Fashion Board 12-09-03 through 1-08-04 - Page 5

NotFromHere · 12-09-2003, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gov't Cheese
Do you read for content assmunch? It happened to an acquaintance of mine (hi B!). She didn't notice the string. And she's a better yoyoer than you. Dillweed.

your turn to read for content. He had the sex. You can't have the sex if there's furniture in the lobby. Unless you have a really really large gaping lobby.

bold_n_brazen · 12-09-2003, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Crack isn't more addictive. That is a lie. There are no studies that show that smoking crack is any more or less than any other type of cocaine.

Moreover unlike heroine, cocaine only produces a psychological addiction, not a physical addiction.

I call bullshit. Cite, please.

government cheese · 12-09-2003, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Crack isn't more addictive. That is a lie. There are no studies that show that smoking crack is any more or less than any other type of cocaine.

Moreover unlike heroine, cocaine only produces a psychological addiction, not a physical addiction.

If crack was legal this wouldn't be an issue. The war on drugs is a farce. Alcohol is deadly, addictive, and mind-altering but its legal while crack users and dope ssmokers are persecuted.

Its lame that the moralistic jackbloots and religious nuts in this country give hootch a free ride just because booze was legal in the bible and meanwhile an all natural crop like hemp is felonious. Many, many people can smoke marijuana or crack responsibly whether Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft like it or not.

Not Me · 12-09-2003, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
This post is extraordinarily ignorant and offensive. I obviously would have noticed the string. I used to yoyo a good deal.

Umm, I am pretty sure that the reason the tampon gets left in by mistake is because the string gets sucked inside and then the woman forgets about it. So you wouldn't see a string.

Tyrone Slothrop · 12-09-2003, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by government cheese
Many, many people can smoke marijuana or crack responsibly whether Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft like it or not.

I thought Rush liked oxycontin.

Not Me · 12-09-2003, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by government cheese
If crack was legal this wouldn't be an issue. The war on drugs is a farce. Alcohol is deadly, addictive, and mind-altering but its legal while crack users and dope ssmokers are persecuted.

Its lame that the moralistic jackbloots and religious nuts in this country give hootch a free ride just because booze was legal in the bible and meanwhile an all natural crop like hemp is felonious. Many, many people can smoke marijuana or crack responsibly whether Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft like it or not.

Yep.

bilmore · 12-09-2003, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by government cheese
. . . the moralistic jackbloots . . .

I remember these! Dr. Suess, right?

(Coming back to me now - they were the friends of the Relibious Phamatix! Ah, childhood.)

spookyfish · 12-09-2003, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I call bullshit. Cite, please.

And personal experience doesn't count. (Yet, it explains much).

Not Me · 12-09-2003, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
your turn to read for content. He had the sex. You can't have the sex if there's furniture in the lobby. Unless you have a really really large gaping lobby.

Depends on the hooch.

robustpuppy · 12-09-2003, 05:33 PM

I just had the opportunity to read the January 2004 Esquire and I want to retract an earlier statement that implied that I found the concept of sex with Jack Nicholson disgusting. I now find the concept intriguing. I am quite sure that having Jack Nicholson trying to get me to go to bed with him would be a very enjoyable experience.

And really a great start to the new thread, folks, high quality stuff. (SS, why did you stoop?)

Tyrone Slothrop · 12-09-2003, 05:35 PM

A question for the crack posters here:

Is crack cheaper because it's cheaper to make, or is it cheaper because of where and to whom it's sold? I.e., is it a supply function or a demand function?

Bilmore's addictiveness/dollar point is a good one, except that it suggests that the blow that, say, Donald Trump is buying is really lousy stuff, when in fact he's just in a different market segment.

NotFromHere · 12-09-2003, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
A question for the crack posters here:

Is crack cheaper because it's cheaper to make, or is it cheaper because of where and to whom it's sold? I.e., is it a supply function or a demand function?

Bilmore's addictiveness/dollar point is a good one, except that it suggests that the blow that, say, Donald Trump is buying is really lousy stuff, when in fact he's just in a different market segment.

It can't be cheaper to make because the main ingredient is the same, plus you have to factor in the cost of labor to manufacture.
I believe crack is cheaper because you can purchase a smaller quantity. A rock is easier to market than trying to weigh and fold thousands of little packets of blow.

Pretty Little Flower · 12-09-2003, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by government cheese
If crack was legal this wouldn't be an issue. The war on drugs is a farce. Alcohol is deadly, addictive, and mind-altering but its legal while crack users and dope ssmokers are persecuted.

Its lame that the moralistic jackbloots and religious nuts in this country give hootch a free ride just because booze was legal in the bible and meanwhile an all natural crop like hemp is felonious. Many, many people can smoke marijuana or crack responsibly whether Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft like it or not.

Suuuuuuure they can. I've seen some of those boarded up houses full of people responsibly using crack. I've seen the women in the alley giving responsible $10 blow jobs so they can score one more rock. And think of all the responsible dopers out there. Responsibly following Phish around, selling undercooked pasta at shows to other responsible dopers so they can score a bag and a ticket. Hitting the responsible age of 35 and wondering how they are going to support their responsible asses now that half their life is gone, they have no job skills, and they cannot retain information for more than about three minutes. I mean, don't get me wrong. We can always use more convenience store clerks. Just give me back the correct amount of change this time, you fucking worthless burn out.

Shape Shifter · 12-09-2003, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by government cheese
Do you read for content assmunch? It happened to an acquaintance of mine (hi B!). She didn't notice the string. And she's a better yoyoer than you. Dillweed.

Try again assrot. Your mind is mouldier than a Wisconsin warehouse, your reasoning more full of holes than that imitation Swiss shit you dole out on the 1st and 15th. I have carefully considered all the "B" possibilities on this board. The only possible candidate for your improbable canard is bilmore. But this does not work because (1) bilmore is an ostensible he, not a she, and (2) he can't yoyo for shit. Can't even Walk the Dog. Poltroon.

Not Me · 12-09-2003, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
your turn to read for content. He had the sex. You can't have the sex if there's furniture in the lobby. Unless you have a really really large gaping lobby.

BTW - you falsely attributed a quote to me in your post.