» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 382 |
0 members and 382 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
06-03-2003, 02:52 PM
|
#8041
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,277
|
Women Wearing Pants
My mom says that she and a few other women caused a minor scandal at their work in the mid to late sixties when they started wearing trousers to work. She says that it was practically unheard of at the time, though trousers were much more pratical in the labs they were working in.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 02:59 PM
|
#8042
|
She Said, Let's Go!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hollerin' for Heras
Posts: 1,781
|
Women Wearing Pants
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
My mom says that she and a few other women caused a minor scandal at their work in the mid to late sixties when they started wearing trousers to work. She says that it was practically unheard of at the time, though trousers were much more pratical in the labs they were working in.
|
Hell, it could still shock a fair number of folks in New England. But the idea that someone should have to wear a skirt and hose on a blustery 5 degree day with snow and frigid wind blowing up the works is just ludicrous.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:01 PM
|
#8043
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
convenient tropes
Quote:
Atticus Grinch
The writer might have decided (or been told) that she could republish posts, but not publish any other quotes under pseudonym. Journalistic integrity would have then dictated that there was no story worth telling, but it would explain why she spent so much time in interviews when the finished product was so horribly lopsided and easy to write.
|
When their executive editor of American Lawyer writes back to us and explains that he deems our arguments "petty and childish" - you get the impression that any article on us from them wasn't going to be impartial.
not7yS
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:03 PM
|
#8044
|
Owner of FB Post 11000!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: A galaxy far far away -- but close enough to be home by dinner!
Posts: 130
|
Mmmm.....Salty
So, is their webmaster also a born-again virgin, or is 'em just having a joke at their expense?
"Demi passionately tackled the issue of sex outside of marriage... "
While we're on the topic, what's worse:
(A) one time sluts who are now born-again virgins
(B) hideously repulsive nymphomaniacs
(C) NAMBLA Members
(C) naughty (but nice) priests or
(D) Satanist Singles Clubs?
__________________
Drop your shields and lower your weapons. It is useless to resist us. Your distinctiveness will be added to our own.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:04 PM
|
#8045
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
just wondering
Was ThrashersFan here before JustForFun stopped hanging around?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:07 PM
|
#8046
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
worse than wearing trousers
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/africa...ing/index.html
spree -- woman to be stoned to death for having a child more than 9 months after she divorced
n(cancel that tour of Nigeria!)cs
Edited to say I look just like my avatar in real life, only my hair isn't quite that red...
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:10 PM
|
#8047
|
I didn't do it.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
|
yesterday's article
The folks at amlaw were concerned that we have attacked their reporter's honesty, I told them that I would make it clear it was my opinion, and that I had been careful to use words like feel and believe. They disagreed, felt we didn't divide up the two well. I appreciate that, though I am not sure I agree. Still, I want to be fair, so: Everything I have said about the article and Ms. Smith has been my opinion.
Now, in an email exchange I learned some more information, which is the second purpose of this post.
In his email expressing his concern the person felt we could have disagreed with the article without attacking the integrity of Ms. Smith. I understand why he feels this way, but I disagree. I disagree because it is my opinion that it is the integrity of the story and the reporting that is lacking.
This person said he is the one who decided to focus on West (something I don't think particularly bothered any of us) and boil it down to the cursing (which is I believe the meat of the problem here.) You should also know he told me that he felt our reasons were childish and petty, which is why he chose to boil them down to cursing. Or at least that is how I interpreted what he said to me.
More's the pity that this is the basis for our relationship with this news organization. We could have had a useful and mutually beneficial relationship. What a shame.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:10 PM
|
#8048
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,277
|
Shock the monkey, or I'm shocked to find gambling going on at this casino.
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
(5) shot a man in Reno just to watch him die;
|
You know, one of the things that I hate the most about being a lawyer is that it takes the fun out of simple entertainment. If he shot the guy in Reno, what's he doing in a California state prison? Obviously he did something in California too, but what? Did he do time for the shooting too? Did he get caught for the shooting in Nevada? When he gets out of Folsom, will he then have to serve time for the shooting?
All I know is that it's going to be a long time before he's moving farther down the line.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:12 PM
|
#8049
|
In my dreams ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
|
What do you drink?
Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I don't see how the beer conversion can be right. A bottle of beer is 12 OZ., and a pint is 16 OZ.
|
FWIW, these were British & Canadian doctors. An imperial pint is 20 oz.
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:20 PM
|
#8050
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,277
|
yesterday's article
Quote:
Originally posted by leagleaze
The folks at amlaw were concerned that we have attacked their reporter's honesty, I told them that I would make it clear it was my opinion, and that I had been careful to use words like feel and believe. They disagreed, felt we didn't divide up the two well. I appreciate that, though I am not sure I agree. Still, I want to be fair, so: Everything I have said about the article and Ms. Smith has been my opinion.
Now, in an email exchange I learned some more information, which is the second purpose of this post.
In his email expressing his concern the person felt we could have disagreed with the article without attacking the integrity of Ms. Smith. I understand why he feels this way, but I disagree. I disagree because it is my opinion that it is the integrity of the story and the reporting that is lacking.
This person said he is the one who decided to focus on West (something I don't think particularly bothered any of us) and boil it down to the cursing (which is I believe the meat of the problem here.) You should also know he told me that he felt our reasons were childish and petty, which is why he chose to boil them down to cursing. Or at least that is how I interpreted what he said to me.
More's the pity that this is the basis for our relationship with this news organization. We could have had a useful and mutually beneficial relationship. What a shame.
|
Her name was on the byline, she's the only person that we have had any contact with, and we had no reason at all to assume that she did not write the story. Either she is a shitty reporter who didn't give both sides to the story, or the publication is a shitty publication that wastes their reporters' time by sending them after stories that they're not going to publish anyway. If he's boiling down the story and wants to deflect the ire from his reporter, he should have fucking put his name on the byline.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:22 PM
|
#8051
|
Puck You
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrounded by idiots and assholes.
Posts: 1,076
|
just wondering
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Was ThrashersFan here before JustForFun stopped hanging around?
|
I don't know, but I do know that I am not anyone's sock. I was also registered at the "old board" but never said much. I watched this new one for a little while and finally registered because it looked like fun to join in the fray. I have never been JustForFun or anyone else. ![Smilie](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
When you say Budweiser you've said it all.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:28 PM
|
#8052
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
|
Booze
Thrashers Fan: "this stuff is 7.5% alcohol -- they measure it to the legal 5.5% prior to icing and apparently the icing process increases the alcohol content -- at only 110 calories."
This is a chemical impossibility. One gram of ethyl alcohol yields 7 calories of energy when metabolized by the body. That converts to about 100 calories per drink equivalent (a 12 oz. 4% beer, 5 oz. glass of wine, or 1.25 oz. shot) solely from the alcohol and not considering the calories from other components of the beverage (residual sugars or grains in beers and wines, for example). Thus, one cannot physically create a 7.5% 12 oz. beer with only 110 calories. If Bud Ice Light is 110 calories, it cannot be more than about 4.5% alcohol. See e.g. http://www.theraven.com/beer.html (caloric and alcoholic contents of 200 beers).
For an excelent discussion of alcohol measurments, potency, calories, and how measurement by weight or volume can make a significant difference, see http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/publica.../alcdoses.html
While we are at it, lets also dispel some of the rumors about alcohol causing weight gain. Although it can affect metabolism and be burned instead of fat - http://www.thefactsaboutfitness.com/...ch/alcohol.htm - studies find that alcohol consumption actually tends to reduce weight - http://www2.potsdam.edu/alcohol-info...AndWeight.html
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:32 PM
|
#8053
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
yesterday's article
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Her name was on the byline, she's the only person that we have had any contact with, and we had no reason at all to assume that she did not write the story. Either she is a shitty reporter who didn't give both sides to the story, or the publication is a shitty publication that wastes their reporters' time by sending them after stories that they're not going to publish anyway. If he's boiling down the story and wants to deflect the ire from his reporter, he should have fucking put his name on the byline.
|
I can see why some people (particularly those who are older and less tech-savvy) might jump to the conclusion that because this is an internet chat board, the users must be younger, but I can attest that there are a fair number of partner types around these parts. Maybe if they had understood that we here are his target audience, and not school children, they might have been less patronizing.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:33 PM
|
#8054
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Booze
Quote:
Originally posted by LessinSF
studies find that alcohol consumption actually tends to reduce weight
|
Well, yeah, if waking up in a bathtub in Istanbul minus one kidney counts as weight loss.
|
|
|
06-03-2003, 03:37 PM
|
#8055
|
naughty but sweet
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dramatically lowering my post per day average
Posts: 266
|
Shock the monkey, or I'm shocked to find gambling going on at this casino.
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
You know, one of the things that I hate the most about being a lawyer is that it takes the fun out of simple entertainment. If he shot the guy in Reno, what's he doing in a California state prison?
|
sadly enough, i have wondered the exact same thing. i finally decided that he was in prison for something else but mentioned the shooting in reno because it was the worst crime that he ever did but for some unknown reason he got away with. i guess the real explaination is that there aren't many recognizable two syllable town or city names in california - i guess that barstow or needles could work, but reno does sound cooler.
of course, i also have checked to see if there was another reno in california before (if there is it wasn't on my map) so maybe i just take song lyrics too seriously.
ms. naughty diplomat
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|