LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 336
0 members and 336 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2005, 06:55 PM   #4876
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
RT

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Nah, I'm a fake tit snob. A bad boob job is like bad hair. It's the wearer's own goddamned fault, and they ought to be ridiculed for being such jackasses.

When you see the surgeon, you should know better than to ask for the Pam Anderson Special.

A pair of massive bulbous orbs stuffed onto a chick should be a ridicule antenna.

But a well done pair like Brooke Burke's or Gisele's... that should be celebrated. Artwork and such...
Whatever. Heidi's aren't real, and you were celebrating them for being real and perfect.

eta on an unrelated note, it fucking smells like fucking cigarette smoke in my fucking office. HOW CAN THAT BE? This is insult on top of the injury that someone has been smoking outside my house and the smell comes in. Ick. I feel faintly nauseated all the fucking time. Fucking fuckwaddy motherfucking fucktards.
ltl/fb is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 06:56 PM   #4877
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
You have to be kidding. It's rude to comment on a person's body in his or her presence, regardless of whether they've had work done or not. Some women might reasonably be offended without being considered "persnickety." Even women who don't wear panties.

You don't really believe that the mere fact that a woman has had work means that she has given the world license to address her about it, directly, or even worse, indirectly?

Referring to a woman's tits as fake in her presence is incredibly fucking rude, even if there are women in the world who would not be offended. Not everybody is Jenna Jameson, for god's sake.
For chrissakes, I meant "nice tits" as a compliment. Lay off already.
Sidd Finch is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 06:57 PM   #4878
paigowprincess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
You have to be kidding. It's rude to comment on a person's body in his or her presence, regardless of whether they've had work done or not. Some women might reasonably be offended without being considered "persnickety." Even women who don't wear panties.

You don't really believe that the mere fact that a woman has had work means that she has given the world license to address her about it, directly, or even worse, indirectly?

Referring to a woman's tits as fake in her presence is incredibly fucking rude, even if there are women in the world who would not be offended. Not everybody is Jenna Jameson, for god's sake.
Why don't you go back and read my hypo, robusttimmy? I never said talking about HER fake tits in front of her. Just fake tits in general.
 
Old 02-16-2005, 06:59 PM   #4879
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Why don't you go back and read my hypo, robusttimmy? I never said talking about HER fake tits in front of her. Just fake tits in general.
As if re-reading it would help.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:01 PM   #4880
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
You have to be kidding. It's rude to comment on a person's body in his or her presence, regardless of whether they've had work done or not. Some women might reasonably be offended without being considered "persnickety." Even women who don't wear panties.

You don't really believe that the mere fact that a woman has had work means that she has given the world license to address her about it, directly, or even worse, indirectly?

Referring to a woman's tits as fake in her presence is incredibly fucking rude, even if there are women in the world who would not be offended. Not everybody is Jenna Jameson, for god's sake.
You buy fake tits, you're looking to show those babies off. You aren't going to be too offended if someone casually says "Nice goddamned work, Puppy." Its all in the delivery.

I assure you, if some hot guy comes up to you and says "You look great in that dress" you aren't going to slap him. You're probably going to find a way to let him into your twisted panties. "You look great in that dress" translates to "Your tits and ass look fantastic right now." Every time a man has said that to you and you've said "Thank you" in return, you've effectively thanked him for complimenting your T&A.

Semantics. We'd all do better without so many words. Making "Hello, would you like to have a few more drinks, then fuck?" acceptable would have made life so much easier.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:03 PM   #4881
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
You have to be kidding. It's rude to comment on a person's body in his or her presence, regardless of whether they've had work done or not. Some women might reasonably be offended without being considered "persnickety." Even women who don't wear panties.

You don't really believe that the mere fact that a woman has had work means that she has given the world license to address her about it, directly, or even worse, indirectly?

Referring to a woman's tits as fake in her presence is incredibly fucking rude, even if there are women in the world who would not be offended. Not everybody is Jenna Jameson, for god's sake.
Is it okay if the woman has a gummed up cranium?
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:03 PM   #4882
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
Not Bob Loves The Bluejackets

Quote:
Not Bob
Oh, and slave, fuck Goodenow because if you're going to cave for a cap of $49 million, you might as well take a cap of $42 million to save the season.
The owner's are giving up nothing. Nothing.

Player's conceded a permanent 24% rollback which many will never recoup due to an implemented cap.

The cap proposed by the owner's is much lower than the cap level (per revenues, which we know are cooked) for the NFL.

Atlanta may be fun to watch - but who is watching? The NHL forced franchises in cities that cannot/won't sustain them. This should be a 18 team league at most.

And to fuck up even more fan loyalty - the owner's proposed a player swap system to dismantle some of the higher end teams (see Leafs, Wings) and send some players to the lower end teams (...your Blue Jackets new center, Steve Yzerman)

Also - not all owners are to blame. Leafs and Rangers would have met in the middle a long time ago. This is all about Bettman trying to save his ass with those shitty new teams.
SlaveNoMore is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:04 PM   #4883
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You buy fake tits, you're looking to show those babies off. You aren't going to be too offended if someone casually says "Nice goddamned work, Puppy." Its all in the delivery.

I assure you, if some hot guy comes up to you and says "You look great in that dress" you aren't going to slap him. You're probably going to find a way to let him into your twisted panties. "You look great in that dress" translates to "Your tits and ass look fantastic right now." Every time a man has said that to you and you've said "Thank you" in return, you've effectively thanked him for complimenting your T&A.

Semantics. We'd all do better without so many words. Making "Hello, would you like to have a few more drinks, then fuck?" acceptable would have made life so much easier.
Darling, semantics is part of the difference between rude and polite. "You look great in that dress" is polite. "Your tits look so great I think they must be fake" is rude. You call it simple, I call it crass.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:06 PM   #4884
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
I went home with the waitress (the way I always do).

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I assure you, if some hot guy comes up to you and says "You look great in that dress" you aren't going to slap him. You're probably going to find a way to let him into your twisted panties. "You look great in that dress" translates to "Your tits and ass look fantastic right now." Every time a man has said that to you and you've said "Thank you" in return, you've effectively thanked him for complimenting your T&A.
Thank you, sebby, for validating Mrs. Not Bob's view on male/female interpersonal relationships.

And TM wonders why I obsess over all possible reactions to "hey, your new hairstyle looks nice."
Not Bob is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:07 PM   #4885
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Is it okay if the woman has a gummed up cranium?
Which woman? The one with the nice fakes, or the one with the bad fakes? And does the woman everyone is talking about have good ones or bad ones? What about the other fake titter, who's in the group where they're all talking about the other woman? Are her fakes good or bad?

This hypo is gumming up MY cranium.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:09 PM   #4886
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
wahh!!!!!!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Montoya would have played for the Hartford Wolfpack. Not so bad. really.
Are you a buckeye?
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:14 PM   #4887
paigowprincess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Darling, semantics is part of the difference between rude and polite. "You look great in that dress" is polite. "Your tits look so great I think they must be fake" is rude. You call it simple, I call it crass.
I think Sebby's original thesis was that Heidi's tits looked so good they had to be real bc one cannot buy teardrops. You are really struggling today.
 
Old 02-16-2005, 07:16 PM   #4888
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
I think Sebby's original thesis was that Heidi's tits looked so good they had to be real bc one cannot buy teardrops. You are really struggling today.
You are so funny.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:17 PM   #4889
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
Not Bob Loves The Bluejackets

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Atlanta may be fun to watch - but who is watching? The NHL forced franchises in cities that cannot/won't sustain them. This should be a 18 team league at most.
People will watch. Most of the new franchises are doing ok in terms of actual arena attendance -- the problem is that people (at least in the US) aren't watching *any* NHL games on TV. I could be wrong, but I don't think that there is an appreciable difference in ESPN ratings when Atlanta plays or when Detroit plays.

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Also - not all owners are to blame. Leafs and Rangers would have met in the middle a long time ago. This is all about Bettman trying to save his ass with those shitty new teams.
According to what I read somewhere, the owners have given Bettman and his cronies a veto over a labor deal -- 8 teams can block an agreement. That means the reasonable owners are stuck, although they presumably agreed to this in advance.

On your underlying point on this whole thing, I agree -- the players have gotten screwed, and Bettman should be squashed. My point was that since Goodenow capitulated and swallowed his pride in accepting a cap, the $6 million difference really didn't matter.
Not Bob is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:20 PM   #4890
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
slurs

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Darling, semantics is part of the difference between rude and polite. "You look great in that dress" is polite. "Your tits look so great I think they must be fake" is rude. You call it simple, I call it crass.
Again with the semantics. And crass is so 80s. Which I think means its cool.

I never say "You look great in that dress" except to my wife because I feel a bit skeeved saying "I'd like to fuck you" to women to whom I'm not married.

The worst is having a female friend with a kicking body walk up to you at the beach and start talking, because all you're thinking is "hmmmm, Brazilian... hmmmm, excellent nipplage... glad she got in the water."

This is whay, when the man in the sunglasses store says, "But sir, for a professional, the deeply tinted Revos look a bit too sporty... people can't even see your eyes," I say "Exactly."
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.