It was the wrong thread

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
I'm trying to remember way back in Family Law, but I thought that in Texas, the wife gets half no matter if she's in the will or not?

What a shit law school you were in. Even if that correctly states Texas law, you have to know the steps to avoid application of that rule, through some combination of trusts, asset transfers and such. There's always a way around the rule.

[Oliver_Wendell_Ramone]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What a shit law school you were in. Even if that correctly states Texas law, you have to know the steps to avoid application of that rule, through some combination of trusts, asset transfers and such. There's always a way around the rule.

Hey now, no need to criticize the law school. She may have just been to busy sucking dick to pay any attention in class.

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
I'm trying to remember way back in Family Law, but I thought that in Texas, the wife gets half no matter if she's in the will or not?

I don't know community property law very well either, but I seem to recall that the community property only apples to assts that arise form the marriage - so it wouldn't touch what he had going into the marriage, which I'd guess was roughly everything.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Hey now, no need to criticize the law school. She may have just been to busy sucking dick to pay any attention in class.

Fair point. And I'm hesitant to mark down the law school for tolerating dick sucking in class.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by baltassoc
I don't know community property law very well either, but I seem to recall that the community property only apples to assts that arise form the marriage - so it wouldn't touch what he had going into the marriage, which I'd guess was roughly everything.

Hank?

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Hank?

Am I wrong?

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by baltassoc
Am I wrong?

Particularly right. Her basic claim was that he had promised to give her a substantial chunk of his main trust, which he did not do. Claims based on his will wouldn't get her much.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Particularly right. Her basic claim was that he had promised to give her a substantial chunk of his main trust, which he did not do.

Because he died too soon.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Is Anna Nicole Smith somehow a better name than Vicky Lynn Marshall?

Seriously.

This is like a guy changing his name from Todd Jones to Bill Smith.

Maybe Todd Jones did stuff he wanted to keep quiet?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What a shit law school you were in. Even if that correctly states Texas law, you have to know the steps to avoid application of that rule, through some combination of trusts, asset transfers and such. There's always a way around the rule.

Plus, you'd think that rule would have come up in the 20000 some pages of pleadings- or else she'd have a pretty solid malpractice claim.

[SlaveNoMore]

NotFromHere
Doesn't Vicky Lynn sound the tiniest bit more trailer park?

Vicky Lynn sounds much more stripper/Playmate - which, uh, she was.

Originally posted by Spanky
Since I got no worth while advice. No updates.

I am halfway through until I found you. Wont be long till I am finished. Everyone else finished?

For a minute there, I thought you were singing a country song to me. I am gong ona long long trip next week and will finish it then

I gave you excellent advice. As did someone else. Spill.

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What a shit law school you were in. Even if that correctly states Texas law, you have to know the steps to avoid application of that rule, through some combination of trusts, asset transfers and such. There's always a way around the rule.

"Ping! Pow!

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Particularly right. Her basic claim was that he had promised to give her a substantial chunk of his main trust, which he did not do. Claims based on his will wouldn't get her much.

First off, the yahoo story says she began her battle before he even died. Was he any more incapacaitated when she began her battle than the eight months before when they got married? If so, shouldnt that nullify her claim in the first place? And if not, shouldnt that be proof, on its face, that he did not intend for her to have the money if she was fighting when he was still able to step in? Why woldnt she get it in wrirint if he was still alive? Doesnt add up.

Is the douchbag son arguing Undue Influence or whatever that argument is when someone cant think straight bc they have tits the size of a skull smothering their face and they cant escape bc they are bound to either a bed or a wheelchair?

From a state probate level, how does she have a case? And how did this get kicked to a ninth circuit bankruptcy court? Totally different case? She claimed bankruptcy and somehow brought this old rich guy thing in to that case? What happened here exactly?

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Vicky Lynn sounds much more stripper/Playmate - which, uh, she was.

The difference is clear. Anna Nicole poses in Playboy and Vicky Lynn poses in Hustler.