Meh. - Page 76

notcasesensitive · 10-27-2005, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Hell, if he can get her to go along with it, he can tie Mrs. Wonk to the coffee table and spank her. What's good for the goose, iykwim.

She ties you to the coffee table and spanks you? Or do I not know the meaning of that good for the goose/good for the gander phrase? Or is this whifferific?

Multiple choice.

ltl/fb · 10-27-2005, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
She ties you to the coffee table and spanks you? Or do I not know the meaning of that good for the goose/good for the gander phrase? Or is this whifferific?

Multiple choice.

I thought it was sauce, not good.

Maybe it's good sauce.

Mmmmasala, for instance.

notcasesensitive · 10-27-2005, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I thought it was sauce, not good.

Maybe it's good sauce.

Mmmmasala, for instance.

sauce for the goose/sauce for the gander?

you people are confusing me today.

ltl/fb · 10-27-2005, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
sauce for the goose/sauce for the gander?

you people are confusing me today.

Yes. I think the saying is "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Or, what's sauce for the shrimp is sauce for the paneer, if you prefer.

10-27-2005, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
US Weekly had some ridiculous article that she's got her figure back with some super exercise regimen. Notwithstanding the fact that you're not supposed to be doing crunches or sit-ups, or much cardio, within 4 weeks of a C-section, I think the article did women everywhere a disservice by not mentioning the tummy tuck and lipo she had the day of the delivery.

I don't feel any need to add "allegedly" to this last sentence -- she definitely had a tummy tuck and lipo, this I know to a metaphysical certainty.

I thought it was unpossible to even move for four weeks after a tunmmy tuck and lipo. Like you are in some body bandage and lying in bed. Do we have any faketitters who can confirm?

My sister had a c section and she could barely walk for like the first two weeks.

Not Bob · 10-27-2005, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Isn't it more of a disgust with the fact that they smoked when she was pregnant?

Actually, more disgust with the fact that it seems like one or both of them are smoking in every picture I have seen of them together.

(Damn, I've outed myself as Mayor Bloomberg!)

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 10-27-2005, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
My sister had a c section and she could barely walk for like the first two weeks.

That wasn't from her c-section. I rode her hard and put her away wet.

In other words, I fucked your sister.

spookyfish · 10-27-2005, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
This is just pathetic, Hank. Surely the Detroit or Michigan Bars have some sort of lawyer's assistance program, don't they?

You might want to make clear to him that you're talking about Bar Associations. I think that may be part of his problem. . .

dtb · 10-27-2005, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
I thought it was unpossible to even move for four weeks after a tunmmy tuck and lipo. Like you are in some body bandage and lying in bed. Do we have any faketitters who can confirm?

My sister had a c section and she could barely walk for like the first two weeks.

The mother of a friend of my son's got lipo and was walking around the next day. She had it on her stomach for sure (to cure the results of post-c-section flabbiness) and perhaps on the thighs (not positive about that). I didn't realize it was an outpatient procedure, but if she is any indicator, I think it is.

Mr. Man · 10-27-2005, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Yes. I think the saying is "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Or, what's sauce for the shrimp is sauce for the paneer, if you prefer.

That is so not correct.

10-27-2005, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Speaking of which, back in the day, my college roommate and I referred to the mullet hairstyle (we were ignorant of the technical term at the time) as "the Florida hairdo".

Is that wrong?

We were also ignorant and called it the soccer hair do, and later, the John Kruk. I think I may have learned the term mullet from the FB. Where I also learned disco mitt.

Pretty Little Flower · 10-27-2005, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Ha! I'm a Pirate . . .

We know, Lilacbeard, we know. Is it possible to get one of those blousey white pirate shirts with a spread collar?

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 10-27-2005, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
We were also ignorant and called it the soccer hair do

The soccer hairdo is not a mullet. A mullet is short on top, but long in the back. A soccer hairdo is long on top and long in the back. I must stick up for my HS locks.

notcasesensitive · 10-27-2005, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr. Man
That is so not correct.

http://www.bartleby.com/59/3/whatsgoodfor.html

I don't get if it means that the sauce served on the goose would also be good on a gander or if there is some weird historical thing about geese enjoying sauce. If so, we sure turned that joy around on them, what with the cooking them and eating them in sauce.

"We" means humans generally in this context, as I don't think I've ever eated goose. Or gander.

Pretty Little Flower · 10-27-2005, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
The soccer hairdo is not a mullet. A mullet is short on top, but long in the back. A soccer hairdo is long on top and long in the back. I must stick up for my HS locks.

You should have mentioned fucking her sister, but maybe using a colorful equestrian metaphor.