has a long-term financial interest in the public display of her body (including her breasts) and her image (both her literal image and her "public persona" image). Sebby just doesn't. So it makes sense that, given the investment she's made in her image and her expectations of future gain from it, that she would show rather more concern for how her image is used and expect rather greater payback for possible damage to her long-term marketing prospects. Sebby whipping his dick out on pay per view is just not going to cause legions of future employers to say "oh, he's not a serious professional, he's just a hottie with nice wobbly bits." (Not least because, compared to Halle, almost no one in the wide world cares what Sebby does, so few will notice and none of them will be able to remember his name 3 months later.)

Or, short version: Embarassment doesn't enter into it. She should charge more, because she has something to lose. Sebby doesn't.

BR(nothing valuable, at least)C

edited to add: yeah, what RT said.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by John Bayesdow Disciple
I love (love!) the fact that you are so belligerent on SD's pro nudie views, but cannot understand why someone would take offense at a fur coat. You even use the tired old excuse that minks are mean animals (without examining the cause-effect reality of whether spending life isolated in a tiny cage on death row might cause this meanness). You are just as quick to jump to poorly thought out emotional conclusions that suit your own selfish interests as he. And without the humor I might add.

As much as I hate PJ, why don't you just post under your primary -- monty, new jersey, maine, bil mo, hank, whatever other annoying fucking sock you decide to pull out of your ass while you sit at home jerking off to your own posts -- sock?

TM

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You think I have photos of my wife's tits in the office? Do you have photos of your SO's cock in your wallet? Are you advocating that I take voyeur shots of my wife if she objects to having her tits on the net? Sexay.

Even if you had a full-length spreadeagle shot of her in your wallet, it would not help you post it, so I don't see what the relevance of having photographs of nude sex partners in one's wallet is. Also, as previously discussed as a general matter I don't find male genitals aesthetically pleasing. I believe in the murky past I once said something like "I wouldn't put it up on the mantel as a decoration" but that might have been Sidd. And I am shocked, SHOCKED that you would marry someone whose attitudes about nudity are so parchial. Whatever parchial is.

And $25k is way overpricing. I'd think one of the few places you could keep a penis on screen for a 30-second stretch would be some kind of porn channel, and he'd need to do more than display his penis to get paid much of anything, let alone into 5 figures.

[tmdiva]

I need ideas for the SFC, preferably easy to put together (loved the walk of shame idea, btw, gwinky). He's on the larger side, thinning blond hair, thick red beard, blond curly fur from chin to bottom of ribcage. Something current and clever would be ideal. I've been racking my brain but nothing has sprung to mind.

tm

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Frankly, $200K to see his dick for 30 seconds, as long as that is (the time period, not his dick), is way too much, because the the demand to see his dick simply isn't that high. Halle can command a much higher price, because people like TM paid money to see a crappy film like Swordfish just to see her tits. And she has a hell of a lot more to lose by flashing her tits to the world in a crappy movie like Swordfish than SD does by taking a dare for whatever his market price would be. My guess is that SD's dick on TV for 30 seconds is worth no more than $25K, if that. I know models in art classes that get paid $11 an hour.

I have a buddy who pulls his dick out for free and does dick-tricks with it. At bars. All the time. I've seen him do it in front of hundreds of people. Guys and girls. Oddly enough, most of the girls are always intrigued instead of appalled. As in "how does he do that? Do they all do that?" Most of the time she's referring to "The Hamburger". After having seen said buddy do this for years, the GF and I watched Puppetry of the Penis on PPV (we have a descrambler and get all the PPV for free - all those porn channels Leagl was talking about and well, we ran across Puppetry of the Penis). I recognized half of the tricks.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That's why they call it the money shot in porn. I'd ask for a provision granting bonuses for distance and volume as well.

S(and a sneaker deal on the side)D

Looks like Nike has finally found an effective marketing tool for its pump models.

[ABBAKiss]

Hubby turns 30 tomorrow. Already bought (and he has already used) expensive dive camera. Need a smaller gift to present on birthday itself. Any ideas? About $100 or less.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Even if you had a full-length spreadeagle shot of her in your wallet, it would not help you post it, so I don't see what the relevance of having photographs of nude sex partners in one's wallet is. Also, as previously discussed as a general matter I don't find male genitals aesthetically pleasing. I believe in the murky past I once said something like "I wouldn't put it up on the mantel as a decoration" but that might have been Sidd. And I am shocked, SHOCKED that you would marry someone whose attitudes about nudity are so parchial. Whatever parchial is.

And $25k is way overpricing. I'd think one of the few places you could keep a penis on screen for a 30-second stretch would be some kind of porn channel, and he'd need to do more than display his penis to get paid much of anything, let alone into 5 figures.

1. If I had the photo, I could post it. Of course, I'd be risking my career by hijacking the scanner for such prurient purposes...

2. My wife's views on nudity are not at all parochial, Timothy. I merely noted that she'd probably not be thrilled that I was taking "action shots" of her walking about the home nude. I can sympathize because I'd prefer to be fluffed before such a shoot, rather than shot on the sly. I need proper make up.

3. I can do both "cabbage" and "the flying squirrel."

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
1. If I had the photo, I could post it. Of course, I'd be risking my career by hijacking the scanner for such prurient purposes...

2. My wife's views on nudity are not at all parochial, Timothy. I merely noted that she'd probably not be thrilled that I was taking "action shots" of her walking about the home nude. I can sympathize because I'd prefer to be fluffed before such a shoot, rather than shot on the sly. I need proper make up.

If you got the disposable camera, you could get it developed onto a CD and then email the picture to someone to post. The cropping function would also be helpful in the event you got too much of her by accident. But see below.

2. I didn't say you had to take the pictures on the sly -- you could do any kind of glamor shot you like.

Just post the fucking picture.

[SlaveNoMore]

sebastian_dangerfield
You think I have photos of my wife's tits in the office?

Why the hell not. We all do.

s4(and they is niiiiiiiiice)e

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
assume she said no-
the producer wouldn't let her talk and her people wouldn't want her to either. the producer is afraid the public would think what is wrong with the movie that he had to try and pay 500K to show tits. see the possibility of it, not realized hurts boxoffice. plus I never met a producer who wasn't an egotistic bastard. these guys would never allow a story of something they failed to pull off go public.

See Gigli. Also see all those movies where you hear about who the lead actor was supposed to be even though said producer couldn't get them.

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Halle wouldn't want it out either because it makes her seem prudish perhaps, although maybe not so much when Monster's comes out.

Right. Because Julia Roberts career sure took a nose dive because she hasn't shown her tits.

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
And the tits coming out in M.B. don't give her nearly the buzz that the Swordfish tits do.

Right. It gives her Oscar buzz, which did more for her career than Swordfish could. But whatever.

TM

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by tmdiva
I need ideas for the SFC, preferably easy to put together (loved the walk of shame idea, btw, gwinky). He's on the larger side, thinning blond hair, thick red beard, blond curly fur from chin to bottom of ribcage. Something current and clever would be ideal. I've been racking my brain but nothing has sprung to mind.

tm

Lumberjack would be very easy.
Axe, flannel shirt, done.

Or, axe murderer - same clothing - more blood.

My favorite, for guys with beards is the half man half woman. He has to shave half the beard, but the effect and attention will be totally worth it.

Or hand him a Wilson volleyball and he can be "survivor."

[Bad_Rich_Chic]

Originally posted by tmdiva
I need ideas for the SFC, preferably easy to put together (loved the walk of shame idea, btw, gwinky). He's on the larger side, thinning blond hair, thick red beard, blond curly fur from chin to bottom of ribcage. Something current and clever would be ideal. I've been racking my brain but nothing has sprung to mind.

tm

Er, viking? Sounds like a viking to me, particularly with the red beard and all. You could pretty much go with nothing but a horned helmet over a bulky sweater and neutral trousers, really, but by all means add an axe and/or a fake fur tunic if you feel the urge.

BR(I am presuming, perhaps unwisely, that "the SFC" is an adult male human. I can't keep track of the acronyms anymore)C