» Site Navigation |
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
08-17-2006, 02:17 PM
|
#691
|
Rageaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
|
Following cars.
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Erisa Rose in Spanish Harlem?
|
Bilmore?
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:21 PM
|
#692
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
It must be Snowing, Cause I Sleigh Me
Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish
Bilmore?
|
Oh come on! I'm twice the punster Bilmore ever was.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:23 PM
|
#693
|
Rageaholic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: On the margins.
Posts: 3,507
|
It must be Snowing, Cause I Sleigh Me
Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Oh come on! I'm twice the punster Bilmore ever was.
|
Well, he did Atkins, IIRC.
__________________
Some people say I need anger management. I say fuck them.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:26 PM
|
#694
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow, natch.
Posts: 2,807
|
K Fed
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
entitled K Race.
|
Is this any better?
Doing my part to move us towards #5000,
str8
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:30 PM
|
#695
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
|
K Fed
Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Is this any better?
Doing my part to move us towards #5000,
str8
|
So who thinks ppnyc spent her lunch hour shopping for something to wear to meet TM? I bet she's all aflutter.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:32 PM
|
#696
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Following cars.
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
No, I'm saying the obverse.*
* Or whatever it's called. No hot guy** would drive a boxy, 20 year-old electric blue car with white pleather.
** ETA: Hot as defined by anyone other than fringe, who would find a donut-shaped guy hot.
To wit:
|
I note that the donut guy you found is the same person as your avatar.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:32 PM
|
#697
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
K Fed
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
So who thinks ppnyc spent her lunch hour shopping for something to wear to meet TM? I bet she's all aflutter.
|
I think penske is scrambling to hire the hottest asian actress he can find on short notice. I haven't heard anything back on my pm.
TM
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:33 PM
|
#698
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rose City 'til I Die
Posts: 3,306
|
K Fed
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
So who thinks ppnyc spent her lunch hour shopping for something to wear to meet TM? I bet she's all aflutter.
|
I'm wondering if she'll suck it. Since she still hasn't filled us in on her blowjob technique, maybe Thurgreed can give us a review.
__________________
Drinking gin from a jam jar.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:35 PM
|
#699
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
My Rant
For the record, I could care less whether ppnyc is hot or not. That was never the point of any of my interactions with her. I don't care what clothes she wears, I don't care whether she is an attorney or "staff". What I care about are the really ugly views she continually espouses about other women. I don't consider myself to be a huge feminist, but her treatment of other women on this board and views about what should make women happy are offensive to me. I am offended, as a woman, by statements that only women who are married with kids could possibly be happy and everyone else is an unhappy, bitter, lonely fraud. I am offended when her counter to a woman who disagrees with her is that the woman must be ugly and not in a relationship. I wish there weren't women in the world who held the views that she claims to hold. I think that her views do a great disservice to women generally, and particularly to women who have taken the time and effort to make careers and lives for themselves that don't revolve solely around whether they have men in their life.
So, Penske, don't give me this "what an unfair pile-on to poor, innocent little ppnyc". The stuff she spews here is vile and hateful towards other women and it is perfectly reasonable for some of us to point out to her that we take offense to her entire line of thinking. No that she gives us any indication that she gets what we are saying most of the time, but at least we can try to impart the message.
In other words, I'm perfectly happy for her to be non-substantive. Not my beef at all.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:36 PM
|
#700
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
K Fed
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I think penske is scrambling to hire the hottest asian actress he can find on short notice. I haven't heard anything back on my pm.
TM
|
Do you have her on ignore? Because you have to take her off in order to get a reply.
(helpful!)
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:37 PM
|
#701
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
|
My Rant
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
For the record, I could care less whether ppnyc is hot or not. That was never the point of any of my interactions with her. I don't care what clothes she wears, I don't care whether she is an attorney or "staff". What I care about are the really ugly views she continually espouses about other women. I don't consider myself to be a huge feminist, but her treatment of other women on this board and views about what should make women happy are offensive to me. I am offended, as a woman, by statements that only women who are married with kids could possibly be happy and everyone else is an unhappy, bitter, lonely fraud. I am offended when her counter to a woman who disagrees with her is that the woman must be ugly and not in a relationship. I wish there weren't women in the world who held the views that she claims to hold. I think that her views do a great disservice to women generally, and particularly to women who have taken the time and effort to make careers and lives for themselves that don't revolve solely around whether they have men in their life.
So, Penske, don't give me this "what an unfair pile-on to poor, innocent little ppnyc". The stuff she spews here is vile and hateful towards other women and it is perfectly reasonable for some of us to point out to her that we take offense to her entire line of thinking. No that she gives us any indication that she gets what we are saying most of the time, but at least we can try to impart the message.
In other words, I'm perfectly happy for her to be non-substantive. Not my beef at all.
|
Well said.
For a bitter divorced feminist beyotch.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:41 PM
|
#702
|
No title
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 8,092
|
Where the hell is Erisa?
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
For the record, I could care less whether ppnyc is hot or not. That was never the point of any of my interactions with her. I don't care what clothes she wears, I don't care whether she is an attorney or "staff". What I care about are the really ugly views she continually espouses about other women. I don't consider myself to be a huge feminist, but her treatment of other women on this board and views about what should make women happy are offensive to me. I am offended, as a woman, by statements that only women who are married with kids could possibly be happy and everyone else is an unhappy, bitter, lonely fraud. I am offended when her counter to a woman who disagrees with her is that the woman must be ugly and not in a relationship. I wish there weren't women in the world who held the views that she claims to hold. I think that her views do a great disservice to women generally, and particularly to women who have taken the time and effort to make careers and lives for themselves that don't revolve solely around whether they have men in their life.
So, Penske, don't give me this "what an unfair pile-on to poor, innocent little ppnyc". The stuff she spews here is vile and hateful towards other women and it is perfectly reasonable for some of us to point out to her that we take offense to her entire line of thinking. No that she gives us any indication that she gets what we are saying most of the time, but at least we can try to impart the message.
In other words, I'm perfectly happy for her to be non-substantive. Not my beef at all.
|
Just to clarify, she said that having kids and a husband made her more balanced. She didn't say happy. But of course we all know that what makes you more balanced and happy is having gone to grad school. Or college.
__________________
Ritchie Incognito is a shitbag.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:41 PM
|
#703
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
|
Late and unoriginal observation
I must have missed the Emmy nominations, but I want to know what kind of voting system results in a nomination for Kevin James of King of Queens but none for Hugh Laurie, the sexiest man who's not a doctor but plays one on TV EVER?
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:41 PM
|
#704
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
My Rant
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
For the record, I could care less whether ppnyc is hot or not. That was never the point of any of my interactions with her. I don't care what clothes she wears, I don't care whether she is an attorney or "staff". What I care about are the really ugly views she continually espouses about other women. I don't consider myself to be a huge feminist, but her treatment of other women on this board and views about what should make women happy are offensive to me. I am offended, as a woman, by statements that only women who are married with kids could possibly be happy and everyone else is an unhappy, bitter, lonely fraud. I am offended when her counter to a woman who disagrees with her is that the woman must be ugly and not in a relationship. I wish there weren't women in the world who held the views that she claims to hold. I think that her views do a great disservice to women generally, and particularly to women who have taken the time and effort to make careers and lives for themselves that don't revolve solely around whether they have men in their life.
So, Penske, don't give me this "what an unfair pile-on to poor, innocent little ppnyc". The stuff she spews here is vile and hateful towards other women and it is perfectly reasonable for some of us to point out to her that we take offense to her entire line of thinking. No that she gives us any indication that she gets what we are saying most of the time, but at least we can try to impart the message.
In other words, I'm perfectly happy for her to be non-substantive. Not my beef at all.
|
I heart ncs.
|
|
|
08-17-2006, 02:42 PM
|
#705
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
My Rant
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Well said.
For a bitter divorced feminist beyotch.
|
Um, ugly? Old?
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|