LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 313
1 members and 312 guests
Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2005, 09:20 PM   #4756
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Balance calories in with calories out

Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Cunning.
That would be Less eating me, not vice versa.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:23 PM   #4757
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
Balance calories in with calories out

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
That would be Less eating me, not vice versa.
does the report suggest mid-workout snacking?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:28 PM   #4758
Spank Myasski
Registered User
 
Spank Myasski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Drunk off my ass
Posts: 49
I'm as vapid as anyone

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Of course I'm obsessed with you. There are only 2 posters more vapid than me, and Taxwonk runs hot and cold as to volume.
I'm wounded.
__________________
I just can't get it right
Spank Myasski is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:29 PM   #4759
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Balance calories in with calories out

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
does the report suggest mid-workout snacking?
I think drinking is more important.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:36 PM   #4760
notcasesensitive
Flaired.
 
notcasesensitive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
Serious Question

I had one of those Seinfeldian moments earlier today where I put some money in a vending machine and my chosen snack didn't fall out of its row to be picked up by me from the bottom, as anticipated. I tried the hitting, jostling, etc., but to no avail, so I returned to my office, took out some more change and headed back to the machine. End result: two candy bars instead of one. Now I already feel bad enough about having resorted to buying a candy bar out of the vending machine in the first place, but the knowledge that I have a second candy bar just sitting there inside of my desk is literally killing me. So should I bust it open and eat it too and just get all of the badness over in one day or should I hold off and eat it tomorrow? I mean once I've wrecked the day, seems like I should really wreck it and work on making tomorrow a candy-free one. Right?

[Ps. I realize I'm not making much sense, but you must understand. There is a candy bar in my desk. Just sitting there. Wait. I think it just said something to me.]
notcasesensitive is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:41 PM   #4761
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Serious Question

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I had one of those Seinfeldian moments earlier today where I put some money in a vending machine and my chosen snack didn't fall out of its row to be picked up by me from the bottom, as anticipated. I tried the hitting, jostling, etc., but to no avail, so I returned to my office, took out some more change and headed back to the machine. End result: two candy bars instead of one. Now I already feel bad enough about having resorted to buying a candy bar out of the vending machine in the first place, but the knowledge that I have a second candy bar just sitting there inside of my desk is literally killing me. So should I bust it open and eat it too and just get all of the badness over in one day or should I hold off and eat it tomorrow? I mean once I've wrecked the day, seems like I should really wreck it and work on making tomorrow a candy-free one. Right?

[Ps. I realize I'm not making much sense, but you must understand. There is a candy bar in my desk. Just sitting there. Wait. I think it just said something to me.]
Duh, send the extra candy bar over to me.

Though, the confused nonsense of your post may indicate that you are suffering from low blood sugar -- so maybe you should just suck that yummy bar down.

Mmmmm, candy.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:41 PM   #4762
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Serious Question

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I had one of those Seinfeldian moments earlier today where I put some money in a vending machine and my chosen snack didn't fall out of its row to be picked up by me from the bottom, as anticipated. I tried the hitting, jostling, etc., but to no avail, so I returned to my office, took out some more change and headed back to the machine. End result: two candy bars instead of one. Now I already feel bad enough about having resorted to buying a candy bar out of the vending machine in the first place, but the knowledge that I have a second candy bar just sitting there inside of my desk is literally killing me. So should I bust it open and eat it too and just get all of the badness over in one day or should I hold off and eat it tomorrow? I mean once I've wrecked the day, seems like I should really wreck it and work on making tomorrow a candy-free one. Right?

[Ps. I realize I'm not making much sense, but you must understand. There is a candy bar in my desk. Just sitting there. Wait. I think it just said something to me.]
I just ate my second. It's getting late. Desparate times.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 09:51 PM   #4763
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
Paigow seen in Palo Alto?

Unrelatedly, a speaker told Palo Alto middle-school students that you earn a tremendous amount of money as an exotic dancer.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is online now  
Old 01-13-2005, 10:42 PM   #4764
Whack Mybuttski
I'm right behind you!
 
Whack Mybuttski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: arse over tit
Posts: 22
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by Spank Myasski
I'm wounded.
Whiff.
__________________
I just can't get enough.....

Last edited by Whack Mybuttski; 01-13-2005 at 10:45 PM..
Whack Mybuttski is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 10:50 PM   #4765
Spank Myasski
Registered User
 
Spank Myasski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Drunk off my ass
Posts: 49
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by Whack Mybuttski
Whiff.
You had to edit a one word post?
__________________
I just can't get it right
Spank Myasski is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 10:51 PM   #4766
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by Spank Myasski
You had to edit a one word post?
Y'all remind me of that Multiplicity movie with Michael Keaton.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 10:55 PM   #4767
Whack Mybuttski
I'm right behind you!
 
Whack Mybuttski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: arse over tit
Posts: 22
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by Spank Myasski
You had to edit a one word post?
I just can't get it right, know what I mean?
__________________
I just can't get enough.....
Whack Mybuttski is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:04 PM   #4768
notcasesensitive
Flaired.
 
notcasesensitive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Y'all remind me of that Multiplicity movie with Michael Keaton.
Was he really irritating in that one?
notcasesensitive is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:13 PM   #4769
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Was he really irritating in that one?
Um, it's more a sheer stupidity thing. But I'm pretty undiscriminating when it comes to movies etc.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:17 PM   #4770
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
No, I am

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Um, it's more a sheer stupidity thing. But I'm pretty undiscriminating when it comes to movies etc.
point of order- you found the original MK character was ok- it was the clones that were stupid- right?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.