LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 474
0 members and 474 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2021, 10:02 AM   #4846
Icky Thump
Registered User
 
Icky Thump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,565
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone View Post
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”
No, sorry, I generally use that language to refer to my coworkers, plaintiffs' lawyers.

ETA, decent strategy for a jury though.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol

Last edited by Icky Thump; 05-19-2021 at 10:06 AM..
Icky Thump is offline  
Old 05-19-2021, 10:31 AM   #4847
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone View Post
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”
This is from a guy defending some insurrectionists?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:01 AM   #4848
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone View Post
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”
Dude's not wrong.
Adder is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 11:21 AM   #4849
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone View Post
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”
In this interview, which might qualify as some of the bleakest dark comedy ever, Watkins doubles down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocP_5OS0rc0&t=4s
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 12:51 PM   #4850
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
In this interview, which might qualify as some of the bleakest dark comedy ever, Watkins doubles down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocP_5OS0rc0&t=4s
This is great, but it begs the question, is this post hoc rationalization for the original rant?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 05-21-2021, 01:26 PM   #4851
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
This is great, but it begs the question, is this post hoc rationalization for the original rant?
Which of us was the grammar pedant?
Adder is offline  
Old 05-21-2021, 07:53 PM   #4852
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Which of us was the grammar pedant?
1) I made a grammar error?

2) I have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when I would post to correct DTB or Ty or flower's grammar it is funny because I clearly have no room to criticize. Note, I would never criticize your grammar.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 05-22-2021, 08:33 PM   #4853
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
1) I made a grammar error?

2) I have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when I would post to correct DTB or Ty or flower's grammar it is funny because I clearly have no room to criticize. Note, I would never criticize your grammar.
Dude, I’m the worst at grammar and usage and it’s not a contest.

In unrelated news, got a haircut for the first time since the pandemic and why don’t I have an attractive young lady rub my head at length more often?
Adder is offline  
Old 05-22-2021, 10:26 PM   #4854
LessinSF
Wearing the cranky pants
 
LessinSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Dude, I’m the worst at grammar and usage and it’s not a contest.

In unrelated news, got a haircut for the first time since the pandemic and why don’t I have an attractive young lady rub my head at length more often?
Dude, just too easy.
__________________
Boogers!
LessinSF is offline  
Old 05-23-2021, 06:50 AM   #4855
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hank chinaski View Post
1) i made a grammar error?

2) i have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when i would post to correct dtb or ty or flower's grammar it is funny because i clearly have no room to criticize. Note, i would never criticize your grammar.
i'm number one!!! I'm number one!!!
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
Old 05-29-2021, 09:32 PM   #4856
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.
Adder is offline  
Old 05-31-2021, 07:02 AM   #4857
Icky Thump
Registered User
 
Icky Thump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,565
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.
Some good slogans for that R camp:

"Make America A Laughing Stock Again."
"From Worst to First to Worst Again"
"What has Joe done in 4 months other than return America to being a world leader?"
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
Icky Thump is offline  
Old 06-01-2021, 04:10 PM   #4858
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
Re: Objectively intelligent.



Pretty funny, actually.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 06-01-2021, 05:27 PM   #4859
pony_trekker
Livin' a Lie!
 
pony_trekker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,097
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post


Pretty funny, actually.
Make sure to turn on your own every chance you get to show you’re being fair.
__________________
C'mon Pookie, let's burn this motherfucker down.
pony_trekker is offline  
Old 06-03-2021, 08:01 PM   #4860
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.
1. I'm nuts busy.
2. I reply to every moron who claims that Biden didn't win with "Math."
3. The reply makes me happy because it alienates me from people I'd prefer to avoid. See #1.
4. You're still such a tool. Didn't Covid have any impact?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.