All Hank, all the time.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
It is a well-established fact that she takes it in the ass.

Which preserves her virginity, of course.

Dude, Anne CAN'T take it in the ass. Her pelvis would crack.

And without being coarse, which of course means I'll now be coarse, there ain't enough lube in the Bunny Ranch to make that stick of beef jerky even remotely pliable. Her ass hasn't opened for delivery or deposit in the last decade. Unless you're hung like a knitting needle, I'd say move along and find yourself a nice Asian Ladyboy.

[Wank McBumsky]

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
"Dragonbar" sounds like the kind of place one might find Asian ladyboys. I'm told they can be quite the lookers. Just sayin.

:blush: :flag:

[Wank McBumsky]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield

Unless you're hung like a knitting needle,.....

I read drinkng soy milke leans you out, true?

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

So now that the Supremes have ruled it's okay for cops to burst in on someone without announcing, so long as they can get a judge to rubberstamp their warrant, will it still be a problem if you defend yourself and your family ?

Spose you've done nothing wrong your whole life. Paid your taxes, drive the speed limit, drink responsibly. You have a couple of guns in the house cuz it's your right. One night Chief Wiggums and his jack booted minions, mistakenly believing your beautiful suburban abode at 123 Lilac Lane to actually be 132 Lilac Lane, a notorious house of illicit flag burners run by some gay marriage activists, burst into your house without knocking or announcing. Believing your home to be invaded, you blast a couple of caps in Wiggums, who succumbs. Are you facing the needle for killing a cop?

Discuss.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
So now that the Supremes have ruled it's okay for cops to burst in on someone without announcing, so long as they can get a judge to rubberstamp their warrant, will it still be a problem if you defend yourself and your family ?

Spose you've done nothing wrong your whole life. Paid your taxes, drive the speed limit, drink responsibly. You have a couple of guns in the house cuz it's your right. One night Chief Wiggums and his jack booted minions, mistakenly believing your beautiful suburban abode at 123 Lilac Lane to actually be 132 Lilac Lane, a notorious house of illicit flag burners run by some gay marriage activists, burst into your house without knocking or announcing. Believing your home to be invaded, you blast a couple of caps in Wiggums, who succumbs. Are you facing the needle for killing a cop?

Discuss.

No.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda

Charles Rangel is an embarrassment to any race. He's got as much business calling anybody stupid as I have accusing people of failing to stay on point in posts.

I loved his passionate defense of Milberg Weiss. Nice to see he's smart enough to follow orders from his finance people.

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No.

What a relief. Thanks.

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No.

I read this and was all set to go stock up on assault rifles until I remembered that you're one of the guys who thinks the government will be coming to tax his estate while his body is still warm.

Did Spanky mention that The Economist, that liberal rag, thinks it's a mistake to repeal the tax? I only got around to reading the article yesterday, but I know Spanks has a subscription.

[SlaveNoMore]

Sexual Harassment Panda
So now that the Supremes have ruled it's okay for cops to burst in on someone without announcing, so long as they can get a judge to rubberstamp their warrant, will it still be a problem if you defend yourself and your family ?

Spose you've done nothing wrong your whole life. Paid your taxes, drive the speed limit, drink responsibly. You have a couple of guns in the house cuz it's your right. One night Chief Wiggums and his jack booted minions, mistakenly believing your beautiful suburban abode at 123 Lilac Lane to actually be 132 Lilac Lane, a notorious house of illicit flag burners run by some gay marriage activists, burst into your house without knocking or announcing. Believing your home to be invaded, you blast a couple of caps in Wiggums, who succumbs. Are you facing the needle for killing a cop?

Discuss.

Bad facts for a test case.

They sought a warrant, and got it.
The warrant authorizing them to search for guns and drugs.
They got there - banged and burst - didn't wait for the guy to run out the back door.
Whoa Nelly!!!! - they found guns and drugs.
Now perp wants evidence suprressed.

Um, boo fucking hoo?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ironweed
I read this and was all set to go stock up on assault rifles until I remembered that you're one of the guys who thinks the government will be coming to tax his estate while his body is still warm.

Did Spanky mention that The Economist, that liberal rag, thinks it's a mistake to repeal the tax? I only got around to reading the article yesterday, but I know Spanks has a subscription.

Oh, no you don't. This is about the gun thing. No more of that silly liberal tax talk anymore.

I don't believe the govt will be taxing me. I plan to flame out into a magnificent failure, chasing Hank into the liver infirmary.

I don't read the Economist anymore because it bores me. It's too dense. I've been reading a steady diet of NR, Atlantic, VF, NYT and the Journal, which keeps me in a pertually confused and torn state. One one hand, I think the Journal is the only sensible voice in America on issues economic; on the other, Chric Hutchens' piece on blow jobs was a let down. But then, what drunkard could ever write properly about sex?

I used to enjoy the sex drunk, bouncing on the old lady like a goddamned trampoline. But as I've aged, the thrill of athletic has given way to pleasant recognition that I'm lucky she's got an ass that tight... I guess I'm saying I'm past my days of I-IV and phased into the soft Physical Graffiti portion of the ride.

Maybe not. Who can tell? But I know this - there'll be no money for anyone to take when I die. How that result's achieved will either be a pissload of fun or a harrowing downward slide into the abyss of gin. Either way works for me... just so long as I stay amused. Which is all that counts.

I am so past money.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Bad facts for a test case.

They sought a warrant, and got it.
The warrant authorizing them to search for guns and drugs.
They got there - banged and burst - didn't wait for the guy to run out the back door.
Whoa Nelly!!!! - they found guns and drugs.
Now perp wants evidence suprressed.

Um, boo fucking hoo?

Hey, you like drugs. I like drugs. We all like drugs. This may be a bad test case, but whatever it is, that shitbag Alito bent over for the right wingers. Fuck him, and fuck that fat windbag Scalia, with his obnoxious statement that "people hurt by this can sue for civil rights violations." No. No they can't. because unless the police violate your rights DELIBERATELY, you can't win one of those cases.

This ain't "conservative" jurisprudence. This is fucking activist shit. And this is why the GOP is about to get its fucking balls cut off in four months.

Fuck the "comservative" hypocrites. A conservative believes in people's rights to be free of state interference, not the converse. Fuck you, Alito. Really, fuck you.

[Adder]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
So now that the Supremes have ruled it's okay for cops to burst in on someone without announcing, so long as they can get a judge to rubberstamp their warrant, will it still be a problem if you defend yourself and your family ?

Spose you've done nothing wrong your whole life. Paid your taxes, drive the speed limit, drink responsibly. You have a couple of guns in the house cuz it's your right. One night Chief Wiggums and his jack booted minions, mistakenly believing your beautiful suburban abode at 123 Lilac Lane to actually be 132 Lilac Lane, a notorious house of illicit flag burners run by some gay marriage activists, burst into your house without knocking or announcing. Believing your home to be invaded, you blast a couple of caps in Wiggums, who succumbs. Are you facing the needle for killing a cop?

Discuss.

Who cares? You will die in the hail of bullets from the jack booted minions.

[Adder]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Charles Rangel is an embarrassment to any race. He's got as much business calling anybody stupid as I have accusing people of failing to stay on point in posts.

I loved his passionate defense of Milberg Weiss. Nice to see he's smart enough to follow orders from his finance people.

You have truly lost touch with relatity if you don't think that is funny.

Not that anyone would be surprised...

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Adder
You have truly lost touch with relatity if you don't think that is funny.

Not that anyone would be surprised...

I think its very funny. I actually think Rangel is very witty. But he's a still a race-baiting regressive whore.

Thanks for destroyiong my attempt at vitriol for vitriol's sake.