» Site Navigation |
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
12-15-2003, 01:01 PM
|
#1201
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I agree with Sebby about agreeing with the chick in the article EXCEPT that you know if you have sexual chemistry with someone long before you have sex with them.
What you don't know until you have sex with someone is whether or not it'll be any good. Which sadly has little to do with sexual chemistry.
|
As to the former, are you mad??? I've known tons of chicks who've lamented "God, he was hot and everything seemed perfect, but [his dick was too small; he had bad technique; he had a horrible body; he smelled; he turned me off with his cheesy pillow talk; etc...]. I've gone home with girls who seemed like bedroom rock stars only to be really let down. You don't klnow the chemistry until you're both naked and going at it. Oh, and you must be naked in a well lit room the first time. Doesn't have to be flourescent light, but there must be enough light that you both check out each other in full. If you stay hot for one another after this first gig and there's an emotional spark, things will work from there...
As to the latter, I think you're mistaking flirting skills for sexual chemistry. No hint of sexual chemistry rears its head until your first kiss.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:04 PM
|
#1202
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
What's the name of the board?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
? I think the reason you cannot appreciate these posts is bc you are a newbie.
|
Newbie? My dearest Paigow, and I say this in the most sincerely concerned way and not to be a nitpicker, I believe the word is "newber".
Unless of course you have invented a new word, in which case, smashing!
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:04 PM
|
#1203
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
What's the name of the board?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
a couple of mallchicks.
|
Who apparently get $150 million EACH upon turning 18. It's pretty amazing that neither of these girls has had a drinking/drug/sex problem...
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:04 PM
|
#1204
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
What's the name of the board?
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave
I didn't watch the Survivor finale, fitting squarely in the category of people who don't care.
But good grief. I had the misfortune of watching about 20 minutes of the CBS Early Show this morning (lost the remote), and they must have mentioned the show and the winner at least 15 times, not including the commercials for Letterman etc. What a bunch of whores.
Dave
|
All the networks do that shit. I hate all the cross-selling during football games. Nothing is more pathetic than listening to Madden plug some worthless sitcom on ABC. Embarrassing.
Not that he isn't embarrassing himself on other ways during the telecasts, but at least those are part of his personality.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:05 PM
|
#1205
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave
That would be a great movie title.
|
there's only so many ways you can say 9 1/2 weeks.
I always make sure my sex odesseys last a little more than a 1/2 week longer than three months, just to make sure I'm not reminded of Mickey Rourke in any way.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:05 PM
|
#1206
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
not really responsive
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
Or a new set of tits.
|
Or that. But that seems an awful expense to get out of a minor bad mood, but if you've got the cash handy, go with it...
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:05 PM
|
#1207
|
prodigal poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I agree with Sebby about agreeing with the chick in the article EXCEPT that you know if you have sexual chemistry with someone long before you have sex with them.
What you don't know until you have sex with someone is whether or not it'll be any good. Which sadly has little to do with sexual chemistry.
|
I agree with BnB's exception to agreeing with Sebbby.
You know from the first time you touch a person if you have chemistry. Sexual intercourse is not required to determine if the chemistry is there.
Still, the pills must erode the social user's already fragile self-confidence. Is the fear that she won't like you if you don't fuck all night? Or that you won't have anything to talk about when it's over? Or is the conquest the only goal?
__________________
My enemies curse my name, but rave about my ass.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:07 PM
|
#1208
|
Genius Known As ABBAKiss
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 3,540
|
What's the name of the board?
Quote:
Pink looking horrible, Dharma looking hot
|
I used to think Pink was sort of cute but she looks HORRIBLE all the time lately. Ew. Also, she says she does not work out. So how does she have the D'Angelo hip muscles? (or are those abs?)
WRT Dharma, I've always found her quite odd looking, and not in a Mena Suvari "but I look stunning when the camera angle is right" way. She looks like Faith Hill in that picture.
The twins are pretty cute and not really all that young anymore. Didn't Paris already make her first video at their age? They are falling behind the curve.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:07 PM
|
#1209
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by evenodds
Is the fear that she won't like you if you don't fuck all night? Or that you won't have anything to talk about when it's over? Or is the conquest the only goal?
|
The two guys I know who've used it said that their SOs feared that the fucking would never end...
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:09 PM
|
#1210
|
She Said, Let's Go!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hollerin' for Heras
Posts: 1,781
|
What's the name of the board?
Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Who apparently get $150 million EACH upon turning 18. It's pretty amazing that neither of these girls has had a drinking/drug/sex problem...
|
Give them just a little more time. The second that pervert internet timer someone's keeping on them goes off and they're fair game, they'll have plenty of willing helpers for all of those.
__________________
but you'll look sweet/upon the seat/of a bicycle built for two
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:11 PM
|
#1211
|
Steaming Hot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Giving a three hour blowjob
Posts: 8,220
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by evenodds
I agree with BnB's exception to agreeing with Sebbby.
|
And shockingly, I agree with Sebbbby. You don't know until you actually have sex.
But I don't agree with this full lights on business. That kind of lighting does not flatter my workaholic pallor or skanky tattoos.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:12 PM
|
#1212
|
Guest
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
As to the latter, I think you're mistaking flirting skills for sexual chemistry. No hint of sexual chemistry rears its head until your first kiss.
|
I think its time to put the Graffix down. Do you not remember your recent post about checking out of a hotel, making eyecontact with some chick and wantging to fuck her right there?
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:13 PM
|
#1213
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
You might win some, but you just lost one
Lauryn Hill, pissed off:
'VATICAN CITY - During a Christmas benefit concert at the Vatican, Grammy-winning singer Lauryn Hill launched into an unscheduled tirade against priests who have abused children, according to Italian newspaper reports.
Hill read a statement criticizing the church and its leaders during the Saturday night concert, where she was a featured performer.
Several Italian newspapers yesterday ran translations of the statement, which was delivered in English. They quoted the hip-hop singer as saying there was "no acceptable explanation for defending the church."
"God has been a witness to the corruption of his leadership, of the exploitation and abuses ... by the clergy," she said.
This was an apparent reference to the scandal in the United States last year over the sexual abuse of children by priests.
"I realize some of you may be offended by what I'm saying, but what do you say to the families who were betrayed by the people in whom they believed?" La Repubblica newspaper quoted her as saying.'
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/goss...p-128860c.html
TM
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:13 PM
|
#1214
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,207
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by evenodds
I agree with BnB's exception to agreeing with Sebbby.
You know from the first time you touch a person if you have chemistry. Sexual intercourse is not required to determine if the chemistry is there.
Still, the pills must erode the social user's already fragile self-confidence. Is the fear that she won't like you if you don't fuck all night? Or that you won't have anything to talk about when it's over? Or is the conquest the only goal?
|
This is a vulgar response, but there's no toher way to answer...
You need intercourse to determine sexual chemistry. There's a certain feeling which is unique to each meaningful sexual experience, and it can't really be determined until you are inside the other person or the other person is inside you (I've no gay male sex experience, but I imagine this translates to gay men as well). Anyway, the experience is a combination of instinctual primordial feelings, hormones, emotions and to a great degree, physical feelings. Some people just don't "fit" well in all these sensate categories. That's why you need the intercourse thing. Its nature's ultimate compatibility test.
Of course, you can have throw away flings where there's no real sensual exchange other than an orgasm and that feels great. You can also have sex with someone for whom you care but realize in the midst of it, "Shit, as much as I like her, this just ain't working."
You gotta fit in many regards, and one of those regards is physical.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 01:13 PM
|
#1215
|
It's all about me.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enough about me. Let's talk about you. What do you think of me?
Posts: 6,004
|
Viagra & Sexual Acrobatics
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
As to the former, are you mad??? I've known tons of chicks who've lamented "God, he was hot and everything seemed perfect, but [his dick was too small; he had bad technique; he had a horrible body; he smelled; he turned me off with his cheesy pillow talk; etc...]. I've gone home with girls who seemed like bedroom rock stars only to be really let down. You don't klnow the chemistry until you're both naked and going at it. Oh, and you must be naked in a well lit room the first time. Doesn't have to be flourescent light, but there must be enough light that you both check out each other in full. If you stay hot for one another after this first gig and there's an emotional spark, things will work from there...
As to the latter, I think you're mistaking flirting skills for sexual chemistry. No hint of sexual chemistry rears its head until your first kiss.
|
Respectfully disagree. But maybe its definitional, our disagreement.
As to the former, sexual chemistry to me is that electrical current that is in the air between me and someone when I've met someone and really want to get them naked. It's that hypersensitivity of every nerve ending, so that every brush up against me gets me hot and all I can think about is, well honestly, at the beginnning, my mouth. For me, it's all centered around that kiss, and wanting to know it and taste it and feel it. To me, that's sexual chemistry...the wanting it really bad, so that you can almost feel it...you know what that kiss will feel like, what that hand will feel like, what those thrusts will feel like...and you are on the edge of your seat in anticipation.
Now, I've had sexual chemistry with people that's gone bust after they've kissed me or we've gone home and gotten naked together, for all of ther rreasons you've expounded above. Sexual technique musst follw up the initial chemisrty, or else the chemistry simply evaporates.
Now when the sexual chemistry gets mixed up with stellar sexual technique, and along the way you find that you have a kink or two in common, well that's sexual alchemy and that's pretty wonderful.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e6/307e6b67e92a2edef24e059f6db810e5fcac9a66" alt="Closed Thread" |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|