Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03

Originally posted by leagleaze
Right, well, long name aside, I can certainly register another domain name that points to this one. If you seriously think it would be a help.


As it happens though, Alex's problem happened right when the site opened, and as I recall, it was in the middle of a general crackdown for his firm. I am unaware of anyone else running into this problem after repeated visits to the site.

They just havent fired me yet.

Originally posted by MisterEbola
Have noticed the volume of posts is off by about 30% today - then noticed that PP is not posting. Coincidence?

She must be out trying new burritos. Or getting the HBI from some paralegal/mailroom clerk in an attempt to burn additional calories after yesterday's revealing discussion about orgasms.

Thanks for pointing that out. Of course, since I am the one who brought youthe theology and calorie counting threads, it would be hard to notice my absence. But still, isnt it outable?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by leagleaze
Mine too. I wonder how much of it is mind over matter though, i.e. for some women who are lesbians the thought of being attracted to a man is upsetting to them, it challenges their notions of lesbianism so getting turned on by male/male or hetero porn is unacceptable so they repress it. Same with straight men for that matter and male/male porn.


I don't see what the big deal is frankly. Hot sex is hot sex.

I gotta disagree that gay male sex is arousing to hetero males. I've seen gay porn, and the only thing I recall thinking was "goddamnit that's gotta hurt like hell".

Gay male porn also leads to ask whether the pitcher/catcher arrangement in a gay male relationship is rigid or flexible. I mean, does one guy assert himself as pitcher and he's pitcher for the duration of the relationship, or do the pitcher and catcher swap roles from time to time?

S("Now Norton, I know that you been watchin' me, and I know that you know that I know you been watching me... Now Norton my friend, how would you like to...")D

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by bilmore
Which is counterintuitive, and sort of dumb, as any rise in male homosexuality takes hetero competition for babes out of the picture, while lesbianism takes out the babes.

(Why, it's like decrying high unemployment, and raising taxes to fix it.)

Gay male men are the greatest asset to straight men everywhere. Any straight man who is homophobic has shit for brains. Think about it:

1. Hot women have way more in common with most gay male men than straight men;
2. Gay men tend to be better dressers and more attractive (or at least more put together) than most of their straight male counterparts;
3. Gay men are generally better dancers; and
4. Gay men like shopping more than straight men.*

Now, in light of the above, if all gay men suddenly went straight, they'd steal all the attractive women. Straight guys should be damn glad so many men who have a load of the qualities hot women would dig in a mate voluntarily take themselves out of the competition.

S(The way I see it, straight men hating gay men doesn't make a sticth of sense - in fact, from an evolutionary perspective, its counterproductive)D

* Gross generalizations, yes, but grounded in true stereotypes.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Edited to remove double post.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Double post

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Wimbledon starts today. Live from 7am to 1pm on ESPN2. I dont have the two weeks off but do have some time off. Did we decide that spoiling is out, or did Slave's theory that rebroadcasted matches at night are watched solely by people who saw the scores on Yahoo and AOL? Do I need to put Less and comapny back on my ignore list for the fortnight so Wimby isnt spoiled?

And speaking of tennis, I finally figured out who Kirsten Dunst lookes like. I saw the cat's meow last night (she was horribly miscast as Marion Davies who was probalby eight years or so older than Dunst who actually got kinda valley girl at points). Kirsten Dunst looks like Monica Seles. I also saw Kirsten for about two seconds on a rerun on MTV Movie awards. While I know Halle and CHarlize are very pretty ladies (though I dont *feel* them per se), I honestly do not get what is attractive about Dunst. Beady eyes, thin lips, round face. I dont get it. Ther is another actress I dont get eithre but I cant think of who she is rightnow.

You're right, Dunst is noweher near Halle or Charlize, but neither are 99.9% of breathing women on planet Earth.

Dunst is just a good all American girl actress. She's realistic in "regular girl" parts where genetic freaks like Berry and Theron would be a little unbelievable.

S(plus, Dunst has great guns and doesn't seem to own a bra - you gotta like a girl who ain't afraid to grapple witb gravity mano a mano)D

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You're right, Dunst is noweher near Halle or Charlize, but neither are 99.9% of breathing women on planet Earth.

Dunst is just a good all American girl actress. She's realistic in "regular girl" parts where genetic freaks like Berry and Theron would be a little unbelievable.

S(plus, Dunst has great guns and doesn't seem to own a bra - you gotta like a girl who ain't afraid to grapple witb gravity mano a mano)D

In The Cats Meow, Dunst was supposed to be a "gorgeous blonde" which is a joke. It was hard to see why WIlliam Randolph Hearst would worship Monica SEles. Charlize would have made a lot more sense in the role, from an age as well as looks perspective. And her acting could not be worse.

[evenodds]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Wimbledon starts today. Live from 7am to 1pm on ESPN2. I dont have the two weeks off but do have some time off. Did we decide that spoiling is out, or did Slave's theory that rebroadcasted matches at night are watched solely by people who saw the scores on Yahoo and AOL? Do I need to put Less and comapny back on my ignore list for the fortnight so Wimby isnt spoiled?

We are NOT spoiling sports that air in Europe and are rebroadcast. If you wish to discuss the matches of Wimbledon or stages of the TDF, please add spoiler space.

[evenodds]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
In The Cats Meow, Dunst was supposed to be a "gorgeous blonde" which is a joke. It was hard to see why WIlliam Randolph Hearst would worship Monica SEles.

I didn't hate her casting in the Cat's Meow. In fact, I thought it was more believable than Melanie Griffith as the older version of the same role in RKO 281.

The best cast role in Cat's Meow was Eddie Izzard as Charlie Chaplin.

Originally posted by evenodds
I didn't hate her casting in the Cat's Meow. In fact, I thought it was more believable than Melanie Griffith as the older version of the same role in RKO 281.

The best cast role in Cat's Meow was Eddie Izzard as Charlie Chaplin.

I totally thought that was Phillip Seyjour Hoffman which isnt surprising givent that the first time I saw Eddie Izzard, I thought he was Phillip SEymour Hoffman in drag with a british accent. I would say he was miscast as he was not remotely attractive and seemed way too old for Kirsten Dunst. Youd idnt think Kirsten Dunst had total moments of, like, ohmigod!? And comparing her casting to Melanie Griffith's says nothing about Dunst being miscast. Griffith is the biggest joke around. A classic case of nepotism with bad plastic surgery and an annoying whispery child voice. Doesnt work on someone pushing fifty.

SPOILER










































The nubmer one seed and defending champ is in some big big trouble. After taking first set 6 -1, he dropped the next two sets and now is down a break, with ihs opponent, some qualifier you never heard of, serving for the match. Fuck it sucks to be at work. Anyone got this on in their office some how, some way? What are the commentators saying?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
I totally thought that was Phillip Seyjour Hoffman which isnt surprising givent that the first time I saw Eddie Izzard, I thought he was Phillip SEymour Hoffman in drag with a british accent. I would say he was miscast as he was not remotely attractive and seemed way too old for Kirsten Dunst. Youd idnt think Kirsten Dunst had total moments of, like, ohmigod!? And comparing her casting to Melanie Griffith's says nothing about Dunst being miscast. Griffith is the biggest joke around. A classic case of nepotism with bad plastic surgery and an annoying whispery child voice. Doesnt work on someone pushing fifty.

Griffin, however, is forever emblazoned in my memory for that spectacular moment in the otherwsie lamentable Bonfire of the Vanities where she sheds her fur coat and stands before the camera wearing only lingerie. I ain't much for lingerie, but the smokes and blow diet she was on at the time gave a her a body which would deflect bullets, yet at the same time retained some gorgeous curves.

S(but you're dead on about the acting - she couldn't act to save her life)D

[Anne Elk]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Wimbledon stuff

Go to www.wimbledon.org, BBC radio has great coverage that you can listen to over the internet. Click on the Audio/Video link.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
In The Cats Meow, Dunst was supposed to be a "gorgeous blonde" which is a joke. It was hard to see why WIlliam Randolph Hearst would worship Monica SEles. Charlize would have made a lot more sense in the role, from an age as well as looks perspective. And her acting could not be worse.

You clearly have never seen "Bring it On", which is by far the best cheerleading competition movie ever. Dunst stars as the cheer captain. Plus there's a locker room scene.

And have I mentioned the locker room scene?